Soupy Sales Revisited

In my sendoff to the posthumously lionized (Pookie would be pleased) Soupy Sales, I foolishly left out the estimable-but-meshugge private detective Philo Kvetch.

Grace note for the jazz-loving Milton Supman:

Sad that he’s gone, but it’s been a hoot watching clips of his WNEW show in New York, which ran from when I was 13 until I was 17.

Outside of Bugs Bunny, Soupy Sales – and “Fractured Fairy Tales” (in a photo finish with my Mom) – had the biggest influence on me during my adolescence.

I’ll be eternally grateful.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

O’Really? Part Two

From our Strange Interlude™ file:

In all the excitement over seeing Bill O’Reilly at BU’s Gala Alumni Weekend Hoedown, I  failed to mention the guy who walked up to me and said, “You’re Jay Severin, right?”

It was almost as rich as when Severin himself walked up to me at a holiday party several years ago and called me Alex Beam.

I’m pretty sure Alex wouldn’t be any happier about that than Severin was.

Numbers Racket

Also during his star turn at BU, O’Reilly said that six million people watch him every night.

Not to get technical about it, but the number is actually about 3.5 million.

That audience inflation has led the hardworking staff at Campaign Outsider to formulate our official Bill O’Reilly Verbal Markdown©:

Reduce everything the Factor Actor says by 40%.

Happy calculating.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

“Precious” Revenues

So it turn out Sunday’s New York Times magazine cover story – “The Audacity of ‘Precious’” – isn’t just the potential viper’s nest of identity politics and PC policing that the hardworking staff at Campaign Outsider flagged yesterday.

It’s also a potential source of revenue.

An ad in Friday’s Times says “Lionsgate Invites You to Be a Part of A Special Screening Program for New York Times Readers.” It promotes advance screenings of the film “Precious” in New York, Philadelphia, Chicago, Los Angeles, and San Francisco.

Surrounding the film, though, is a Rubik’s Cube of Hollywood finagling, which only makes the Times entanglement look more suspect.

No reasonable media observer would begrudge newspapers access to legitimate sources of income.

It just depends on your definition of legitimate.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Soupy Sales, R.I.P.

The great TV jester Soupy Sales has taken the Big Pie in the Face.

The Associated Press obit notes:

Soupy Sales, the rubber-faced comedian whose anything-for-a-chuckle career was built on 20,000 pies to the face and 5,000 live TV appearances across a half-century of laughs, died yesterday. He was 83.

The AP piece also cites the signature Soupy Sales pitch:

Mr. Sales, who was typically clad in a black sweater and oversized bow-tie, was suspended for a week after telling his legion of tiny listeners to empty their mothers’ purse and mail him all the pieces of green paper bearing pictures of presidents.

But what I remember most is the musical tour de force “(Hold Your Head and Shout) Your Brains Will Fall Out” (sorry, can’t find a link) . . .  Black Tooth and White Fang . . . The Mouse . . . Words of Wisdom . . .Pachalafaka . . .  Blink Your Eyes, Pookie.

Soupy Sales was the James Joyce of children’s television. As legendary humorist S.J. Perelman once wrote (legendarily about himself):

Before they made him, they broke the mold.

Ditto for Soupy Sales.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

O’Really?

On Friday, Bold Fresh Piece of Humanity Bill O’Reilly returned to Boston University for Alumni Weekend and regaled a largely admiring audience with a variety of Fact(ors) from the O’Reilly Files.

The event was previewed by veteran Boston journalist Daniel Gewertz earlier this week:

The BU college hosting the event? The College of Communication (COM), home to the university’s Department of Journalism. In addition to a “conversation” between the face of FOX’s “The O’Reilly Factor” and another BU alum, Bill Wheatley (retired executive vice-president of NBC News), the evening will include a presentation of six “Distinguished Alumni Awards,” an honor already bestowed upon Mr. O’Reilly.

At that point, Gewertz got Geworked up:

See anything wrong with this picture? Not COM Dean Tom Fiedler, the man responsible for choosing O’Reilly as the night’s star attraction.

“I would argue that Bill O’Reilly is a role model for our students,” Fiedler told me recently. “I grant that his is a controversial path, and it may not be the path that all would choose.”

A role model?

“We are honoring Bill O’Reilly for living an honorable life,” Fiedler explained. “He has generously supported Boston University.”

“An honorable life.” It would take an article far longer than this one to catalog the deceptions, evasions and bullying tactics of O’Reilly.

Let me mention, but not stress, the millions of dollars that, according to theWashington Post, O’Reilly paid to his former producer, Andrea Mackris, to settle her sexual harassment case in 2004.

Another, more recent case:

On May 31, 2009, Dr. George Tiller, the Kansas abortion provider, was murdered at his local church. During the months leading up to this crime, O’Reilly often referred to the doctor as “Tiller the baby killer.” When criticized for his frequent use of the phrase, O’Reilly claimed he was directly quoting others. This was quickly disproved with voluminous videotape evidence.

None of that, of course, came up at Friday night’s O’Reilly love-in. Instead, here’s what we learned:

* O’Reilly has spent his career facing machine guns and Barney Frank with equal fearlessness

* As a result, he now needs bodyguards for his family and himself

* He couldn’t allow his Potemkin interview to be taped because there might be an untoward “incident” that could wind up on YouTube. (Not to get technical about it, but isn’t that what his “bodyguards” are supposed to prevent?)

* If afforded the chance, he wouldn’t recommend or even take again the career path he did because it was “too hard”

One thing Bill O’Reilly will never be called?

A Bold Fresh Piece of Humility.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

“Precious” Big?

The hardworking staff at Campaign Outsider hasn’t found the time yet to read “The Audacity of ‘Precious'” – the cover story in Sunday’s New York Times magazine. (Times tease: “Is America ready for a movie about an obese Harlem girl raped and impregnated by her abusive father?”)

Regardless of any actual knowledge of the piece, our oft-overlooked Campaign Outsider Prediction® desk is comfortable issuing the following statement:

“The cover piece in this Sunday’s Times magazine will produce a viper’s nest of identity politics and  PC witch-hunting.”

Forewarned is forearmed.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Death by a Thousand Paper Cuts

So it turns out (via the New York Times) that Texas executes too many people for the state’s daily newspapers to cover them all.

The state has put 441 inmates to death since 1982, more than the next six states combined. That includes 334 since the start of 1997, a period in which Texas accounted for 41 percent of the national total.

Hey, Texas: You’re Number One!

Given the routine nature of the state-sponsored executions – along with a knee-buckling freefall in advertising revenues – cash-strapped newspapers all across Texas have abandoned comprehensive coverage of capital punishment, relying instead on one Michael Graczyk, who has witnessed more than 300 deaths in the past 25 years.

From the Times report:

An Associated Press reporter based in Houston, Mr. Graczyk covers death penalty cases in Texas, the state that uses capital punishment far more than any other, and since the 1980s, he has attended nearly every execution the state has carried out — he has lost track of the precise count.

What we have here is one man watching Texas exercise the government’s ultimate power. The Lone Star State has turned into the Lone Stare State.

(Your groan goes here.)

Another groaner:

Newspapers sometimes use The A.P.’s reporting rather than their own — or they do not cover the executions at all. What was once a statewide story has become of strictly local interest.

Representative case study:

This year, the state has put to death five inmates in cases from Tarrant County, which includes Fort Worth. The [Fort Worth] Star-Telegram covered one, wrote about two other cases in the days before the executions, and on the remaining two did not publish any articles, either its own or The A.P.’s.

“It depends on whether the crime was particularly newsworthy,”  [executive editor Jim] Witt said.

Geez, and all this time I thought it was the execution that was newsworthy.

I must be wrong.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 5 Comments

Over Five Billion (Tweets) Served

Twitter – The Official Microblog of People With Nothing Else to Do – has (according to itself) surpassed 5,000,000,000 tweets, as the (U.K.) Telegraph reports. Headline:

Twitter’s five billionth tweet – the ‘pentagigatweet’ – sent

The pentagigatweet. Sweet.

Also sweet: this piece from Wired that predicts actual revenue for Twittter – The Official Microblog of Other People Making Money While Twitter Doesn’t.

The company’s revenue will be a modest $4 million or so this year. Even so, Twitter reportedly turned down a $500 million acquisition offer from Facebook last November and seems perfectly happy to burn through its roughly $150 million in investor funds.

Twitter – The Official Microblog of Other People’s Money, Period.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Dead Blogging the Boston Mayoral Debate

For all of you who stubbornly cling to the 21st century:

dead blog v. tr. To wait until an event is over before writing about it.

So, the Boston mayoral debate tonight between Mayor Tom Menino and City Councilor Michael Flaherty. Let’s start with the most important part of any televised debate:

Cosmetics.

The doublewide podiums didn’t do much for either candidate, the sound went all Barry White at the beginning, and the lighting was strictly Spooky World. But why get technical about it. It just goes to show what you can do when a consortium of four different media organizations sponsors one debate. (Your loss-of-consortium punchline goes here.)

The two anchors, WGBH‘s Emily Rooney and NECN‘s RD Sahl, and two reporters, the Boston Globe‘s Scott Helman and WBUR‘s Bob Oakes, had to divvy up the moderating/questioning chores, which had sort of a pinball effect on the proceedings. But that wasn’t the biggest problem tonight.

The biggest problem was that the debate featured more bromides than an old-fashioned drugstore and needed to be close-captioned for the govspeak-impaired.

So a debate that should have provided some answers for Boston voters mostly left them with questions.

For example, which of these makes for a better bumper sticker –  “Tom Menino: We haven’t been charged with anything” or “Under a Flaherty administration, we’ll have FiOS”?

Did most of the debate viewers/listeners have the foggiest idea what GIC, FOIA, and CORI stand for? If not (and that was a lot of them), they don’t know what Menino and Flaherty stand for.

Is it just me, or was Tom Menino more incoherent than usual tonight? It felt like he was totally channeling James Joyce.

Was the most uncomfortable moment of the night when Menino was pressed about the lack of diversity in his administration by an all-white panel of journalists?

You call this a choice? Flaherty: We need financial literacy courses for Boston residents. Menino: I got your financial literacy courses right here. Flaherty: We need SAT prep for Boston high schoolers. Menino: I got your SAT prep right here.

Really?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Shepard Fairey Is A Phony

This Sunday New York Times piece is one more nail in poster-boy Shepard Fairey’s artistic coffin. The lede says it all:

Shepard Fairey, the artist whose “Hope” poster of Barack Obama became an iconic emblem of the presidential campaign, has admitted that he lied about which photograph from The Associated Press he used as his source, and that he then covered up evidence to substantiate his lie.

The back story, via the Times:

The A.P. claimed in January that Mr. Fairey owed it credit and compensation for using the photograph. But in February Mr. Fairey sued The A.P., seeking a declaratory judgment that the poster did not infringe on the agency’s copyrights and that he was entitled to the image under the “fair use” exception of the copyright law. The A.P.countersued in March, saying Mr. Fairey had misappropriated the photograph.

Beyond Fairey’s pathetic document-altering is the really phony part:

Last year Fairey sued a Texas graphic designer for doing to Fairey’s Andre the Giant “Obey Giant” posters what Fairey did to the AP’s Obama photograph. As the Austin Chronicle reported:

It all comes down to one of the great contemporary visual icons, called Obey Giant. The strange, stylized, brooding image of a face has become a global brand, a 20-year art phenomenon that melds street art, propaganda, and viral marketing. Created by graphic artist Shepard Fairey, the ubiquitous image has been an inspiration for a generation of graffiti, collage, and mash-up artists. One of those influenced was Austin graphic designer Baxter Orr, who did his own take on Fairey’s work: a piece called Protect, with the iconic Obey Giant face covered by a SARS (respiratory) mask. He started selling prints, marked as his own work, through his website.

Fairey, who claims his Obama Hope poster is “transformative” – and thus exempt from copyright restrictions –  seems to believe Baxter Orr’s transformation of Obey Giant isnt.

Fairey says Orr is [a] profiteer – not an artist but a mimic and “parasite” speculating in the secondary art market, by which dealers snap up a limited-edition print run of a work to resell at an artificially inflated price. It’s not illegal, but it is widely viewed in the art community as unethical. Fairey says Orr, in addition to copying his work, has been guilty of its mercenary exploitation as well. “I want people who are fans of the work to get them,” said Fairey, who sells his prints for $25-35 but has found them sold online for hundreds of dollars more. To crimp speculation, Fairey introduced a one print per customer limit. But Orr, he says, has used proxies to buy extra prints, to corner and gouge the market – an allegation Orr rejects.

Fairey can slice it thin as prosciutto, but the truth of the matter is:

Shepard Fairey is a phony.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments