Thomas Kinkade: Light-Fingered Painter

Self-styled “painter of light” Thomas Kinkade died last week, as the Sunday New York Times obits duly noted:

Thomas Kinkade, Artist to Mass Market, Dies at 54

Thomas Kinkade, the prolific painter of bucolic and idealized scenes who estimated that his mass-produced works hung in one out of 20 American homes, died on Friday at his home in Los Gatos, Calif. He was 54.

Nut graf:

Mr. Kinkade referred to himself as the “painter of light,” usually with a trademark symbol, for naturalistic scenes with highlights that appeared to glow. Often his canvases were mass-produced prints to which he added small, brightly toned details. He made no apologies for commercializing the art field, comparing himself to million-sellers in, say, music and literature.

Yes but he was no Charles Dickens, as Susan Orlean’s 2001 New Yorker takedown painstakingly illustrated (via Longform):

By and large, art critics consider Thomas Kinkade a commercial hack whose work is mawkish and suspiciously fluorescent, and whose genius is not for art but for marketing — for creating an “editions pyramid” of his prints, each level up a little more expensive, which whips up collectors’ appetites the way retiring Beanie Babies did. This view annoys Kinkade no end, and he will talk your ear off — even talk through the company’s strictly enforced one-hour interview limit — about the ugliness and nihilism of modern art and its irrelevance compared to the life-affirming populism of his work. He will point out that he has built the largest art-based company in the history of the world, and that ten million people have purchased a Kinkade product, at one of three hundred and fifty Thomas Kinkade Signature Galleries that carry his limited-edition prints, or through his Web site, or at one of the five thousand retail outlets that sell Kinkade-licensed products, including cards, puzzles, mugs, blankets, books, La-Z-Boys, accessory pieces, calendars, and night-lights. Last year, Media Arts Group had a hundred and thirty-two million dollars in revenues. It has been traded — first on the Nasdaq, then on the New York Stock Exchange — since 1994, making Kinkade the only artist to be a small-cap equity issue. He owns thirty-seven per cent of the company, which makes him, by his calculations, one of the wealthiest artists in the world.

Of course, if you’re the one out of 20 Americans whose home is festooned with a Kinkade, please feel free to contact the hardworking staff at the speed of light.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 7 Comments

Correction o’ the Day (II)

From Sunday’s New York Times:

MAGAZINE

The Riff column on Page 52 this weekend, about musical obscurity and how it is no longer an honor, misspells the surname of a singer about whom everybody knows something (or at least something other than her name). She is Lana Del Rey, not Ray.

Wait – what are we supposed to know?

About who?

The hardworking staff respectfully requests an Editor’s Note on this topic.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Correction o’ the Day (I)

From the New York Times Sunday Style section:

STYLE

The Possessed column last Sunday, about a dermatologist and his yoga mat, misspelled his given name. He is Fredric Brandt, not Frederic.

Seriously? There’s a “Possessed” column? And it showcased a dermatologist’s yoga mat?

Seriously?

Not to mention the accompanying photograph:

Frankly, the hardworking staff is rethinking its Why The New York Times Is A Great Newspaper series.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Dead Blogging The Lyonel Feininger Exhibit At The Harvard Art Museums

So the Missus and I trundled over to the Harvard Art Museums to catch Lyonel Feininger: Photographs, 1928–1939 and here’s some of what we saw:

From the Harvard Art Museums website:

One of the most versatile talents of the modern art movement in Germany, the American-born Lyonel Feininger (1871–1956) is celebrated as a master of caricature, figurative painting, and a distinctive brand of cubism, but he also created a fascinating body of photographic work that is virtually unknown. Drawn primarily from the artist’s own collection (now at Harvard University), this exhibition offers the first opportunity to consider his achievement within the medium. Focusing on the rich and productive period between 1928 and the late 1930s, when Feininger was experimenting with an array of avant-garde photographic techniques and printing his own work, these photographs range from early atmospheric night views made at the Bauhaus (where he took up the camera in 1928) to bird’s-eye views of New York City (where he settled permanently in 1937).

It’s a terrific show, and a nice follow-up to the Whitney’s recent landmark exhibition, Lyonel Feininger: At the Edge of the World.

