The Weekly Standard Pimps Out Its Cover and Writers – Again!

This is getting to be a habit, no?

As the hardworking staff has repeatedly noted, The Weekly Standard has lately become a marketing chippy for its owner Philip Anschutz, who also owns Xanterra Parks & Resorts.

As we wrote earlier:

The Weekly Standard has taken to pimping out its editorial content and its writers to Xanterra Parks & Resorts, the major concessionaire at U.S. National Parks.

At that point, we sent an email to Weekly Standard editor William Kristol, who has of course not deigned to respond to us.

So this time we’re emailing Geoffrey Norman, whose work we greatly admire but who has been knee-deep in this aditorial series, having written about Death Valley, Zion National Park, and, in this latest edition, the Grand Canyon.


Screen Shot 2016-04-29 at 12.48.03 PM

Screen Shot 2016-04-29 at 12.48.16 PM


The money (at least for Philip Anschutz) quote, which turns up in one form or another in all of the Xanterra branded content pieces:

It’s impossible to describe the majesty of it. The mix of colors on the opposite side, the great depth that the Colorado River has carved through the stone walls, down into the earth’s vitals, the play of light and shadow. The sheer, undeniable immensity.

Just no way. You must see it for yourself, as Teddy Roosevelt said every American must.

Right in the middle of the four-page spread “Celebrating 100 Years of the National Parks Service Sponsored by Xanterra and Produced by The Weekly Standard” comes this ad-within-the-ad:


Screen Shot 2016-04-29 at 12.48.40 PM


Don’t get us wrong: This is a terrific piece that nicely captures the grandeur of the Grand Canyon.

But in the end it’s marketing material, not editorial content.

So we sent this email to Geoffrey Norman:

Dear Mr. Norman,

[We] greatly admire your work and have learned a tremendous amount from your Weekly Standard pieces about both the Civil War and World War I.

But your recent pieces for the magazine’s celebration of the National Parks Service (which are excellent in their own right) make [us] wonder: Are you comfortable producing what is essentially marketing material masquerading as editorial content?

[We] don’t mean to be disrespectful. [We’re] just concerned about the inexorable blurring of the line between advertising and editorial content. (See here for further details.)


[The hardworking staff]

We’ll let you know if he gets back to us.

Meanwhile, in the same edition, The Weekly Standard also leased out its front cover, just as it did two months ago. This time the buyer was the execrable corporate gunsel Rick Berman, whose Employee Rights Act front group has been for months exploiting the legacy of Jackie Robinson in its campaign to suppress increases in the minimum wage.

Here’s the cover the front group purchased:


Screen Shot 2016-04-29 at 12.46.48 PM


The stealth marketing effort was a four-page wraparound but we’ll omit the other three, lest we do Berman’s dirty work for him. Regardless, our beef isn’t really with Berman who, like the scorpion, does what he does. Our beef is with The Weekly Standard, of which we are a charter subscriber and from which we expect better.

Or at least used to.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s