NYT Columnist A Total Weanie

From Campaign Outsider’s Bad Sentence o’ the Day ® Desk:

New York Times op-ed contributor Charles Blow had a column in Saturday’s edition that addresses the movement of young adults in the U.S. “away from organized religion while trying desperately to connect with their spirituality.”

The bad sentence at issue:

So, anyone laboring under the delusion that the generation weaned on MTV would move us closer to being weaned of an abnormally high level of religiosity — at least when compared with other industrialized countries — may have to keep waiting.

That’s two shots at getting the usage of “wean” right, and neither one a direct hit.

Is it “weaned on?”

Or “weaned of?”

Actually, neither. It’s “weaned off (or from),” as in – according to the American Heritage Dictionary – “to detach from that to which one is strongly habituated or devoted.” (Think “to take nourishment other than by suckling.”)

Suckling that, all you loosey-goosey usagey folks.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

You Call That Art?

Excellent A-Hed (definition here) in Friday’s Wall Street Journal.

Head/subheadlines:

After the Bubble, Beauty Is But Fleeting for Greenspan Portraits

Some Owners Who Paid Top Dollar Stash Paintings of Ex-Fed Chief in Closet, Under Bed

Lede:

In the offices of the Hennessee Group hang two oil paintings and two prints, each portraying the bespectacled visage of former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan.

“What I should do is make them into a dart board,” says Charles Gradante, who with his wife, Lee Hennessee, runs the Fifth Avenue firm that advises investors in hedge funds. “All I see when I look at these paintings are two market crashes, a bear market, and the current economic crisis.”

Graphic (“Irrational Exuberance” by Erin Crowe):

[SB10001424052748703983004575073882742244288]

Yikes!

More:

A gallery in the Hamptons that exhibited [Ms. Crowe’s] paintings in the summer of 2005 sold every one within a couple of days, recalls Sally Breen, who organized the show with Rebecca Cooper. She had a second Greenspan show in downtown Manhattan. Ms. Crowe says she produced upwards of 50 canvasses of Mr. Greenspan. All were snapped up, some for as much as $5,000 to $10,000, she says.

As her popularity grew, Ms. Crowe flew business class to Hong Kong, where she painted portraits of leading financial figures, including Hong Kong’s chief executive and the head of its Monetary Authority. She realized that she’d found her niche: painting financial gurus. The future looked dazzling.

She painted one of the portraits on live television when Mr. Greenspan retired. It fetched $150,400 for charity in an online auction.

Double yikes!!

Then again, the Greenspaniard who shelled out that 150 large found his exuberance to be, well, irrational.

Now, the man who bought that painting, Tampa Bay-area businessman Matthew Schirmer, says he keeps it under his bed.

Mr. Schirmer says he had high hopes for the painting when he bought it in 2006 with his brother, Nathan. The money they spent went to a worthy cause, autism research. But Mr. Schirmer says he was hoping to raise even more money for a favorite charity, Autism Speaks.

“We thought, let us ride this wave,” he recalls. Mr. Schirmer paid to have 100 high-quality prints made of the painting. He flew Ms. Crowe to Florida to sign them. Her painting was placed on an easel in the lobby of a Tampa-area bank Mr. Schirmer helped found. Mr. Schirmer anticipated holding charity fund-raisers with the Greenspan painting as a draw.

“There was no interest,” he says. To this day, he hasn’t sold any prints, he says, “not a single one.” The original painting could still recover some value, he says. “I hate to tell you, but we are kind of waiting for him to pass on.”

Triple yikes!!!

Alan Greenspan. Wanted: Dead not Alive.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Palin By Comparison

Is it good or bad for Sarah Palin (R-No Hopey, No Changey) that she’s being attacked from the left and from the right?

Lefty Leon Wieseltier of The New Republic has the No Hopey beat covered.

Righty Dorothy Rabinowitz of the Wall Street Journal handles the No Changey part.

Questions? Comments? Bitter recriminations?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

NYT War Coverage Under Fire

I don’t care what Matthew Rothschild of The Progressive says about New York Times reporter C.J. Chivers’ Afghanistan war coverage (via faithful commenter CAvard).

Rothschild’s lede:

I’m disgusted with the New York Times coverage of the U.S. assault on Marja.

The paper, featuring the work of embedded reporter C. J. Chivers, wrote about it like it was the biggest battle—and most dangerous one—since the landing at Normandy.

Rebuttal: This Thursday Times Page One report.

Snipers Imperil U.S.-Led Forces in Afghan Offensive

Tyler Hicks/The New York Times

By C. J. CHIVERS

MARJA, Afghanistan — In five days of fighting, the Taliban have shown a side not often seen in nearly a decade of American military action in Afghanistan: the use of snipers, both working alone and integrated into guerrilla-style ambushes.

Five Marines and two Afghan soldiers have been struck here in recent days by bullets fired at long range. That includes one Marine fatally shot and two others wounded in the opening hour of a four-hour clash on Wednesday, when a platoon with Company K of the Third Battalion, Sixth Marines, was ambushed while moving on foot across a barren expanse of flat ground between the clusters of low-slung mud buildings.

Chivers (and redoubtable Times photog Tyler Hicks) are putting themselves in harm’s way to report on these battles.

Critics should weigh that against their ideological biases before dumping on Chivers – or any other war correspondent.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Gail Collins Should Be More Kay-ful

For my money (of which there’s not very much), New York Times columnist Gail Collins is routinely a better read than the paper’s Op-It Girl Maureen Dowd. But today’s piece seemed to slip the rails in a reference to the Texas GOP gubernatorial primary.

Collins writes: “The 10th Amendment to the Constitution, which gives the states all powers not delegated to the federal government, is all the rage.” Especially at the Conservative Political Action Conference, which begins today in Washington but is less than a star-studded event.

Some of the tenthers’ favorite stars [are] too busy to show up. Sarah Palin — whose husband once flirted with the Alaska secessionists — declined. Gov. Rick Perry of Texas — who cuddled up to the Texas secession movement in 2008 — is home running for re-election and wowing the crowd at a Tenth Amendment Town Hall. His strongest challenger for the Republican nomination appears to be a woman who told Glenn Beck that she had an open mind about whether there was any American government involvement in the 9/11 attack.

That would be Debra Medina, who implied to Glenn Beck on his radio show that Dick Cheney was the 21st hijacker on 9/11.

Medina’s not exactly moonwalking away from those comments, either.

Back to Collins, though: the latest poll (via KDFA in Amarillo) in the Texas shootout has incumbent Gov. Rick Perry (R-Anyone Wanna Secede?) at 45%, Medina at 17%, and – wait for her – Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R- Double Dip) at 29%. Collins apparently forgot her. Then again, a lot of voters have too.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Girls Gone Designer

A local PR agency is pushing the website Fashion Playtes:

[T]he first virtual design studio that empowers girls ages 6-12 to design and produce their very own clothing. The online platform let’s [sic] girls “play designer” and use their creativity to create custom clothes and accessories (complete with personalized labels featuring the name of their line) that are delivered within 3 weeks.

That’s just what we need: More evidence for the children of America that the world is their oyster with an R in every month (thank you, Philip Barry).

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

NYT Paterson Shoe Finally Drops

So after all the hoopla –

• From a New York Observer reporter’s tweet a week and a half ago (“anyone hearing about NYT bombshell on Paterson? Heard big, damanging [sic] story comin [sic]. been working for weeks, but still not published yet.”)

• To all kinds of sexual speculation (“I Did Not Have Sex With That Woman,” the New York Post front-paged)

• To this past Sunday’s New York Times Public Editor column headlined “Somebody Else’s Rumor” (translation: Mind your own business)

– the Times has finally published its big exposé on Gov. David Paterson (D-Who, Me?).

And here’s what the Times has served up:

Paterson Aide’s Quick Rise Draws Scrutiny

Yeah – scrutiny from the Times:

David W. Johnson has worked for Gov. David A. Paterson for much of his adult life. He began as a young, ambitious intern from Harlem when Mr. Paterson was a state legislator. He rose to be Mr. Paterson’s driver, serving as a kind of protector and scheduler.

In recent months, however, Mr. Johnson’s ascent has been striking: he is now one of the most senior people in the governor’s administration, paid $132,000. He is described as Mr. Paterson’s closest confidant, a man with a designated room for his overnight stays in the Executive Mansion, and a broadening role in areas like campaign strategy, government initiatives and the management of the governor’s staff.

Inconveniently, the Times reports, Mr. Johnson has also “twice been arrested on felony drug charges,” and  “on three occasions been involved in altercations with women.”

Also inconveniently, the Times says, “[Gov.] Paterson has made domestic violence a key issue in his career.”

Finally inconveniently, the Times story is a tissue of innuendo – a woman involved in one altercation “insisted on anonymity” and “declined to offer evidence” of a domestic violence complaint – and, well, innuendo:

Mr. Johnson’s increasing prominence, and Mr. Paterson’s reliance on him, have worried some veteran aides to the governor, who themselves are trying to assist Mr. Paterson as he faces an enormous fiscal crisis and a daunting election effort. They would not speak by name, but more than four current or former officials expressed concern that Mr. Johnson and another aide, a former state trooper, had become the governor’s innermost circle and were simply not best equipped to help him tackle the multiple challenges facing him.

Sounds like a run-of-the-mill political turf war. Here’s the other side, according to the Times piece:

Bill Lynch, one of the governor’s longtime political strategists, said that he talked campaign strategy with Mr. Johnson and that it had been Mr. Johnson’s idea to hold a series of community conversations in New York City late last year.

Asked what made Mr. Johnson qualified to be involved in campaign strategy, Mr. Lynch said: “I don’t know much about his history other than his working for the governor. But as far as I’m concerned, his instincts on these campaign things are good, if not damn near perfect.”

Assemblyman Keith L. T. Wright, a Harlem Democrat, said of Mr. Johnson: “I look at him as a gatekeeper. I actually think he’s done pretty well.

“He’s been with David for years. He is a good filter for David. David trusts him. And his influence has grown.”

Clearly.

David W. Johnson has made Page One of the New York Times.

Now can we have the sex scandal?


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

‘Vice’ Precedent

Here at the Global Worldwide Headquarters of Campaign Outsider, we tend to be as open-minded as the next guy – assuming, of course, the next guy isn’t Jerry Springer.

But when the hardworking staff read David Carr’s column in Monday’s New York Times, we experienced one of those Wait-A-Second moments.

Carr’s lede:

Visit CNN.com these days and you might come across a video about Liberia in which a regular-looking guy, about as far from a dashing foreign correspondent as you can get, is walking through a swamp and interviewing a Liberian warlord named General Butt Naked. (He’s called that because he leads his fighters wearing nothing more than a bad attitude.)

“Most of our boys, they would drain the blood from an innocent child and then drink it before going into battle,” the general says. “So you kill the child and then drink the blood?” the reporter, Shane Smith asks. “Yes,” says the general. Following a link in the video will lead to a tour of a fetid red-light district and a shot of a young soldier holding a human heart aloft before eating it.

Very Stephen Glass (refresher course here).

But David Carr is no Stephen Glass, right? So the hardworking staff hauled itself over to CNN.com and plugged “General Butt Naked” into the search engine and this is what we found:

Back to David Carr:

But even more surprising than this dark, scary content is finding it on a mainstream media site. The Liberia pieces are supplied through a partnership with VBS.tv, the video arm of Vice, the Brooklyn magazine better known for pictures of young topless women and articles on drug use (the February issue combines those interests in a photo spread called “THC and A”).

We have seen the future of news and it’s VBS?

Yikes!

And . . . okay.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

C.J. Chivers (As in, Shivers)

First, a quibble.

Here’s the lede from C.J. Chivers’ page one piece in Sunday’s New York Times about a Marine battalion getting its first taste of war:

MARJA, Afghanistan — The helicopters landed before dawn Saturday in a poppy field beside a row of mud-walled compounds. The Marines ran into the darkness and crouched through the rotor-whipped dust as their aircraft lifted away.

And here’s the lede of the Sunday Boston Globe’s pickup from the New York Times wire service:

MARJA, Afghanistan – The helicopters landed before dawn yesterday, alighting in a poppy field beside a row of mud-walled compounds. The Marines ran into the darkness and crouched through the rotor-whipped dust as their aircraft lifted away. [emphasis added]

(Memo to Globe night desk editors: Stop clunkifying perfectly good ledes and start paying attention to the serious errors in the paper (see here).

(Seriously.)

Back to the Chivers piece:

Even on short deadline (Saturday action/Sunday report), Chivers packs a punch. Examples:

At 12:40, fighting broke out for Third Platoon. For almost three hours, Second and Third Platoons took sporadic fire from [Taliban] insurgents in several directions. At times the fighting was intense, and the gunfire rose and roared and snapped overhead.

The Taliban let the Marines walk into an open field and approach a tall stand of dried grass. Then they opened fire in a hasty ambush. The Marines dropped. They fired back, exposed. Gunfire rose to a crescendo.

At night, Captain Biggers reflected on the day. An explosives ordnance disposal team with the company had found and destroyed four large bombs hidden in the roads. The platoons had seized their first objectives. In its first day of combat, Company K had been fighting for hours without a casualty, and several Taliban fighters were lying dead in one of the fields.

That’s how the piece ends.

How the war in Afghanistan ends is anybody’s guess.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

The 1.01% Solution

From our Defining APR Down desk:

Citibank (official slogan: Thanks, suckers!)  is currently running a newspaper ad with the headline, “DREAM 1.01% BIGGER.”

The ad promotes the Citibank® Savings Plus Account, which offers a whopping 1.01% APY (Annual Percentage Yield – the new APR) if you dump $25,000 into it.

(Full disclosure: The hardworking staff’s checking account – not at Citibank, but might as well be – earned exactly $.02 last month. Go figure.)

So forget what Albert Einstein supposedly (according to snopes.com) said about compound interest being “the most powerful force in the universe.”

You don’t have to be a Mensa member to know how powerless compound interest is these days.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment