Why Is There No “Keep Boston Weird” Campaign?

From yesterday’s Wall Street Journal:

Asheville, N.C. Debates: How Weird is Too Weird?

Topless Rally Raises Eyebrows, Questions

ASHEVILLE, N.C.—This city has made a name for itself as a tourist and retirement haven, known for its arts festivals, spiritual retreats and welcoming culture.

But a topless rally here Sunday prompted even locals who want to “Keep Asheville Weird” to question if weird is a sustainable economic model, especially in a downturn.”Being strange is one of the things we have in our favor, that people feel comfortable here,” said Patti Best, who sells her paintings in downtown galleries. But Ms. Best said she worries about blurring the line between being accepting and being offensive. “Asheville has a lot of attraction for families, and they aren’t going to come to a place that’s veering so far out of the mainstream,” she said.

Although the Journal didn’t mention it, the Asheville campaign mirrors Austin, TX’s Keep Austin Weird effort.

So what the hardweirding staff wants to know is: Why no “Keep Boston Weird” campaign?

(And don’t give us any Future Boston Alliance booshwah: That group is lamer than David Ortiz.)

Truth is, Boston’s not weird.

It’s just lame wired.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 5 Comments

Quote o’ the Day (Are You Kidding, Marco Rubio? Edition)

From Mediaite:

Rubio: ‘This Is As Ugly And As Nasty A Political Campaign As I Have Seen’

Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio appeared on Fox & Friends on Monday where he was asked to open up about his role at this week’s Republican nominating convention and also about the current state of the presidential race. Rubio said that this campaign is as “ugly and nasty” as any he has witnessed.

Marco Rubio is 41 years old.

Which means he was minus-seven-years-old when Lyndon Johnson’s Daisy ad ran.

Which means he was minus-three-years-old when Chicago mayor Richard Daley bludgeoned protesters at the ’68 Democratic convention.

Which means he was aware – maybe – of the 1988 Willie Horton campaign and the subsequent presidential races, none of which can hold a candle to the current race, despite the New Republic’s protestations.

Which means Marco Rubio is an idiot.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The New Yorker: Red Sox Bums Russian

As if Boston weren’t in enough baseball turmoil, now it turns out that the Red Sox are the Evil Empire.

Or so says the New Yorker:

THE RED SOX ARE THE U.S.S.R.

One of the greatest rivalries in professional sports history was surely that between the Red Sox and Yankees from 2003 to 2011. They were the best teams in baseball many of those years. They participated in two of the greatest playoff series of all time. They brawled. They fought over free agents. The Yankees were generally slightly better, but the Red Sox still triumphed in two World Series. They were like the United States and the Soviet Union in the Cold War. But, now, as then, we have a winner.

And on it goes, comparing the Red Sox in 2012 to the Soviet Union in 1989. “They tried to keep up financially, and intellectually, with their rival for many years. Glasnost has passed; the end is here.”

Under this theory, “[Carl] Crawford is like Kazakhstan, expensive but troubled; [Josh] Beckett is Georgia, valuable but liable to start a war; Nick Punto, the throw-in utility infielder is Moldova; [Adrian] Gonzalez, the valuable breadbasket, is the Ukraine. And John Lackey, the grumpy pitcher who stays behind, is now Chechnya.”

Which of course makes Bobby Valentine Boris Yeltsin, “the disruptive, late arrival.”

Just one more role to fill: Who plays Ronald Reagan?

[Five second interval goes here.]

That’s right! Brian Cashman, “the the man who kept spending and spending, driving the Red Sox into delirium and then oblivion.

So how do you like your Evil Empire now, Red Sox Nation?

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

It’s Good To Live In A Two-Daily Town (Globe, Herald Agree On Red Sox Edition)

Mirabile dictu! The Globe and the Herald in lockstep! See IGTLTDT for details.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Arthur Bris-Bane Of The New York Times’ (Digital Media) Existence

New York Times Public Editor Arthur S. Brisbane published his swan column yesterday, and the Old Grey Lady can’t be happy about it.

Brisbane was a disappointing ombud – not as sharp as Clark Hoyt, not nearly as lyrical as Daniel Okrent.

But he definitely went out with a bang, not a whimper.

High/lowlights:

• The emphasis on social and mobile media means that Times material appears far from the home base of NYTimes.com, not to mention the distant shores of the Old Country, print. For journalists, this presents tantalizing new opportunities to build a personal audience, while for the company it is a way to follow readers where they are going.

The result is an oddly disaggregated New York Times of hyper-engaged journalists building their own brands, and company content flung willy-nilly into the ether.

• The Times is hardly transparent. A reader still has to work very hard to find any Times policies online (though some are tucked away there), and there is still no place where Times editors speak on the issues. As for humility, well, The Times is Lake Wobegon on steroids (everybody’s way above average). I don’t remember many autopsies in which, as we assembled over the body, anyone conceded that maybe this could have been done differently.

• I also noted two years ago that I had taken up the public editor duties believing “there is no conspiracy” and that The Times’s output was too vast and complex to be dictated by any Wizard of Oz-like individual or cabal. I still believe that, but also see that the hive on Eighth Avenue is powerfully shaped by a culture of like minds — a phenomenon, I believe, that is more easily recognized from without than from within.

• As a result, developments like the Occupy movement and gay marriage seem almost to erupt in The Times, overloved and undermanaged, more like causes than news subjects.

• It’s a huge success story — it is hard to argue with the enormous size of Times Nation — but one that carries risk as well. A just-released Pew Research Center survey found that The Times’s “believability rating” had dropped drastically among Republicans compared with Democrats, and was an almost-perfect mirror opposite of Fox News’s rating. Can that be good?

Clearly, Brisbane believes it’s not.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

It’s Good To Live In A Two-Daily Town (Herald Gives Globe Plagiarism A Free Pass Edition)

On Friday the Boston Globe admitted that an August 17th editorial had ripped off major portions from Todd Domke’s WBUR.org column. No word yet from the Globe about repercussions, and – uncharacteristically –  no word at all from the Boston Herald. Details at IGTLTDT.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

The Sneak In Review (Branded Content Edition)

Check out Sneak Adtack’s weekly roundup for the latest in stealth marketing/branded content from Macy’s and Nine West.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Peggy Noodnik Writes Again (Mitt Romney’s Sense Of Humor Edition)

Peggy Noonan, the Annie Hall of the chin-strokerati (see: any of her Meet the Press appearances), has outdone herself – or is that, undone herself? – in this week’s Wall Street Journal column, headlined “America Meets Mr. Romney.”

In it, Noonan gives Romney some free advice, starting with this:

If you want to lead America, you have to speak to the fix we’re in, and that means addressing spending. But economic probity has a friend called economic growth, and that is what people care so much about—jobs, opportunity, the competitive advantage conferred by good policies. Are we a vital nation able to grow, to take on our true size again?

Emphasis is everything. Emphasize dynamism.

Mr. Romney shouldn’t just repeat what he thinks but tell people why he thinks it, what life has taught him that formed his views.

Noonan says, for starters, “he shouldn’t shy away from religion. Why should he? This is America.”

Which is exactly why he should shy away from Mormonism.

Not to get technical about it.

Beyond that, Noonan writes:

He must use humor, for three reasons. One is that wit breaks through and sharpens all points. Another is that it is natural to him . . .

Seriously? Every – we mean every – Romney attempt at humor has come off flatter than his approval ratings. Latest example: his birth certificate joke at a Michigan rally on Friday.

As for his vaunted sense of humor, here’s what Romney said to CBS’s Scott Pelley (via Politico’s Playbook):

PELLEY: “Why did you say that?”

ROMNEY: “We’re in Michigan – Ann and I both born in Detroit. And, of course, a little humor always goes a long way. So, it was great to be home – to be in a place where Ann and I had grown up, and the crowd loved it and got a good laugh.”

PELLEY: “But this was a swipe at the president, and I wonder why you took it.”

ROMNEY: “No, no – not a swipe. I’ve said throughout the campaign, and before: There’s no question about where he was born. He was born in the U.S. This was fun about us, and coming home. And humor – you know, we gotta have a little humor in a campaign, as well.”

PELLEY: “You threw a little red meat at the conservative wing of the party, there.”

ROMNEY: “No, this was all about being home in Michigan, the place we were born and raised.”

PELLEY: “But once and for all, for the record, you believe that Barack Obama is the legitimate president of the United States.”

ROMNEY, with strained smile: “I’ve said that probably 30 times by now … 31 certainly won’t hurt.”

But that birth certificate comment just might.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

It’s Good To Live In A Two-Daily Town (Red Sox Doubleheadline Edition)

The local dailies go to town on the Red Sox blockbuster trade. IGTLTDT sorts out which did a better job.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Correction o’ the Day (Naked Prince Harry Edition)

From yesterday’s New York Times:

INTERNATIONAL

An article on Thursday about the publication Tuesday on the Hollywood Web site TMZ of naked photographs of Britain’s Prince Harry in a Las Vegas hotel suite referred incorrectly to a front-page picture published by The Sun newspaper in Britain on Thursday. The Sun photo was styled like one of those on TMZ but featured a naked Sun staff member and a naked woman; it was not a photograph of a naked Prince Harry. (Confusion arose when late-night TV shows in Britain showed scanned versions of the Sun front page — hours before the tabloid newspaper hit the streets — and reported that the paper had broken an embargo by the Press Complaints Commission against publishing the pictures.)

Got that?

Better question: Who cares?

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment