Dropping Chevy Is Deuced Foolish

So, the New York Times reports, the geniuses at GM have decided that a Chevrolet is no longer a Chevy:

On Tuesday, G.M. sent a memo to Chevrolet employees at its Detroit headquarters, promoting the importance of “consistency” for the brand, which was the nation’s best-selling line of cars and trucks for more than half a century after World War II.

And one way to present a consistent brand message, the memo suggested, is to stop saying “Chevy,” though the word is one of the world’s best-known, longest-lived product nicknames.

And that “consistent brand message” would be: GM stands for Gone Mental.

Exhibit B: “A postscript to the memo says a sort of cuss jar – a plastic ‘Chevy’ can – has been placed in the hallway. ‘Every time someone uses “Chevy” rather than Chevrolet,’ the note said, the employee is expected to put a quarter in the can.

Trying to inject some reality into the picture, the Times piece notes brand nicknames that have stuck – and worked –  such as Coke, FedEx, and KFC. The best analogy, though, is what happened at ESPN 2. When the emergency backup sports network first hit cable, ESPN anchors started calling it The Deuce, which the Brainiacs in Bristol said reduced brand awareness, so they had a “cuss jar” too.

Of course, The Deuce became its own brand, which the Einsteins at ESPN belatedly realized.

This Just In: GM has – not surprisingly – shifted into reverse, according to the Wheels blog at the Times:

No more Chevy? News of the phase-out spread quickly, and the hundreds of comments to Wheels revealed an emotional connection to the Chevy name. The overwhelming response prompted G.M. to issue a formal news statement on the change, one in which the company uses the word Chevy. Twice.

Here is the statement in full:

Today’s emotional debate over a poorly worded memo on our use of the Chevrolet brand is a good reminder of how passionately people feel about Chevrolet. It is a passion we share and one we do not take for granted.

We love Chevy. In no way are we discouraging customers or fans from using the name. We deeply appreciate the emotional connections that millions of people have for Chevrolet and its products.

In global markets, we are establishing a significant presence for Chevrolet and need to move toward a consistent brand name for advertising and marketing purposes. The memo in question was one step in that process.

We hope people around the world will continue to fall in love with Chevrolets and smile when they call their favorite car, truck or crossover “Chevy.”

Here endeth the lesson.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Dropping Chevy Is Deuced Foolish

  1. Curmdgeon says:

    Hey, the company is bankrupt. They can’t afford to support two names for a vehicle line.

    The government owns most of what’s left of the company. Do you really think that they could enforce a reasonable solution?

    Now, now, John. You gotta look at this in perspective, their hands and brains are tied.

  2. af says:

    Instead of “Chevy”, why don’t we use the name “New Chevrolet”, since it worked so well with Coke and New Coke? Changing the name from the decades old common nickname to the more formal “christened name”, won’t improve the status of the thing. They’d be better off putting their efforts into improving utility and quality, instead of …. I don’t know what to call this effort.

    • Campaign Outsider says:

      Some call it a clever marketing ploy, just like giving that ‘Vette to the Tigers pitcher who got jobbed out of a perfect game.

      • af says:

        I can see giving a Vette to the pitcher who got jobbed out of a perfect game. After all, it generates good will. What good promo comes of the Chevy/Chevrolet deal, buzz? That may work in the belief that anything that gets them to talk about Chevy is a good thing, but they can only be ridiculed for this. BTW, along the line of Chevy/Chevrolet thinking, how long will “Vette” be acceptable before “Corvette” becomes the law of the company?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s