Representative sample:

Both shows are well worth checking out, either online or in person.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Two Different Worlds (Chevy Volt Edition)

(First in a series of posts detailing the separate universes the liberal media and the conservative media inhabit.)

From Joe Nocera’s latest New York Times column about the “conservative propaganda machine” mocking the Chevy Volt hybrid (“containing both a 400-pound battery and a 9.3 gallon gas tank”) as an Obama-fueled money pit:

What is the connection between President Obama and the Volt? There is none. The car was the brainchild of Bob Lutz, a legendary auto executive who is about as liberal as the Koch brothers. The tax credit — which is part of the reason conservatives hate the car — became law during the Bush administration.

From the Weekly Standard’s recent Car Wars piece, which chronicles General Motors’ attempt to distance itself from the Obama administration and the attendant “Government Motors” designation the auto bailout occasioned:

The Volt is “the single most politicized automobile since the Corvair,” says car industry analyst Edward Niedermeyer of the website The Truth About Cars . . . 

Conservatives have latched onto the heavily subsidized Volt as a symbol of Obama’s meddling in the economy and misguided zeal for killing off gasoline-powered cars. Bill O’Reilly and Lou Dobbs of Fox News and Rush Limbaugh have led a chorus of Volt critics. An article in Forbes was headlined “How the Chevy Volt Is Like Obamacare.” Another in Townhall said the Volt is “the perfect car for the Occupy Wall Street crowd.”

Two different worlds.

P.S. The actual car:

Whatever.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Hey, FaceShnook: You’re Being Pixel-Pocketed!

The latest installment in the Wall Street Journal’s invaluable (and Pulitzer Prize-worthy) What They Know series is a wake-up call for every one of the 800 million+ Facebookniks.

Selling You on Facebook

Many popular Facebook apps are obtaining sensitive information about users—and users’ friends—so don’t be surprised if details about your religious, political and even sexual preferences start popping up in unexpected places.

Not so long ago, there was a familiar product called software. It was sold in stores, in shrink-wrapped boxes. When you bought it, all that you gave away was your credit card number or a stack of bills.

Now there are “apps”—stylish, discrete chunks of software that live online or in your smartphone. To “buy” an app, all you have to do is click a button. Sometimes they cost a few dollars, but many apps are free, at least in monetary terms. You often pay in another way. Apps are gateways, and when you buy an app, there is a strong chance that you are supplying its developers with one of the most coveted commodities in today’s economy: personal data.

Nut graf:

This appetite for personal data reflects a fundamental truth about Facebook and, by extension, the Internet economy as a whole: Facebook provides a free service that users pay for, in effect, by providing details about their lives, friendships, interests and activities. Facebook, in turn, uses that trove of information to attract advertisers, app makers and other business opportunities.

In other words: Facebook is the marketer. You are the product.

Get used to it.

Originally posted on the Newer! Improveder! Sneak ADtack!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Boston Herald Achieves Tabloid Nirvana

All too often the Boston Herald is merely a lively index to the Boston Globe – not reckless or lurid enough to rival uber-tabloids like the New York Post or the Daily News.

But today’s Herald is something special.

Exhibit A:

Cops: Husband killed, ate wife

With his mother dead in a blood-soaked bedroom and his father sitting on the floor next to her — apparently having feasted on his wife’s flesh — a man who’d moved his elderly parents from China to Shrewsbury mere months ago found himself helpless in the face of a horrific discovery that has shaken and shocked even veteran law enforcement officials.

“It’s a very disturbing scene,” Worcester District Attorney Joseph Early Jr. said of the carnage that unfolded in a tidy condo complex where authorities say Jiemieng Liu, 79, murdered his wife, Yuee Zhou, 73, then ate part of her forearm and chanted a haunting mantra — “This is not your mother” — when their adult son arrived.

“I haven’t seen this in Worcester County,” Early said of the apparent cannibalism. “None of the police officers that were working the scene have seen this type of homicide before.”

Yikes.

Exhibit B:

Killer’s bid for new trial stirs ‘rage’ in victim’s dad

A bid for a new trial by the man convicted of kidnapping, raping and killing Robert Curley’s 10-year-old son had him in a rage on Good Friday, of all days.

“It’s Easter weekend, and I’m sitting here like I want to kill this guy. It’s crazy,” Curley said of 57-year-old Charles Jaynes, the man convicted of killing his son.

“No time is good time to feel this way, but particularly on Easter weekend, I’ve got to sit here with all this rage and hatred, and be all riled up,” he said. “He has a glimmer of hope that he may get out of prison one day. And I don’t want him to have any hope that he may get out of there.”

Double yikes.

To paraphrase e.e. cummings, How do you like your blueeyed tabloid, Mr. Death?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

A Chart Is Worth A Thousand Words

Trouble in Democratic FundraisingLand, via the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times.

First, the Journal:

Super PAC Money Stalled Despite Obama Greenlight

After Bill Burton failed to win the job of White House press secretary last year, he took a position nobody else wanted—helping lead a super PAC to help re-elect the president.

At the time, President Barack Obama was openly hostile to super PAC fundraising for giving rich donors more influence. Now, Mr. Obama and senior advisers who passed over Mr. Burton are reliant on the 34-year-old Buffalo, N.Y., native to help them stay employed a second term.

So far, they have cause for worry. Mr. Burton’s super PAC, Priorities USA Action, and a companion nonprofit group was at the end of February about one-tenth of the way toward its goal of raising $100 million, struggling with inexperience and missteps against more successful super PACs supporting Republican candidates.

Helpful chart:

Next, the Times:

Republican Committee Makes Big Turnaround on Fund-Raising

Once teetering on the edge of bankruptcy and irrelevance, theRepublican National Committee has raised more than $110 million over the past 15 months and retired more than half its debt, accumulating large cash reserves that could give Mitt Romney a critical boost later this spring as he intensifies his campaign against President Obama.

Helpful chart:

That far outstrips the Democratic National Committee, “which raised about $137 million during the same period but also spent far more.”

All of which puts the GOP in much better shape for what the Journal describes as the bottom line:

The Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan group that tracks campaign spending, said both sides could raise as much as $6 billion for the 2012 election, including spending by super PACs and other outside groups. In 2008, the two sides spent $2.9 billion in the presidential race, the center said.

All those dollars and no sense, eh?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tim Cahill Watch: Collateral Damage?

Throughout this week’s Cahillpalooza over the former Treasurer’s indictment on public corruption charges, one question has gone unasked:

What about Makena?

Tim Cahill’s daughter has been writing a regular column for the Herald (samples here and here), but does she get to keep doing it now? Most of the Herald columnists have supported her old man, but the editors sure haven’t.

No hints on her Twitter feed, so we’ll just have to wait and see. But it’s always the kids who suffer, no?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

It’s Good To Live In A Two-Daily Town (Tim Cahill Indictment Edition III)

Day Three of Cahillpalooza features contrasting coverage in the local dailies.

Both have news stories about former Treasurer Tim Cahill pleading not guilty in a Suffolk County court to charges of public corruption.

Boston Globe:

Cahill pleads not guilty to charges

AG alleges former treasurer bypassed lottery managers

Boston Herald:

AG: Tim Cahill gambled on image boost

But as often happens in cases like this, the Herald had something extra, starting with Margery Eagan’s column:

Making a mountain out of a Cahill?

(Hey – I said that too!)

Lede:

Are criminal indictments against Tim Cahill good or bad for the political future of Attorney General Martha Coakley, long criticized for failing to go after corruption around here?

I was stunned yesterday by all the political insiders, Democrats and Republicans, whose sentiments were similar to a longtime operative who told me this: “She has done something that no one else could do. Martha Coakley has made me feel sorry for Tim Cahill.”

All those folks (and all the journalists who’ve questioned Coakley’s criminal pursuit of Cahill) got a good scolding from the Herald editorial page:

Crossing the line

Folks in this town who really ought to know better have responded to the corruption charges against Tim Cahill by suggesting that there’s more smoke to Attorney General Martha Coakley’s case than fire. We invite anyone who thinks Cahill’s actions in 2010 fell into a legal gray area to peruse the commonwealth’s statement of the case against the former treasurer.

And etc.

It’s worth reading the whole piece, though, because it’s one more indication of how Rorschachy the Cahill case has become.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment