Presidential Candidates: Want Free Ads? It’s a Snap(chat)!

The news media love to label things, and presidential elections are no exception.

So 2000 was the Hanging Chad Election, 2004 was the Internet Election, 2008 was the Facebook Election, and 2012 was the Twitter Election (with this dissent).

But the jury’s still out on whether the 2016 campaign will be the Snapchat Election.

Pro (via re/code):

The Snapchat Elections Begin With Bernie, Hillary and Jeb

20150717-bernie-sanders-snapchat-crop

In 2008, it was the Google election. 2012 was Twitter’s turn as the campaign centerpiece. Facebook populism rang in the 2014 midterms.

And now, as 2016 approaches, prepare for the presidential politics of Snapchat.

Enter Bernie Sanders, the lefty, 73-year-old Democratic contender chasing Hillary Clinton in the polls. On Friday, the honorable Independent senator from Vermont made his debut on the mobile app (though judging from his expression, he doesn’t look entirely comfortable with the medium yet).

Con (via Wired):

Sorry Snapchat, But You’re Not Winning This Election

STORY-candidates-02-582x436-1

EVERY ELECTION SEASON has its shiny new toy, and this year, Snapchat is most definitely it. We’ve already seen Rand Paul take a chainsaw to the tax code on Snapchat. Jeb Bush announced his campaign on the platform. And, most recently, Hillary Clinton cheekily gushed to Iowans about how much she loves Snapchat because “those messages disappear all by themselves.”

On the surface, having a presence on Snapchat makes these candidates appear forward-thinking and committed to connecting with millennials, Snapchat’s core demographic. And yet, even as candidates and their young teams play with the platform, behind the scenes, many of the digital teams on presidential campaigns say it’s far too early to dub 2016 the Snapchat election, as many in the media have already breathlessly claimed. Compared to other advertising platforms like Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, and most importantly, TV, they say, the ephemeral messaging app has a long way to go toward proving its worth.

The problem: “The fact is, Snapchat’s entire business model is built around keeping user data private, a fact one Republican digital strategist called ‘antithetical to advertising.'”

Especially political advertising, which is obsessed with data mining.

Regardless . . .

Here’s a sampling of the Snapchat ads so far in the 2016 presidential campaign.

Rand Paul’s shady arrival at the first GOP debate:

 

 

Paul’s America’s Liberty PAC flat tax ad:

 

 

John Kasich’s New Day for America PAC:

 

 

Hillary Clinton’s cringeworthy Just Chillin’ ad:

 

 

A couple of Scott Walker down (at) home ads:

 

 

 

Donald Trump, always the contrarian, seems to prefer Instagram to Snapchat.

 

 

 

More Trumpet blasts here.

Another fun fact to know and tell: Hillary Clinton has a Pinterest page.

Finally, here’s a helpful Newsweek chart of who’s where:

 

0810candidatessocial01

 

More, most assuredly, to come.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The New ‘New Republic’ Has No Advertising

In the wake of the revolution/evolution at The New Republic last year, the hardworking staff has noted the Potemkin quality of the magazine, which is to say no advertising.

But in its current issue, the new New Republic has hit rock bottom.

It features exactly zero ads within its pages.

(To be fair graf goes here.)

To be fair, there is this sort-of ad on the inside front cover.

Screen Shot 2015-08-22 at 12.40.57 AM

And this actual ad (bleached-out screenshot – awkward!) on the back cover.

Screen Shot 2015-08-22 at 12.41.25 AM

But nothing in between.

Then again, given this table of contents, would you pony up for an ad?

Screen Shot 2015-08-22 at 12.41.53 AM

We’re placing the New Republic on the endangered species list as of . . . yesterday.

Boy publisher Chris Hughes: You’ve been warned.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Claire McCaskill’s Fabulous Scott Brownout

New York magazine’s Marin Cogan has a corker of a piece in The Cut today (tip o’ the pixel to Politico’s Morning Score).

Drinking Beer and Watching Baseball With Senator Claire McCaskill — the Most Candid Woman in the U.S. Senate

20-claire-mccaskill.w529.h352.2x

“WHAT??? WHAAAAT???”

Senator Claire McCaskill is shouting to no one in particular, though she is not alone: It’s the middle of July in St. Louis’s Busch Stadium, where the Cardinals are taking on the New York Mets. It’s hotter outside than the inside of a dog’s mouth. This has not deterred Missouri senator McCaskill, her husband, and her sister from coming out to support their beloved hometown team. The first batter up for the Mets has just sent a ball sailing out of the stadium — a home run. “That is not good,” McCaskill’s sister Anne, a silver-haired woman wearing electric-blue frames, interjects from our seats just behind home plate. The next batter lofts another ball high into the air. “Oh JESUS!” McCaskill shouts, then relaxes when a Cardinals outfielder catches the deep fly. Spying a waitress waiting to take orders at the end of the row, she leans over and calls for a Bud Select.

It’s a swell read – McCaskill seems to have no halfway house between her brain and her mouth – and never more so than here:

I’m about to ask her what she thinks of Scott Walker, but McCaskill has a question of her own. “What’s Scott Brown up to these days?” I tell her that the last I heard he was appearing as a guest on a celebrity cruise and pushing diet pills.

“No! Who goes on a celebrity cruise ship to see Scott Brown?” she scoffs. “Do people even know who he is? Wow. He will do anything to show his body.”

Not sure how we missed Brown’s participation in Crystal Cruise’s Crystal Visions Enrichment Program when it first surfaced last month, but thanks to Sen. McCaskill for the reminder.

And for, well, the cut.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Evaluating E-Cigarettes Is a Drag

Splendid readers! The hardlysmoking staff could use your help in sorting this headscratcher out.

Over the past several days we’ve encountered two radically different reports on the relative merits/hazards of electronic cigarettes, and we can’t quite figure out which one is right.

Or if both are.

Start with this piece in The Guardian (tip o’ the pixel to the Daily Beast).

Vaping: e-cigarettes safer than smoking, says Public Health England

Government body says vaping can make ‘significant contribution to endgame of tobacco’ and raises concerns about length of licensing process

Vaping is safer than smoking and could lead to the demise of the traditional cigarette, Public Health England (PHE) has said in the first official recognition that e-cigarettes are less damaging to health than smoking tobacco.

The health body concluded that, on “the best estimate so far”, e-cigarettes are about 95% less harmful than tobacco cigarettes and could one day be dispensed as a licensed medicine in an alternative to anti-smoking products such as patches.

Helpful chart:

Screen Shot 2015-08-21 at 12.04.23 AM

As far as e-cigs being a gateway to cigarette smoking, the PHE study says that kind of thinking is, well, vapid.

The review found that almost all of the 2.6 million adults in the UK now thought to be using e-cigarettes are current or former conventional smokers, most using them to help them quit tobacco or to prevent them going back to smoking.

There was no suggestion that the products were a gateway into tobacco smoking, with less than 1% of adults or young people who had never smoked becoming regular cigarette users.

But . . .

The same day, this report appeared in the Wall Street Journal.

Teens Who Use E-Cigs Found Likelier to Smoke

Ninth-graders who used electronic cigarettes were more likely to smoke cigarettes, cigars or hookahs than peers who never tried the battery-powered devices, a study in the Journal of the American Medical Association found.

The research is some of the first to address fear among health officials that e-cigarettes could become a gateway to traditional cigarettes. The results come as the largely unregulated $3.5 billion e-cigarette industry faces mounting criticism from health groups and lawmakers concerned about teens using the devices, which heat liquid nicotine into vapor.

The study focused on ninth-graders at 10 public schools in Los Angeles who had tried e-cigarettes before the fall of 2013. Researchers surveyed those students in the spring of 2014 and fall of 2014, and discovered that they were about 2½ times as likely as their peers to have smoked traditional cigarettes, five times as likely to have smoked cigars, and three times as likely to have smoked hookahs.

Helpful chart:

Screen Shot 2015-08-21 at 12.15.58 AM

So . . . what?

Teens are four times more likely to use real cigarettes? Or barely likely to move from vaping to flaming?

Inquiring minds want to know.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Starbucks Is Not Just a Coffee Shop

You think the Seattle-based coffee chain is just a place to plant yourself, open your MacBook Air, and drink some overpriced Charbucks Latte?

No.

Starbucks is not just another outpost in Laptopistan.

Starbucks is . . . a lifestyle brand.

A . . . culture broker.

Starbucks wants to be a player in the art world (see the ill-fated Starbucks Salon). In the film industry (Akeelah and the Bee, anyone?). In music with the Opus Collection (which one critic pointed out is actually the Collection Collection). In politics with Starbucks founder Howard Schultz’s goo-goo ads.

And in the book business.

From Tuesday’s New York Times (and Wall Street Journal):

 

Screen Shot 2015-08-19 at 1.20.47 AM

 

Nut graf:

 

Screen Shot 2015-08-20 at 1.45.31 AM

 

Everyone – Facebook, Google, you name it – wants to own popular culture.

Starbucks is getting its share.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

First White House Transgender Hire Is From Brookline

The nation’s much-heralded transgender moment has finally ascended to America’s Big House.

From the Washington Blaze:

In first, White House hires openly trans staffer

Raffi_Freedman-Gurspan_insert_courtesy_NCTE

The White House for the first time has hired an openly transgender person as a member of its staff, LGBT advocates and the Obama administration announced Tuesday. Raffi Freedman-Gurspan, who formerly served in trans advocacy as policy adviser for the National Center for Transgender Equality’s Racial & Economic Justice Initiative, has been appointed to a senior position in the White House Office of Presidential Personnel. She’s set to begin her new role as an outreach and recruitment director in the Presidential Personnel Office on Tuesday.

But here’s the best part, via the Daily Beast: “Freedman-Gurspan was adopted from Honduras and raised in Brookline, Massachusetts.”

Can we get an Amen?

Okay, how about a mazel tov.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Wait, What? They Like Ike Memorial?

As the hardworking staff noted last fall, The Weekly Standard’s senior editor Andrew Ferguson has been on the Eisenhower Memorial debacle like Brown on Williamson.

Then there’s Frank Gehry, the starchitect who designed MIT’s Stata Center among other landmark buildings. His Looney-Tunes design just got green lighted for the Eisenhower Memorial, a historic fiasco chronicled for the ages by the redoubtable Andrew Ferguson in the Weekly Standard last month.

Now comes the latest chapter in the Five-Star Folly. From Ferguson’s editorial in the current edition of The Weekly Standard:

Dole, Gehry, and Ike

EDIT.v17-25.Mar12.Ferguson.Newscom

Like Lazarus, or maybe Frankenstein’s monster, the appalling plan for the Eisenhower Memorial in Washington, D.C., appears to be sputtering to life once more. Only two months ago it seemed safely kaput.

The design by “starchitect” Frank Gehry aims for a deconstructionist fantasy that scatters its elements (massive stone blocks, a few statues, a vast metallic screen hoisted between 80-foot posts) across a chaotic city block just off the National Mall. It’s a sly insult to Dwight Eisenhower and the homespun virtues he typifies in the American imagination. And coming from the famously antibourgeois Gehry, it is very likely a pitiless joke—completely missed by its targets—on the aesthetic judgment of the bureaucrats and bumpkins responsible for preserving the integrity of the city’s memorials.

Yes, $60 million later, it was dead in the water – until, as Ferguson notes, “Bob Dole showed up.”

A Kansan like Ike, a genuine hero of the war effort that Eisenhower led, Dole has joined the commission’s new chairman, Kansas senator Pat Roberts, to lobby on behalf of the memorial . . .

Publicly Dole has expressed no opinion of Gehry’s design. He seems indifferent to it; what gets built is less important to him than when it gets built, and the sooner the better.

Because World War II veterans would “like to be around for the dedication,” Dole says.

We’ve always admired Bob Dole as a man (except when he mortgaged part of his soul during the 1996 presidential campaign), but his push for the Eisenhower Memorial feels totally compromised.

Then again, it seems to be effective: The Eisenhower Commission is pushing Congress to allocate another $60 million to begin construction.

One more riff from Ferguson:

Though the point is seldom explicitly made, the legacy of the greatest generation is decidedly mixed. It certainly got the big things right—saving the world from unspeakable tyranny, for example. In matters of architecture, design, and public planning, however, the greatest generation was a disaster, and for this reason: It lacked the confidence to question the say-so of frauds and cynics and ideologues who called themselves experts—whether in scholarship, social sciences, architecture, or art.

Our take:

This whole enterprise is a shonda, and the Gehry design defiles the memory of Dwight Eisenhower and the many good people who died for this country.

Someone should put an end to it.

Paging Donald Trump . . . paging Mr. Donald Trump . . . 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Ickiest Quote o’ the . . . Ever (Donald Trump Edition)

From our Quote o’ the Day desk

Yesterday, Politico (who else? well, maybe BuzzFeed) ran this exhaustive/exhausting listicle.

The 199 Most Donald Trump Things Donald Trump Has Ever Said

Would you vote for this man?

tfc-0814-cover-lede

1. “… don’t let the brevity of these passages prevent you from savoring the profundity of the advice you are about to receive.” (How to Get Rich, 2004)
2. “I am a really smart guy.” (TIME, April 14, 2011)
3. “I’m intelligent. Some people would say I’m very, very, very intelligent.” (Fortune, April 3, 2000)
4. “I know what sells and I know what people want.” (Playboy, March 1990)
5. “I have a great relationship with the blacks. I’ve always had a great relationship with the blacks.” (Albany’s Talk 1300, April 14, 2011)

But it was this one that really gave us the creeps.

32. “… she does have a very nice figure. I’ve said if Ivanka weren’t my daughter, perhaps I’d be dating her.” (ABC’s “The View,” March 6, 2006)

That’s messed up, yo.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

The Arts Seen in Western Mass. (Summer of Whistler Edition)

Well the Missus and I trundled out to the Berkshires for a couple of days last week to catch this & that and, say, it was . . . swelling with people.

Upon our arrival in Williamstown we headed right to the Clark Museum to see Whistler’s Mother: Grey, Black, and White (through September 27). But we couldn’t find a parking spot within half a mile of the joint.

“Hey – everyone wants to see Whistler’s mother,” I said to the Missus.

So we hied ourselves instead to to the Williams College Museum of Art, and good for us, since we happily spent the entire day there amid a fabulous array of exhibitions.

Not to mention the dottiest group of people per square foot this side of Donald Trump Campaign Headquarters.

There was, for instance, the old gal who hung her cane on a 17th century side chair in the Three Centuries of American Art exhibit (through October 4).

And then there was the guy who draped himself all over George Segal’s Open Doorway for a selfie, even though there was a sign that said “Don’t cross this line to get a selfie with the sculpture.”

Whatever.

We spent most of our time at three other exhibits.

First, Whistler Close-Up (through October 18).

Whistler_Note-in-Red_x1200

Study James McNeil Whistler’s gossamer brushwork and delicate use of line, with which he created some of the most beautiful—and most controversial­­—artwork of the nineteenth century. Featuring a group of exquisite small paintings on loan from the Terra Foundation for American Art along with prints from WCMA’s collection, some in multiple states, the installation lends itself to the exploration of Whistler’s artistic process and creative choices.

The museum provided magnifying glasses (especially helpful in examining Whistler’s etchings/drypoints) to facilitate our study.

Then it was on to The Loosening of Time: Maurice and Charles Prendergast (through August 30), a wonderful exhibit described this way:

The work of Maurice and Charles Prendergast oscillated in and out of its own time. The Prendergasts combined their knowledge of historic and modern art with observations of contemporary life to develop hybrid approaches to making art. This exhibition explores how a flexible concept of time figured across their artistic practices through subject matter, materials, and technique.

MauricePrendergast_BathersByTheSea_x1200

The Loosening of Time includes paintings, works on paper, decorative objects and ephemera drawn from WCMA’s extensive Prendergast holdings—the largest collection in the world.

It’s terrific – especially in chronicling the work of overshadowed brother Charles, an accomplished painter and woodcarver.

Finally, we meandered into Warhol by the Book (through August 16), which features a staggering collection of Andy Warhol’s book-related creations.

“The implicit message of ‘Warhol By the Book’—a show at once weightless and massive, opaque and revelatory–is to affirm what a literary sensibility its subject had.”—Boston Globe

Andy Warhol lived and breathed books. From his student days in the 1940s to his death in 1987, Warhol experimented wildly with form and content, turning traditional notions of media and authorship on their heads. He co-produced a satirical cookbook mocking fashionable French recipes; held coloring parties for crowdsourcing his own promotional books; and designed a pop-up “children’s book for hipsters” featuring sound recordings, holograms, and a do-it-yourself nose job.

Representative samples:

 

Warhol_web_banner_x1200

 

(Lots of details in Mark Feeney’s fine Boston Globe  review.)

The icing on the birthday cake (Warhol would have been 87 the day we were there):

 

Screen Shot 2015-08-09 at 1.38.45 AM

 

It was an interesting conversation between Brown and Price, ranging from Brown’s breakthrough 1971 exhibit of Warhol’s early work (before the Brillo boxes and Campbell’s soup cans) to Brown’s publishing of Patti Smith’s first collection of poetry (and Robert Mapplethorpe’s first Polaroid pictures).

Afterward, as promised, there was cake and ice cream and champagne. I believe Andy would have approved.

That night we went to the Williamstown Theatre Festival (where the Missus and I actually brought the average age down) to see Unknown Soldier, a new musical by Michael Friedman (who wrote the music and lyrics to Bloody Bloody Andrew Jackson) and Daniel Goldstein.

In this haunting new musical created by writer Daniel Goldstein, Obie Award-winning composer Michael Friedman, and director Trip Cullman, Ellen Rabinowitz sets out to understand her past after she discovers an enigmatic photograph while cleaning out her deceased grandmother’s home. As she chases the truth about the soldier featured in the photo, Ellen is drawn into a tangle of historical facts and mysteries that lead her to surprising love stories and unexpected truths. Bringing together three WTF alumni, Unknown Soldier delves into memory and family mythology, asking how – or even whether – the past shows us who we are.

It was a sharp production with a splendid cast, but sadly, now it’s gone

* * * * * * *

Bright and early the next morning we were back at the Clark to see Whistler’s Mother, and I’m happy to report the old girl looks great. (We’d seen her a couple of times at the Musée d’Orsay, but this was special.)

Screen Shot 2015-08-11 at 11.41.10 PM

Arrangement in Grey and Black No. 1 (Portrait of the Artist’s Mother) (1871) by James McNeill Whistler is one of the most renowned works of art by an American artist. It is considered by many to be the most important American painting not on American soil. Better known as Whistler’s Mother, the painting has been owned by the French state since 1891 and is in the collection of the Musée d’Orsay, Paris. This summer the Clark Art Institute presents the painting as the centerpiece of an exhibition featuring a variety of Whistler’s prints and drawings, Japanese woodblock prints that inspired the artist, and ephemera that explore the image’s role in popular culture. The Clark is one of only two American venues featuring the painting this year, and is the only east coast museum to show the iconic painting.

As opposed to the monumental Depression-era tour the painting took across America in 1933.

That completed our Summer Whistler Trifecta – Williams College Museum of Art, Clark Museum, and the great Whistler in Paris, London, and Venice exhibit we saw at the Yale University Art Gallery last month.

Remarkably, we had the Whistler exhibit pretty much to ourselves, but that changed when we meandered back to the Clark’s main galleries. Turns out the mile-long crowd wasn’t here to see Old Lady Whistler; they were here to see Van Gogh.

Specifically Van Gogh and Nature (through September 13).

Foolish us.

Then again, even the usually art-smart Wall Street Journal is all Van Gogh-Go.

From the WSJ piece Five Summertime Art Road Trips.

The Clark Art Institute (Williamstown, Mass.)

The museum, which last year unveiled a new exhibition center and revamped its 140 acres of lawns and meadows in the Berkshires, is exhibiting “Van Gogh and Nature,” 49 paintings and drawings by the artist exploring his fascination with all things bucolic and wild. Works include “Olive Trees,” a landscape van Gogh painted while in an asylum in 1889, and “Green Wheat Fields, Auvers,” completed months before his death in 1890. The show is set to break special-exhibit attendance records at the Clark, which calls this the first museum show to focus exclusively on van Gogh’s connection to nature.

Not a word about Anna Whistler. For shame.

On our way home we swung by the Norman Rockwell Museum where we caught a lively, funny tour of the permanent collection and then immersed ourselves in Roz Chast: Cartoon Memoirs (through October 26).

It’s a hoot.

Representative sample:

 

Roz-Chast-15-2

 

Nice way to end a road trip.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

When Hillary Met Snapchat . . .

The 2016 presidential hopefuls are on mobile platforms like Brown on Williamson. Instagram, Pinterest, Snapchat, WhatsApp – WhatsEver.

But it’s not always pretty. Case in point: Hillary Clinton’s baptism by Snapchat this week.

The call:

 

Screen Shot 2015-08-11 at 12.26.15 AM

 

The response:

 

Screen Shot 2015-08-11 at 12.30.18 AM

 

Yikes.

And there’s lots more where that came from.

The moral of the story?

Damned if we know. But it’s probably not good.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments