First Super Bowl Spot Of Winter

Christmas in November? Hah! Try Super Bowl ads in November.

From MediaPost:

Jaguar Plays Villain In First Super Bowl Spot

The cat is the villain in Jaguar’s first-ever Super Bowl ad. The automaker, which has hitherto had a limited TV spend, is jaguar-b_1making the campaign a harbinger of bigger things to come as the Land Rover sibling moves to grab more territory in the U.S. automotive market veldt. The ad with a “British Villains” theme that spotlights the forthcoming F-Type Coupe, will air during the second half of the game, per Jeff Curry, brand VP at the Mahwah, N.J.-based Jaguar U.S.A.

The hardclicking staff worked hard to find Jaguar’s “Disrupter” video, which you can watch here via Automotive News.

That’s a pretty low bar for disrupting, yeah? Not to get technical about it.

Regardless, more details via Forbes:

The Super Bowl spot will be directed by renowned British director Tom Hooper in London. The campaign asks the question, Jaguar said, “Have you ever noticed how in Hollywood movies, all the villains are played by Brits?” It will launch with a unique hashtag, #GoodToBeBad, and, like more and more Super Bowl campaigns, will rely heavily on teasing with digital elements and traditional marketing media as well.

In other words, Super Bowl business as usual.

Just a bit early.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Bull(bleep) In Journalism’s China Shop

It’s lately become clear that reporting on China triggers the law of diminishing returns.

From Saturday’s New York Times front page:

Bloomberg News Is Said to Curb Articles That Might Anger China

BEIJING — The decision came in an early evening call to four journalists huddled in a Hong Kong conference room. On the line 12 time zones away in New York was their boss, Matthew Winkler, the longtime editor in chief of Bloomberg News. And they were frustrated by what he was telling them.

The investigative report they had been working on for the better part of a year, which detailed the hidden financial ties between one of the wealthiest men in China and the families of top Chinese leaders, would not be published.

In the call late last month, Mr. Winkler defended his decision, comparing it to the self-censorship by foreign news bureaus trying to preserve their ability to report inside Nazi-era Germany, according to Bloomberg employees familiar with the discussion.

“He said, ‘If we run the story, we’ll be kicked out of China,’ ” one of the employees said. Less than a week later, a second article, about the children of senior Chinese officials employed by foreign banks, was also declared dead, employees said.

Bloomberg’s not the only news organization being muscled. The Times has also “come under similar pressure,” according to yesterday’s report.

The websites of The New York Times, including a new Chinese-language edition, were blocked when it published an article in October 2012 on the family wealth of Wen Jiabao, then the prime minister. Like Bloomberg, The Times has also not received residency visas for new journalists.

Coincidentally, last week’s edition of The Weekly Standard addressed the Chinese Wall in Mark Hemingway’s cover story on “the kid-gloves treatment of China by the American punditry.”

WStandard.v19-09.Nov11.Cover_

Inside, news organizations from Yahoo to the Washington Post get whacked, but the Times opinion pages – especially Thomas Friedman –  get especially blowtorched:

Thomas Friedman, the Times’s noted purveyor of mixed metaphors and Third World taxi-driver anecdotes, is generally acknowledged as the head cheerleader for the People’s Republic in the Western media . . .

In a column suggesting that the Chinese government views the American people as gullible and stupid, Friedman mocked U.S. citizens for complaining about the invasive fondling of the Transportation Security Administration. Never mind that China dragoons people into labor camps for making sarcastic jokes about the government on the Chinese version of Twitter. Friedman has claimed that China has better phone service than the United States (vast expanses of the country don’t have electricity or running water). And as sure as the sun rises through the smog in the Far East, Friedman has praised China’s clean energy efforts time and again. Meanwhile, only about 1 percent of China’s 560 million city dwellers breathe air that would be deemed safe according to EU pollution standards.

The Times news coverage, on the other hand, gets generally good reviews.

Indeed, once you venture away from the opinion pages, the Times’s reporting on China is pretty good.

Which brings us full-circle to yesterday’s Page One piece.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Dead Blogging Alan Dershowitz At Ford Hall Forum

Harvey Silverglate interviewing Alan Dershowitz is ten pounds of lawyer in a five-pound bag. But that’s exactly what Ford Hall Forum presented Thursday night in its program Taking the Stand, which just happens also to be the title of Dershowitz’s new book.

Both men were in fine fettle for the evening’s festivities. In his introduction, Silverglate Silverglate-Harvey-STAND-11-07-13-e1381845001159noted that Dershowitz is currently in his 50th year at Harvard Law School, has written 1000 articles  and 30 books, and has earned a reputation as “America’s lawyer of last resort.” Silverglate started the interview by expressing some amazement at the back cover of Taking the Stand, on which “half the comments are about what a scalawag you are, and worse.”

Whose idea was that, he asked.

“Oh, it was my idea for the negative blurbs,” Dershowitz said offhandedly. One of them saysAlan-Dershowitz-e1375295427189 simply: I don’t read Dershowitz. – Jimmy Carter. But, as it happens, both Bill Clinton and Barack Obama are happy to reveal that they do. The blurbs are full of that kind of back-and-forth. “I love my enemies list,” Dershowitz said. “They’ve called me a war criminal, deranged, an enemy of Israel, not bright – my enemies list is one of my proudest possessions. I’ve earned them.”

As they talked about his book, Dersowitz asserted that he would never reveal details about his clients unless they wanted him to, and Claus von Bulow did. Von Bulow, it turns out, never intended to serve his sentence if his appeal failed. He would kill himself, he told Dershowitz. “So I approached his appeal as a death penalty case,” Dershowitz said. “Because it was.”

He also told of having a cup of tea with Leona Helmsley (he didn’t check with her “because she’s dead and this happened in a public place”) when his was served with a little bit of water in the saucer (“I didn’t even notice”). Helmsley took the up and saucer, threw them to the ground smashing them into umpteen pieces, then screamed at the waiter to “get on your hands and knees and beg me for your job.” Dershowitz: “I told her ‘I’m your lawyer, but I will never be seen with you in public again.'”

One of his nicest clients? Mike Tyson. Honest to God.

Silverglate asked him when did you realize you’d become a public figure and when did you become comfortable with it? Of course, Dershowitz said he’s never felt comfortable being a public figure. You could see that one coming a mile away.

Ditto for his riff on the legal talking heads that overrun TV. “Most people on TV know nothing about the law,” Dershowitz said. “Have a big case and really lose bad.” C’mon down Marcia Clark, Mark Geragos, and Mickey Sherman. The Trayvon Martin commentary was particularly bad. “They did not know what self-defense is.”

Other highlights:

• “All of Eliot Spitzer’s problems were my fault. He was my researcher and he worked too hard and I said, ‘Eliot, Eliot – have some fun.'”

• Dershowitz was a terrible student early on. “My rabbi said, ‘Dershowitz, you have a big mouth and no brain. You can do one of two things with that: Become a conservative rabbi, or a lawyer.” We know how that turned out.

• As a law clerk in 1963, Dershowitz was the one who told the Supreme Court Justices that JFK had been shot. He was also invited to join the Warren Commission but declined because LBJ told the commission “I need the American public to know that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone.” Dershowitz said he didn’t want to be part of something where the outcome was predetermined (“even though I believe they got it right”). “So they withheld information to avoid doubts, and it wound up they created more.” (This was part of the Alan Dershowitz, Legal Zelig portion of the program.)

• “I’ve never met a group of people less courageous than tenured professors.”

• Contrary to popular opinion, Larry Summers has actually “done great things for women – every time he’s had to give up a job a woman has succeeded him. [See Drew Gilpin Faust and Janet Yellen.] If I ever want to get my daughter a great job, I just have to make sure Larry Summers has it first.”

• Dershowitz’s book includes a Letter to the Editor correcting his obituary.

During the Q&A, there was a heavy-footed pas de deux with an audience member over the  Israeli/Palestinian morass, which Dershowitz compensated for with a blistering monologue on Billy Bulger’s “reign of terror” (“William Bulger was the Godfather who ran the Mob in Massachusetts all those years; Whitey Bulger was the hit man”).

All in all, a most entertaining event. It should be posted on the Ford Hall Forum website sometime soon. Check it out.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Bloomberg Businessweek Has The Best Front Covers

Last week:

Unknown

 

This week:

image0011

 

Say no more.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

U.S. Government Ineptitude? Hah! I Stole A Pen From The SSA 40 Years Ago And It Still Writes

Rants about federal government ineptitude – read Obamacare – are all the rage these days.

But wait . . .

Back in the ’70s, the hard scrabbling staff worked at the Social Security Administration (civil service tests being the last resort of the liberal arts major) for a mercifully brief 18 months (see The Redemption Unit for details). And during that time, we stole a whole lot 136976of ballpoint pens.

Some of which still work.

So don’t tell us the federal government doesn’t do anything write – sorry, right.

You can steal damn good pens from it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

New York Mayor Bill de Blasiad

No sooner was Bill de Blasio elected mayor of New York than he was adlected in the New York Times.

Blackberry (the Joe Lhota of smartphones) ran this spread in Wednesday’s edition.

Screen Shot 2013-11-07 at 12.45.18 AM

 

That’s the very definition of whistling past the graveyard.

Meanwhile, Johnnie Walker went all bipartisan in this full-page, hedge-your-bets ad.

Screen Shot 2013-11-07 at 12.44.12 AM

 

Lots of potential in de Blasio’s future, yeah? More likely he’ll be running than walking, though.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

NYT A Two-Time Loser In Globe Sale

Apparently it wasn’t bad enough that the New York Times Co. got seven cents on the dollar for its 20-year ownership of the Boston Globe (and the Worcester Telegram & Gazette – we’re no John Henry!).

Now comes news from Fortune (via Mediabistro’s Morning Media Newsfeed) that the Times Co. took an even worse beating.

How being a tax dummy cost The New York Times $60M

A mistake made 20 years ago cost the Times big during the sale of the Boston Globe.

130808104922-new-york-times-building-620xa

FORTUNE — The New York Times Co.’s (NYT) purchase of the Boston Globe for more than $1 billion 20 years ago has turned out to be among the worst single newspaper acquisitions in history. But guess what? It’s even worse than it looks.

How is that possible? Because the Times not only made a disastrous, overpriced purchase, but also used a tax structure that assumed that it would own the Globe forever. As a result, the Times Co., which unloaded the Globe for a pittance last month, is missing out on a tax break that would have been worth almost as much as the “approximately $70 million” that Boston Red Sox owner John Henry paid for the Globe and its other financially disastrous Massachusetts purchase, the Worcester Telegram & Gazette.

What follows is a Talmudic reading of the tax code as it relates to the sale of the Globe, for which the Times Co. paid Globe parent Affiliated Publications $1.028 billion – $160 million in cash and $868 million in Times stock. But apparently the Timesniks structured the deal the wrong way.

Had Times done the deal by using a corporate structure that goes by the marvelous name of “horizontal double dummy,” it would have been able to add the $160 million cash portion of the price its “tax basis” in the Globe: the value it placed on the Globe for tax purposes. However, for reasons that aren’t clear — the company declined comment — it used a different technique. As a result, its tax basis in the Globe was the same as Affiliated Publications’ basis rather than being $160 million greater.

Got that?

Either way, Fortune’s senior editor-at-large Allan Sloan comes to this entirely predictable conclusion: “When acquirers buy a shiny new toy, they usually fail to structure the deal with a possible future sale in mind. Which, I suppose, makes them … double dummies.”

Bada boom.

UPDATE: Times spokeswoman Abbe Serphos told Politico’s Dylan Byers: “That tax structure was determined 20 years ago and the rest is conjecture.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Whose Side Is ‘Time’ On?

In his latest New York Times column, Joe Nocera marks yet another another chip in the traditional Chinese Wall between editorial and advertising (which in truth is more and more resembling the Berlin Wall circa 1990).

The Fall of the Wall?

On Wednesday night, I bumped into Norman Pearlstine at a charity dinner. He smiled his inscrutable smile and made the smallest of small talk. He looked off into space and seemed otherwise occupied.

Which, it turns out, he was. The next morning came the announcement that Pearlstine was leaving the Bloomberg media empire to return to his old haunt, Time Inc., where he had been editor in chief from 1995 to 2005. This time around at Time Inc., his title is chief content officer.

That’s a lot different from Pearlstine’s former position as editor in chief . . .

Read the rest at Sneak Adtack.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Lou Reed And The Boston Tea Party

Sunday’s New York Times features a nice trip down Memory Lane about Lou Reed’s days in Boston. The author: Tony Lioce, in 1967 a “third-generation Italian-American kid from Providence, R.I.”, now a “bartender in San Francisco.”

When Backstage Was No Big Deal

BERKELEY, Calif. — THE Lou I knew liked speed and cheap Scotch. Had short hair and wore weird shoes. Just as he could write something as harrowing as “Rock Minuet” or as tender as “Perfect Day,” he could also be frightening, the surliest of 03LOU-popupmisanthropes, or the most gentle person imaginable.

The songs he wrote for the Velvet Underground, back when I knew him, did as much as anything else in the ’60s to change my whole system of values. Even more than Bob Dylan’s, because they dealt with more complex issues and real taboos, Lou Reed’s songs taught me about many things, from why one always should try to be compassionate to the idea that a writer should shy away from nothing.

But that’s not what he wants to talk about in his Times piece, Lioce says. Rather “[t]his is about the days when rock ’n’ roll was still a people’s art, and the walls between an artist and his audience hadn’t yet been built.”

To wit:

I met Lou — who died a week ago today, at 71 — because it was so easy to. In 1967, after a falling out with their mentor Andy Warhol, the Velvets moved their music to Boston, where they would play a hall on Berkeley Street called the Boston Tea Party. They’d do a few nights a week every couple months or so. You’d pay three bucks and hear them play two long sets. And almost no one came. There’d be maybe 40 people on a good night. And generally the same 40 people night after night, including one girl who always showed up in a wedding dress.

And they all had access to the band, to one extent or another. Tony Lioce’s extent is well worth reading.

P.S. Be sure to check out the Boston Tea Party link. It’s totally the Hubback Machine.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Our ‘Beat The Press Party’ Bakeoff (John Henry Epistolary Edition)

The Great Boston MediaWatch Dogfight features a fresh face this week.

Start, as usual, with the Boston Herald’s Underdog Press Party.

The Wayne’s World webcast has a new host, as Friday’s edition of the Herald trumpeted (and the hardreading staff at Two-Daily Town also noted earlier).

Screen Shot 2013-11-02 at 1.26.36 AM

The media review also has one fewer panelist.

screen-shot-2013-11-01-at-1-38-06-pm

But the webcast is no less itself (and finally on YouTube).

Its topics this week:

The panel compared the press coverage of President Obama’s visit to Faneuil Hall to Mitt Romney’s event in 2006, when he signed the healthcare act in Massachusetts.

Of course, Obama’s visit wasn’t the biggest thing happening in Boston. The Red Sox became World Series Champions and we talk about who broadcast them and why ESPN might have a new rival.

The owner of the Red Sox became the official owner of the Boston Globe. John Henry wrote a 2,800 word Op-Ed in the Globe, but it was what he didn’t say that stood out.

Crosstown at WGBH’s Big Dog Beat the Press, the topics were Debating the Influence of Media Endorsements, Suzanne Somers’ Nutty Obamacare Rant, and – intersection! – Boston Globe Owner John Henry’s Letter to Readers.

So let’s go there.

Press Party take:

 

BTP take:

 

So, to recap:

John Henry’s op-ed was (BTP) “rather daunting” or (PP) “a virtual novel.” And he (BTP) “didn’t intentionally not address the potential conflict of interest [with his Red Sox ownership]” or (PP) “[failed to] promise readers the Globe won’t become the house PR organ of the Red Sox.”

Discuss among yourselves.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments