ESPN Needs To Think Outside The Box

As Made Yankee Fan in Boston kept an eye on the New York-Tampa Bay tilt last night on ESPN, we found ourselves increasingly annoyed with its K Zone feature, which we’ve apparently managed to avoid for the past ten years.

From ESPN Front Row:

Happy 10th birthday, K Zone

Ten years ago Friday, ESPN took major steps to enhance the Major League Baseball viewing experience by debuting the “K Zone” on Sunday Night Baseball.

The 2002 Sports Emmy award-winning “K Zone” is a computer-generated, on-screen graphic.

It’s calibrated specifically for each batter, calculating the speed and showing the location in which the ball crosses the hitter’s strike zone.

In 2006, ESPN unveiled “K Zone 2.0,” which added the ability to track the path of a ball from the pitcher’s hand to home plate and the ability to show a complete sequence of pitches to a batter shown in numerical order.

In 2011, ESPN began utilizing this technology during live game telecasts with “K Zone Live.”

K Zone Dead would be an even better innovation.

As the New York Post’s Phil Mushnick wrote last spring (via TVNewser):

“The K box serves the dual purpose of being annoying and misleading. It asks us to consider balls and strikes as seen in one, faulty dimension. This isn’t stickball, you geniuses! Yet, ESPN’s has painted a strike box to a virtual handball wall to help us grasp big league baseball!

Stop wrecking these telecasts! Please! If fans wanted to watch pitches thrown toward a box in front of the catcher, teams would dangle one from a hook behind home plate. Let us watch the games. That’s all we’ve ever asked.”

Amen.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Pro-Bachmann PAC Manhandles Rick Perry’s Wife

As the incredible shrinking Michele Bachmann (R-Can You see Me Now?) watches her presidential primary campaign go down like the Hindenburg, her friends – such as the Keep Conservatives United PAC – are trying to come to her rescue.

Their latest effort, currently on Iowa TV airwaves:

 

But conservative blogeteria Pajamas Media has hit back with this:

Bachmann Super-PAC Runs False Ad Attacking Rick Perry’s Wife

Michele Bachmann looks increasingly desperate — sinking in the polls, money drying up, and now flailing away at the wife of one of her opponents. Check out the ad just released by a Bachmann super-PAC ironically called “Keep Conservatives United.”

The post continues: “Several years and an entirely different field (osteoporosis) separate Mrs. Perry’s consulting work from the Gardasil controversy, and Rick Perry wasn’t even governor yet.”

The hardworking staff is not sure what the truth is here; then again the hardworking staff is not sure that the truth matters here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Let The $4 Billion Rumpus Begin! (Viral Video Edition)

Up to now, the hardworking staff has limited The Rumpus to paid advertising in print or on television (still waiting on our first radio spot). But as this piece from techPresident notes, online video advertising is a growth industry in political campaigns, largely due to declining TV viewership:

According to a bipartisan study released this week, 31 percent of all likely voters don’t watch live TV; rather, they watch programs on DVR during which they may skip through commercial breaks, or they watch online or in mobile environments.

The study found the exodus from television especially high among likely voters aged 18-44,  just 44% of whom say TV is their primary mode of video consumption. So candidates fish where the fishes are and pepper YouTube with videos they hope go viral.

Given the growing number of them, and given that they cost money to produce, even if they often run for free, The Rumpus will be examining some of the more unusual online videos as Campaign 2012 progresses.

Which brings us to this cinematic extravaganza from Rick Perry (via Politico). The 1:45 video careers from Walker Evans-style images of empty streets, abandoned factories and boarded-up houses to breakneck visuals of economic conditions (zero jobs, zero growth, zero hope) to GauzeCam shots of Perry and a serious Beloved Leader montage of clips and graphics.

1,101 views at post time. We’ll check back over the next few days to see if this one catches on.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Weak ADtack: Do Online Marketers Really Know Us That Well?

Advertising Age’s Matthew Creamer decided to check out how well online marketers know him, given all the hoopla about Internet  privacy, data mining, and etc. So he decided to keep track of the ads tracking him on the web.

He didn’t exactly find what he expected:

Read the press around this multibillion-dollar industry and you’re led to believe that every marketer knows enough about your demographic profile and your behavior to anticipate your desire and serve up a marketing communication so hyper-relevant it transcends its status as an ad and becomes something like information. And how you feel about that probably depends on how you view privacy. Is personal information sacrosanct or is it something that can be given up in dribs and drabs to fund all the free activity going on online and to get pitches from brands less likely to waste your time and attention?

It may indeed be the case that we’re slouching toward some “Minority Report”-like reality, but after 48 hours spent looking hard at online ads, stopping to track every impression I made for an advertiser and understand what relation, if any, it might bear to my personal information, I felt anything but paranoid. Quite the contrary — the experience was underwhelming.

The ads, Creamer writes, felt irrelevant, untargeted, and largely indistinguishable:  ”The general sense of the experience was a less bittersweet version of a common post-high-school realization: ‘They really didn’t know me, did they?’”

Maybe they didn’t, but it’s not for lack of trying. Creamer concludes, “Not only did internet advertising not feel scary, it didn’t feel particularly effective, either.”

Okay, but I’m not so sure I want rely on the they’re not sharp enough to violate my privacy defense.

Originally posted on Sneak ADtack

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Scion Of The Times Makes Front-Page News

The New York Times roll-your-own tradition has continued with the recent coming-out party of A.G. Sulzberger, the latest entrant in the family business.

From the start his sinecure propelled the Nepotism Patrol into DEFCON 4 – but not so fast wrote then-Slate media critic Jack Schafer last year:

You won’t catch me snarking about the promotion of A.G. Sulzberger from a reporter slot on the New York Times‘ metro staff, where he’s been laboring for a year, to chief of the paper’s reopening Kansas City bureau.

Yes, it’s obvious that A.G.’s upgrade has more to do with who his father is—New York Times Co. Chairman of the Board Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr.—than with his journalistic skills. So when Columbia Journalism Review‘s Ryan Chittum tweeted “publisher’s kid becomes a buro chief? after a year?” this afternoon, I appreciated his nepotism complaint. It’s just not right that a 29-year-old reporter with one year of experience with the Times, a couple of years at the Oregonian, and couple more at the Providence Journal should be running a Times bureau unless he has greatness written all over him. Which he doesn’t, if this dump of his Times pieces is any gauge.

But meritocracy doesn’t always deliver the goods. A fine case can be made for rapid promotion of a family member in a family-controlled company if 1) the company’s values are laudable and 2) the company has historically tapped its values directly from the family, which has been true of the New York Times Co. since paterfamilias Adolph S. Ochs purchased the Times in 1896.

Not to mention Sulzberger the Younger has produced some reasonably good work recently.

Exhibit A: His front-page piece in Tuesday’s Times headlined “In Small Towns, Gossip Moves to the Web, and Turns Vicious.”

Coincidentally, Schafer concluded his Slate piece last year with this admonition:

[D]on’t pass judgment on A.G. Sulzberger until you read the Boston Phoenix‘s 2006 profile of him.

Good call, Jack.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Let The $4 Billion Rumpus Begin! (Warren Buffet Edition)

MoveOn.org is moving in Barack Obama’s direction.

The ultraliberal advocacy group, which has spent much of Obama’s presidency sniping at him, just launched an ad campaign “praising the president’s proposal to impose higher taxes on the wealthy,” according to ABC News’s The Note.

That would be the “Buffet Rule,” named after billionaire investor Warren Buffet, whose recent New York Times op-ed called for tax hikes on the super-rich, since he purportedly pays a lower percentage on his taxable income than his secretary does on hers.

Thus, MoveOn’s 30-second TV spot titled “Buffet’s Secretary.” (Warning: No actual secretary of Warren Buffet was used in this commercial.)

 

The hardworking staff is very much looking forward to a MoveOn ad sequel titled “Buffet’s Accountant.” That will likely be a 60-second spot.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why Is ABC Letting Claire Shipman Shill For Agribusiness?

This Thursday, an outfit called U.S. Farmers & Ranchers Alliance is hosting The Food Dialogues, “a town hall-style discussion to address Americans’ questions about how their food is grown and raised and the long-term impact of the food they are eating – on their own health and the health of the planet.”

Moderator: Claire Shipman, senior national correspondent at ABC’s “Good Morning America.”

This is an agribusiness front group with a grubstake of $11 million dedicated to solidifying its monopoly position in the food chain.

It’s obvious why agribusiness is funding this effort. But why is ABC allowing Shipman to front it?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 6 Comments

Netflix Is Really Sorry It Tried – Er, Decided – To Gouge You

Netflix, which had very successfully been delivering video content via both the U.S. Postal Service and Internet portals for $9.99 a month, suddenly decided this month to split those services and jack up its subscription cost by 60%.

Netflixers, understandably, were not happy. So CEO Reed Hastings sent this email to subscribers:

Dear [So-and-So],

I messed up. I owe you an explanation.

It is clear from the feedback over the past two months that many members felt we lacked respect and humility in the way we announced the separation of DVD and streaming and the price changes. That was certainly not our intent, and I offer my sincere apology. Let me explain what we are doing.

For the past five years, my greatest fear at Netflix has been that we wouldn’t make the leap from success in DVDs to success in streaming. Most companies that are great at something – like AOL dialup or Borders bookstores – do not become great at new things people want (streaming for us). So we moved quickly into streaming, but I should have personally given you a full explanation of why we are splitting the services and thereby increasing prices. It wouldn’t have changed the price increase, but it would have been the right thing to do.

So here is what we are doing and why.

Many members love our DVD service, as I do, because nearly every movie ever made is published on DVD. DVD is a great option for those who want the huge and comprehensive selection of movies.

I also love our streaming service because it is integrated into my TV, and I can watch anytime I want. The benefits of our streaming service are really quite different from the benefits of DVD by mail. We need to focus on rapid improvement as streaming technology and the market evolves, without maintaining compatibility with our DVD by mail service.

So we realized that streaming and DVD by mail are really becoming two different businesses, with very different cost structures, that need to be marketed differently, and we need to let each grow and operate independently.

It’s hard to write this after over 10 years of mailing DVDs with
pride, but we think it is necessary: In a few weeks, we will rename our DVD by mail service to “Qwikster”. We chose the name Qwikster because it refers to quick delivery. We will keep the name “Netflix” for streaming.

Qwikster will be the same website and DVD service that everyone is used to. It is just a new name, and DVD members will go to qwikster.com to access their DVD queues and choose movies. One improvement we will make at launch is to add a video games upgrade option, similar to our upgrade option for Blu-ray, for those who want to rent Wii, PS3 and Xbox 360 games. Members have been asking for video games for many years, but now that DVD by mail has its own team, we are finally getting it done. Other improvements will follow. A
negative of the renaming and separation is that the Qwikster.com and Netflix.com websites will not be integrated.

There are no pricing changes (we’re done with that!). If you subscribe to both services you will have two entries on your credit card statement, one for Qwikster and one for Netflix. The total will be the same as your current charges. We will let you know in a few weeks when the Qwikster.com website is up and ready.

For me the Netflix red envelope has always been a source of joy. The new envelope is still that lovely red, but now it will have a Qwikster logo. I know that logo will grow on me over time, but still, it is hard. I imagine it will be similar for many of you.

I want to acknowledge and thank you for sticking with us, and to apologize again to those members, both current and former, who felt we treated them thoughtlessly.

Both the Qwikster and Netflix teams will work hard to regain your trust. We know it will not be overnight. Actions speak louder than words. But words help people to understand actions.

Respectfully yours,

-Reed Hastings, Co-Founder and CEO, Netflix

p.s. I have a slightly longer explanation along with a video posted on our blog, where you can also post comments.

Which will, no doubt, be many. (21,827 at current count.)

So, to summarize: Blah blah blah sorry blah blah blah you won’t will pay more blah blah blah and new subscribers almost certainly will too.

Chalk up one more casualty of the Great Media Shift Almost No One Can Figure Out.

Pat. pending.

UPDATE: For some reason, the hardworking staff initially thought that “there are no pricing changes” meant the old rate would apply to existing subscribers, but apparently we were wrong. So Netflix is an even bigger idiot than we thought.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 5 Comments

Splitting The Warren Vote In Haverhill

From the Setti Warren campaign for U.S. Senate:

Mayor Setti Warren Wins the Haverhill Straw Poll

Haverhill, MA – Over the weekend, Mayor Warren won the annual Haverhill Democratic City Committee straw poll; the complete results from the straw poll are below:

Setti Warren: 34

Elizabeth Warren: 13

Marisa Defranco: 11

Tom Conroy: 9

Bob Massie: 5

Alan Khazei: 1

Herb Robinson: 0

This comes hard on the heels of Setti W’s dispatching of Elizabeth W in Methuen’s straw poll.

Do we see a pattern emerging here? Or is it too early for that kind of thing?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

WSJ’s Jason Gay To Littlest Red Sox Fans: Welcome To Boston

The Wall Street Journal has been on the Red Sox like David Ortiz on a low fastball. Today’s installment comes from columnist Jason Gay:

Boston Kids Finally Feel Heartbreak

This letter is for everyone in Boston who’s 10 years old or younger:

Okay, kids, sit down. Pour yourself a nice glass of milk. Eat a delicious Green Monster cookie. Eat two!

Your carefree childhood is on the verge of being rocked.

You may not realize it, but you’ve been spoiled rotten. It’s not your fault. But you’ve been historically lucky, and the cosmic bill is way past overdue.

If you are a 10-year-old Boston sports fan, you have seen remarkable, glorious things. You have seen two Red Sox World Series titles, three Patriots Super Bowl trophies, a Celtics NBA title, and a Bruins Stanley Cup.

But that’s not Boston.

What Boston is, explains Gay, is longing, anguish, and heartache:

Mom shuts off the TV in the middle of an inning. Dad’s smoking Winstons on the porch. When the Sox make a pitching change, Grandpa kicks the coffee table and announces he has to “walk the dog.”

Grandpa doesn’t have a dog.

Regardless, the way things are going, he’s gonna need a bigger one.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments