WCVB Ripped Off By North Carolina Station?

Via MediaBistro’s TV Spy:

The Highest Form of Flattery? WNCT Airs Nearly Identical Promo as WCVB

Handy side-by-side video comparison:

Weird, eh? TV Spy explanation:

In February, WCVB’s Sean Kellytraveled to Kabul and reported on the work of a Massachusetts National Guard unit. Now, WNCT’s Chris Brown is in Afghanistan on a similar assignment.

[snip]

It turns out that Brown, as part of his preparation for making the trip, reached out to Kelly for advice. It was an informal sharing of ideas as Kelly gave Brown suggestions about equipment and travel.  As part of their conversations, Kelly shared some WCVB materials with Brown.

“There was a misunderstanding about what material of our’s [sic] that they could use,” said the WCVB spokesperson.

That’s very gracious of ABC-affiliate WCVB, since WNCT is a CBS affiliate.

Then again, presidential primary season is upon us, and who knows if the Tar Heel State will be pivotal?

Can’t hurt to hedge your bets.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Edward R Murrow On ‘What’s My Line?’

Via RTNDA:

Don’t miss the last two minutes.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Redemption Unit, VII

(Previously on The Redemption Unit: IIIIIIIVV, VI)

Pay It Backward

When the last claimant’s benefits had been redetermined and the government added up its losses, it immediately decided to recoup them by initiating the Overpayment Recovery Program. Letters went out – on green paper this time – telling claimants they had to come in to the DO. And the whole kabuki dance started all over again.

Claimant plunks green letter down on desk.  File comes out. Conversation begins.

“Mrs. Patterson, our records show that you were overpaid during the past two years by a total of $2162.”

“I never got no check for $2162.”

Conversation effectively ends.

In essence the Overpayment Recovery Program took people who’d just had their welfare checks cut, and cut them some more. One day my next-desk neighbor, Tricia McDermott, flipped a file across her desk and leaned back in her chair. Tricia was too compassionate for the job but too strait-laced not to do it by the book. She stared toward the windows and said to no one in particular, “What we need here is an overpayment recovery incentive. Do you think they’d ever consider giving us a cut of the take?”

“In this lifetime?”

“No, really – 10% off the top of any money we recover. We could limit it to refunds and exclude adjustments or returned checks.”

“Uh-huh.”

That there were three different ways to achieve a single result was pure SSA. Back then the Social Security system was virtually all exceptions and no rules (it may still be – I’ll find out in a few years). SSI wasn’t quite as bad, but it was still a contraption only Rube Goldberg could love. To make matters worse, the CRTs received a steady stream of what were called “claims transmittals” – memos that were supposed to clarify, but more often complicated, SSI’s crazy-quilt regulations.

Representative sample: “Transmit payment status code of WO4, WO5, or WO9. However, because of systems limitations do not input these PSCs. Use force pay to pay correct amount.” (SSIH, 13515-2)

So nobody read the transmittals. Except me. I figured I needed something on the plus side of the ledger to offset being chronically late and generally out of step. Consequently I read every transmittal, which probably was why I got the computer to do things no one else could.

In the course of my reading I also discovered that two obscure SSI regulations, when combined, essentially allowed a claims rep to waive any overpayment.

So that’s what I did.

A claimant would come in, sit down at my desk and wearily hand over his green letter.

“Yes. Mr. Randolph. Our records show – let’s see here – that during the past two years you were overpaid by $846.”

“I never got no check for $846.”

“That’s right, Mr. Randolph. This is really just a bookkeeping thing. I need you to sign a couple of forms and you’ll be all set.”

I had decided to hand-write the two forms each time; if I had a stack of copies around, they might accuse me of premeditated overpayment waiving. Better to have a sort of eureka element involved. I’d scribble out the forms, turn them toward the claimant, and spend a good five minutes convincing him to sign them. The claimant would walk away looking slightly puzzled. Then someone else would come to my desk with a green letter.

For a while my waive-‘em-all policy stayed under the radar. But I ran into problems when people began asking for me by name. Apparently word had gotten around the claimant community that I was the guy to see with your overpayment letter. So they would come into the DO and – completely disregarding SSI’s sophisticated system of assigning claimants alphabetically – say they wanted to be interviewed by me. Suddenly I was very much on the radar screen.

The Operations Supervisor came by one day and sat on the corner of my desk, an exercise always fraught with peril.

“You’re an asshole, but you know the system better than the bosses do. They hate that. What if everybody did what you’re doing?”

“Then I’d be a fool not to, like Yossarian said in Catch-22.”

“Sometimes it’s not so smart to be so smart. Too bad you won’t be around long enough to appreciate that.”

I started to think he was right, especially when management decided to walk me up the ladder – from OS to ADM to DM to AD. The drill was the same each time: I’d be summoned to the manager’s office, I’d sit down, and he’d say, “You can’t waive overpayments the way you’re doing. This is money that the claimants were not entitled to, and it’s your job to recover it from them.”

Each time my response was the same.

“I’m doing this by the book. It’s all there in the transmittals. You don’t like it, change the system.”

That, of course, was like saying make the Gabor sisters stop getting married.

“There’s nothing wrong with the system – there’s something wrong with you. What are you thinking, writing all these waivers?”

“I’m thinking that these people were overpaid through no fault of their own. They didn’t cheat the government; the government cheated the government. Why should they pay for that?”

“Because that’s what the regulations say.”

“The regulations also say overpayments can be waived under certain conditions, at the discretion of the claims rep. I’m just exercising my discretion.”

“Very poorly, I would say.”

“Yes, a CRT’s pay is nothing if not minimal.”

“Get out of here.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

RomneyFare®: Not So Good In NYT

Front-page piece in Sunday’s New York Times about the jobs-based focus of once and future presidential candidate Mitt Romney (R-Pretzel Logic), who undoubtedly wishes he’d been relegated to page A23.

Nut graf:

The message is well suited to Mr. Romney’s background as a successful executive and former governor, as well as the man who rescued the 2002 Winter Games from financial trouble. But it may also be his best opportunity to try to steer around criticism over the health care plan he created in Massachusetts, which to many Republicans looks distressingly similar to the federal law signed last year by Mr. Obama.

And it offers him a chance to sidestep the concerns of social conservatives, some of whom question his commitment to their causes and are uncomfortable with his Mormon faith.

That’s a tough twofer to overcome, and so far Romney’s ignoring the latter and fumbling the former. His defense of RomneyCare (rhymes with ObamaCare), according to the Times:

Mr. Romney defended the program again on Saturday night, saying that it was “unique to Massachusetts” and should not be imposed on other states. But his criticism of the national law — “I would repeal Obamacare, if I were ever in a position to do so,” he declared — has been overshadowed by his Republican rivals’ trying to conflate the two.

He devoted only a few moments of his speech to health care and tried to lighten the mood, saying: “You may have noticed that the president and his people spend more time talking about me and Massachusetts health care than ‘Entertainment Tonight’ spends talking about Charlie Sheen.”

Bada boom.

Romney had a chance to get out in front of the issues during the national healthcare debate last year but he punted, Republican strategists say:

“He made a huge mistake not litigating his health care record when Obamacare was on the table,” said Alex Castellanos, a Republican strategist who advised the early stages of Mr. Romney’s last race. “He should have been the leading opponent and said, ‘I can tell you better than anyone, don’t do this.’ But now he’s chosen to litigate this during a campaign, which is the worst time to do it.”

Worse times to come, presumably.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

MoDo Grabs The Big Chair At NYT

Before Frank Rich’s laptop is even cold, New York Times Op-It Girl Maureen Dowd has slipped into the paper’s Week in Review Spotlight Column (see dead-tree edition for what they call in D.C. “the optics”):

Governor Brown Redux: The Iceman Melteth

Jerry Brown doesn’t know who Charlie Sheen is.

“Is he related to the other Sheen?” he asks.

Brown has a vague sense that there was a meltdown with a TV star. But the former Governor Moonbeam is now Governor Laser Beam; the only meltdown he cares about is California’s, with its $26.6 billion budget shortfall.

“There’s only one game in my life,” he tells me, as we split Southwest Airlines peanuts and a turkey and cheese sandwich in a hotel at the corner of Disneyland Drive and Magic Way, where he has come to address a police convention.

The rest is pretty much standowd-issue stuff – from the overwrought (“In the fantastic, monastic world of Jerry Brown, the talk veers toward Wittgenstein, the collapse of the Habsburg Empire and preventing the collapse of the American empire.”) to the underwhelming (“Once, he baked in existential estrangement, opportunistically tilting at authority figures — challenging the leaders of his party and bristling at the large shadow of his charming Irish Catholic dad, Pat Brown, California’s governor in the ’60s. He knows there were sins of arrogance.”)

More existential estrangement to come.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

WSJ NOT The Assignment Desk For NPR

Yesterday the hardworking staff wondered if there was any relationship between the Wall Street Journal’s Weekend Interview with Paul Johnson and a segment on Weekend All Things Considered, since both compared the current Middle East uprisings with the widespread European revolutions in 1848.

So we wrote to ATC host Guy Raz and asked: Any connection between the two? Or is this the serendipity of contemporary news coverage?.

Here is his prompt and gracious response:

Greetings!

Thanks for your query and for listening to our program, Weekends on All Things Considered. The short answer is neither.

I am a big fan of Paul Johnson’s work. He’s an estimable figure. Unfortunately, I missed the piece you refer to that ran in the WSJ. I am happy to hear him make that comparison.

We’ve been mulling the 1848 idea for some weeks now but couldn’t quite figure out how to make it good radio until this weekend.

I saw Anne Applebaum make a brief reference to it in her WP column about 3 weeks ago and I thought it was smart. So we started to look around for historians who specialize in the revolutions of 1848. We found Jonathan Sperber at Univ. of Missouri who wrote a book on that period. And indeed, he was intrigued by the similarities between then and now. So we interviewed him and, voila! the sausage was made.

But now that I know about THIS blog…you can be sure I’ll be checking it out a lot for interesting ideas.

Thanks

Guy Raz

Host, Weekends on All Things Considered from NPR News

I guess after ten years in daily news, I just assumed everything was produced day-of.

I need to get out more often, eh?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Lit Crit At The Back Bay Borders

The Borders on Boylston/Newbury Street is one sad-assed retail outlet, what with its STORE CLOSING banners and “This Fixture Not For Sale” signs (not yet, anyway).

But the mood was lightened Saturday afternoon by a gaggle of girls sitting alongside the half-empty magazine racks. One girl, holding a paperback, loudly told the others: “Edith Wharton sucks. Don’t ever read Ethan Frome.”

Don’t ever, indeed.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

WSJ The Assignment Desk For NPR?

From the Wall Street Journal Weekend Interview with British historian Paul Johnson:

Mr. Johnson says he doesn’t follow politics closely anymore, but he quickly warms to the subject of the Middle East. The rash of uprisings across the Arab world right now is “a very interesting phenomenon,” he says.

“It’s something that we knew all about in Europe in the 19th century. First of all we had the French Revolution and its repercussions in places like Germany and so on. Then, much like this current phenomenon, in 1830 we had a series of revolutions in Europe which worked like a chain reaction. And then in 1848, on a much bigger scale—that was known as the year of revolutions.”

In 1848, he explains, “Practically every country in Europe, except England of course . . . had a revolution and overthrew the government, at any rate for a time. So that is something which historically is well-attested and the same thing has happened here in the Middle East.”

Then there’s this report from Saturday’s All Things Considered:

Revolutions in the Middle East have inspired many comparisons, but they may look more like the European revolutions of 1848. As University of Missouri professor Jonathan Sperber tells Guy Raz, 1848 — like the modern Middle East — saw a wave of working-class uprisings spurred by frustration with entrenched dictators, high food prices and a citizenry with new access to information.

Coincidence? The hardworking staff has no idea. So – in a spasm of actual reporting – we sent this email to Weekend All Things Considered host Guy Raz:

Dear Guy Raz,

I simultaneously write the Campaign Outsider blog and admire your work on Weekend All Things Considered.

Your segment on Saturday about revolutions in the Middle East inspiring comparisons with the European revolutions of 1848 resembled a Wall Street Journal interview with British historian Paul Johnson, who made many of the same observations.

Just curious: Any connection between the two? Or is this the serendipity of contemporary news coverage?

Many thanks for your consideration.

Sincerely,

The hardworking staff at Campaign Outsider

We’ll keep you posted.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Peggy Noodnik Gets It Right

Peggy Noonan routinely misfires in her Wall Street Journal column, but this week she’s entirely on target in her piece about the public-union rumpus currently raging from Wisconsin to New Jersey. Here’s what she says about the latter:

If the union leaders had been smart—if they’d had a heart!—they would have held a private meeting and said, “Look, the party’s over. We’ve done great the past 20 years, but now taxpayers are starting to resent us, and they have reason. They’re losing their benefits and footing the bill for our gold-plated plans, they don’t have job security and we do, taxes are high. We have to back off.”

They didn’t do this. It was a big mistake. And the teachers union made it just as two terrible but unrelated things were happening to their reputation. In what might be called an expression of the new spirit of transparency that is sweeping the globe, two documentaries came out in 2010, “The Lottery” and “Waiting for Superman.” Both were made by and featured people who are largely liberal in their sympathies, and both said the same brave thing: The single biggest impediment to better schools in our country is the teachers unions, which look to their own interests and not those of the kids.

More:

When union leaders negotiate with a politician, they’re negotiating with someone they can hire and fire. Public unions have numbers and money, and politicians need both. And politicians fear strikes because the public hates them. When governors negotiate with unions, it’s not collective bargaining, it’s more like collusion. Someone said last week the taxpayers aren’t at the table. The taxpayers aren’t even in the room.

I come from a union family (Teamsters, Printers), but credit where credit’s due: Noonan nailed it this time.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 11 Comments

Southie-Based ‘Good People’ Gets Good/Bad Reviews

The Missus and I saw David Lindsay-Abaire’s new play “Good People” in previews last month and loved it.

As did New York Times theater critic Ben Brantley:

Don’t make the mistake of thinking you understand Margaret Walsh from the get-go, because she’s not an easy gal to get a fix on. Not at first, anyway.

Embodied with an ideal balance of expertise and empathy by Frances McDormand, Margie (as her friends call her, using a hard “g”) is the not-quite heroine of David Lindsay-Abaire’s “Good People,” the very fine new play that opened Thursday night at the Samuel J. Friedman Theater. And discovering how Margie operates — and where she’s coming from — is one of the more subtly surprising treats of this theater season.

Ditto, says the Boston Globe’s Don (Road Trip!) Aucoin:

NEW YORK — With regard to dramas set in South Boston, the law of diminishing returns is bound to kick in at some point.

But not yet. Not when Southie can inspire a play like David Lindsay-Abaire’s “Good People,’’ which maps the fault lines of social class with a rare acuity of perception while also packing a substantial emotional wallop.

Not so much for the Wall Street Journal’s estimable theater critic Terry Teachout, who says the play is emotionally fraudulent:

“Good People” is, or purports to be, a study of life in Southie, a down-at-heel Boston neighborhood beloved of movie stars who think they can do the local accent. Mr. Lindsay-Abaire, who comes from a real-life Southie family, managed to land a scholarship to a tony New England prep school, which was his escalator to fame and fortune. All this undoubtedly explains the plot of “Good People,” in which Margie (Ms. McDormand, who works the charm pedal a bit too enthusiastically) is fired from her job as a clerk at a local dollar store, thus making it impossible for her to support her adult daughter, who was born prematurely and is severely handicapped (and who is kept offstage throughout the play, presumably so as not to shock the matinée crowd). In desperation, Margie looks up Mikey (Tate Donovan), an old high-school boyfriend who studied hard, became a doctor and now lives in a big house in a fancy suburb with his cute young wife (Renée Elise Goldsberry), who is—wait for it—an upper-middle-class black.

But wait – Teachout isn’t done with the virtues of luck over hard work:

Herein lies part of the phoniness of “Good People.” Of course people like Margie and Mikey exist, but I doubt it’s a coincidence that they are exactly the kinds of people who fit into the familiar sociological narrative that permeates every page of this play. In Mr. Lindsay-Abaire’s America, success is purely a matter of luck, and virtue inheres solely in those who are luckless. So what if Mikey worked hard? Why should anybody deserve any credit for working hard? Hence the crude deck-stacking built into the script of “Good People,” in which Mikey is the callous villain who forgot where he came from and Margie the plucky Southie gal who may be the least little bit racist (though she never says anything nasty to Mikey’s wife—that would be going too far!) but is otherwise a perfect heroine-victim.

Here’s the hardworking staff’s review: Go see the play yourself.

And give our regards to Broadway.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment