Is Rafael Nadal Conceding The U.S. Open?

In the runup to next week’s U.S. Open tennis tournament, defending champion Rafael Nadal is understandably doing a lot of media avails.

Such as this one for WWD:

Rafael Nadal’s Winning Ways

Behind the baseline, Rafael Nadal is known to be a tenacious competitor, but at Macy’s Armani Jeans shop Thursday night, he was all charm.

The 10-time Grand Slam winner smiled broadly throughout the meet-and-greet, lowering his head ever so slightly as some 400 fans chanted, “Rafa, Rafa.” Security guards marched up and down the floor’s main aisle trying to keep everyone, including scads of cellphone-snapping admirers, in check. After taking the train into the city from New Jersey and waiting an hour in the flagship, an autograph-seeking teenage fivesome from the Ramsey Tennis Team were armed and ready with tennis balls. While a few harped on his athletic skills and likability, Lauren Webb cut straight to the chase, “And he’s hot.”

Less so on the tennis court lately, but why get technical about it.

Regarding that, Nadal exhibited his trademark Rafability in the WWD interview:

Asked what is most challenging about competing he said, “Nothing. This is what I have done all my life. I practice every day and try my best in every moment. I try to think positive all the time. You never know when you are playing not-so-good, when you might start to play well. You just have to try your best in every moment.”

Regardless, Nadal has played second fiddle to Novak Djokovic’s virtuoso performance in men’s tennis finals all this year, losing five straight times to the Superb Serb. In Friday’s Wall Street Journal, Nadal addressed that drought directly:

“To beat him I had to be perfect, mental and tennis level, and I wasn’t,” Nadal said. “I’m happy about my year, not happy about my matches against Djokovic.”

There was also this in the WSJ piece:

Nadal said he would need time to regain the confidence, and the indomitable status, he had in 2010, when he became the first man since Rod Laver in 1969 to win the French Open, Wimbledon and the U.S. Open in the same season. He said that even if he wins the U.S. Open, he won’t feel in perfect mental condition until next year.

“I’m going to go and practice with the right attitude,” he said. “And hopefully next January I will be there competing at a little bit higher level than this year.”

In politics, that’s called playing the expectations game. In Nadalspeak, it’s setting the bar surprisingly low.

Coincidentally, Friday’s New York Times featured a front-page story on Djokovic’s new marketing potential:

Next Makeover for a New No. 1 Is in Marketing

MONTREAL — Pressed against a barricade, fans glimpsed Novak Djokovic and readied their cellphones. Necks craned. Cameras flashed. Djokovic, the Serb now deep into a historic tennis season, had created an impromptu mosh pit at a recent tournament here.

The scene underscored the defining characteristic of his season: change, on all fronts, with more promised. In the past year, in a relatively extreme makeover, Djokovic changed his serve, his diet, his publicist, his fitness regimen and, because of all of this, his standing in men’s tennis.

The next phase — making Djokovic a household name, among the world’s biggest sports stars — will continue next week in the United States Open, where he was named Wednesday the No. 1 seed in the men’s draw. While Djokovic has surpassed his rivals Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer on the tennis court, he now hopes to at least join those two, who both reside on Forbes magazine’s list of the top 10 most powerful athletes, in areas such as endorsements, fame and global exposure.

The truth is, from a marketing standpoint Novak Djokovic will never have what Rafael Nadal does. But from a tennis standpoint, he has exactly what Rafa wants.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Sharpton Says Matthews, Maddow Not Journalists

He’s barely had the job for 24 hours, and already new MSNBC squawk show host Al Sharpton is putting his foot perilously close to his mouth.

In the Daily Beast (via Romenesko) Sharpton counters the criticism that he’s just some affirmative-action hire who’s occupying a seat that rightfully belongs to a black journalist (who would not be an affirmative-action hire, presumably).

Regarding the latter charge, leveled by the National Association of Black Journalists,  Sharpton said this to Lloyd Grove:

“To be fair about it, the NABJ understood that if I didn’t get it, it wouldn’t have gone to a journalist. It’s a moot point. There are no journalists [as hosts] after 5 p.m. on MSNBC. Everyone after 5 deals with opinions. So the argument is kind of apples and oranges.”

What do those oranges think, though? Does Chris Matthews consider himself a journalist? Does Rachel Maddow consider herself a journalist? I’m guessing yes.

But Al Sharpton is saying no.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 11 Comments

New York Times In Bed With Steiner Sports

Full-page ad in Thursday’s New York Times:

Derek Jeter at The TimesCenter


Cozy, yes?

You have no idea.

The Times has been Steiner Sports’ BFF the past few months:

July 16, 2011 mash note.

July 14, 2011 mash note.

Another July 14, 2011 mash note.

July 11, 2011 mash note.

June 22, 2011 mash note.

And now this Jeter-Martinez-Winfield-palooza the Times is throwing.

Kind of makes you wonder, eh?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Agog At Google’s Finances

New York Times report:

Google Reaches $500 Million Settlement With Government

Google will pay $500 million to settle federal government charges that it has knowingly shown illegal ads for fraudulent Canadian pharmacies in the United States, the Justice Department announced on Wednesday.

That’s not the really interesting part. The really interesting part is this:

The $500 million fine covers both revenue that Google earned from the illegal advertisers and revenue that the rogue Canadian pharmacies received from American customers buying controlled drugs. Google had said in May that the fine decreased its quarterly profit by 22 percent.

The hardworking staff never claimed to be math wizards, but by our primitive calculation that adds up to a quarterly profit of $2.72 billion.

Multiply by four: $10.88 billion in profits per annum.

It Googles the mind.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Branded Entertainment: The Gift That Keeps on Giving

More and more marketers are turning to branded entertainment to promote themselves.

What is branded entertainment?

MediaPost’s Center for Media Research helpfully provides this definition:

Branded entertainment (also referred to as product integration or branded content) integrates a brand with an entertainment property (i.e., TV program, movie, video game, music and more), usually for a fee, to create an association between the brand and property.

For examples, see Sneak Adtack here and here.

As for the current prospects of branded entertainment, the Center for Media Research helpfully provides this statistic:

According to a new survey from the ANA (Association of National Advertisers), nearly 63% of client-side marketers plan to participate in branded entertainment projects in 2012, making branded entertainment a common marketing strategy for many companies.

Why?

The top three reasons why marketers are finding it beneficial are:

·      The ability to make a stronger emotional connection with the consumer (78%)

·      The ability to align their brand with relevant content (75%)

·      The ability to build brand affinity with a desired target group or demographic (73%)

The most popular forms of branded entertainment being used, says the report, include commercial TV, the Internet, and sporting events / venues.

Translation:

A lot more of what you see on TV and the web will be marketing material disguised as programming content.

Forewarned is forearmed.

Originally posted on Sneak Adtack

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Free The Jack Shafer One!

Slate has announced layoffs that include media critic Jack Shafer (via Romenesko).

Shafer says he’ll continue to be a contributor to Slate, but still, that’s just wrong.

O tempora! O moreso!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Let The Rick Perry-And-Thrust Begin! (Romney Iowa Edition)

On NPR’s All Things Considered Wednesday, host Robert Siegel had this exchange with reporter Don Gonyea:

SIEGEL: Don, in his campaign so far, Mitt Romney has really not campaigned against his Republican rivals. He’s kept the focus on campaigning against Barack Obama. He hopes he’ll be the nominee next year.

Now that there’s a poll out showing that Rick Perry has surged ahead of him, do you hear anything different from the Romney campaign about what he’s going to say about his Republican rivals?

GONYEA: So far, the focus has been on President Obama and a general election matchup, but his team will be looking at those poll numbers today and they may, indeed, realize that they need to start going after Governor Perry.

Cut to the Des Moines Register’s invaluable Iowa Caucuses blog:

Romney beefs up Iowa leadership team – with two Pawlenty supporters

That’s Exhibit A in Romney’s reassessment of ceding the Iowa caucuses to . . . well, Rick Perry right now.

Meanwhile, anyone else wondering how Mitt’s feeling about longtime consigliere Eric Fehrnstrom’s @CrazyKhazei capers on behalf of his other major client, Sen. Scott Brown (R-Am I Inoculated Yet?).

Blue Mass Group has all the details.

We’re guessing Eric’s in the red with both his meal tickets.

P.S. Can @ScarinWarren be far behind?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Let The $4 Billion Rumpus Begin! (Destroying The American Dream Edition)

Democracy for America, the advocacy group ginned up by Howard Dean (your scream goes here), has purchased airtime on this Sunday’s squawk shows for an ad that, according to AlterNet, “takes the GOP to task for its inability to create jobs and for grinding away at the the promise of the American dream.”

The spot:

The transcript:

We were city workers in New York State, luckily we had good benefits. We would like to grow old comfortably and get back what we contributed. We would like to see those that we love have the same.

-Samuel and Stephanie Levine, Retired

I came to the United States when I was 10 years old, because this is the land of opportunity. But opportunities are disappearing on us because Washington has decided to protect millionaires and billionaires and squeeze the middle class. That is not the American dream.

-Millie Herrera, Small Business Owner

The American dream is having security and knowing that your kids can have security too.

-Chris Ossman, Engineer

To be able to live a decent life, free of fear about the next medical bill.

-Samuel Levine, Retired

Being able to get a great education, the greatest in the world.

-Austin Brookley, Student

The American dream is not just to make a profit in our business, but to be able to sleep at night and know that we are going to be okay.

– Annette Taddeo, Small Business Owner

But the basic needs of this country are being threatened by what’s going on in Washington.

-Chris Ossman, Engineer

We can’t let Republicans in Washington kill the American Dream.

-Millie Herrera, Small Business Owner

 That pretty much covers the waterfront, eh?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Nicolas Sarkozy’s Thé Party

Diminutive French president Nicolas Sarkozy ((B)UMP- Carla Bruni) seems to be channeling America’s Tea Party lately. From the New York Times:

PARIS — President Nicolas Sarkozy has used the crisis over the euro and his relationship with the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, to set a potential political trap for the Socialist opposition less than nine months before the French presidential election.

Hoping to show the French that he is a man of stature and responsibility, Mr. Sarkozy is pressing for a constitutional amendment to promote a balanced budget and making it a litmus test of fiscal responsibility for the Socialists, who oppose it.

Mr. Sarkozy has previously floated an idea he calls “the golden rule,” a legal requirement for a balanced budget, and a weak version has passed both houses of Parliament, where his center-right party has a majority. The Socialists voted against it, calling it a political maneuver and a “communications operation.”

The French left has also said “The deficit is the bastard child of the right, a mixture of ideological choices and payoffs for its electoral clients.”

Compare and contrast, in clear idiomatic English, the American left’s response to the balanced-budget-amendment crowd, compliments of California congresswoman Maxine Waters (D-Water This):

“The Tea Party can go straight to hell.”

Which political discourse would you rather be part of?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Campaign Outsider Suck-Up Ad o’ the Week

A coalition of the United Healthcare Workers East (a.k.a. 1199 SEIU), the Greater New York Hospital Association, and the Healthcare Education Project (which is just a front group for the previous two outfits) ran full-page ads on Tuesday in the Boston Globe and the New York Times thanking the Massachusetts and New York Congressional delegations for “[taking] a stand against cutting funding for healthcare.”

(Sorry, no images available because they’re just not that organized.)

But the message is clear: You scratch our back, we’ll scratch you back.

Business as usual in the leftosphere.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment