Bay State Banter

News that the city of Boston has offered a financial bailout to the shuttered Bay State Banner produced reactions that ranged from sunny proclamations by the mayor to shell-shocked acquiescence by the Banner’s publisher to eggshell analysis from local chinstrokers.

The story, first reported by the Boston Globe, has Mayor Tom Menino stating that the $200,000 loan is not an attempt to garner favor from the Banner (which has been critical of Menino in the past).

‘‘This is about me helping a business that is very important to the minority community,’’ Menino said. ‘‘I will step up anytime and help any business in this city. I’m trying to help a business survive. Tell me if that’s wrong.’’

Okay.

That’s wrong.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: If you’re in the news business, you do not want to invite any government types into your house. Before you can say “camel’s nose under the tent,” they’ll be kicking their shoes off and making a baloney sandwich.

Unfortunately, local chinstroker reaction to the Globe story was, well, restrained. Sam Tyler of the business-backed Boston Municipal Research Bureau said:

“I think the Banner plays an important role in Boston and the Boston community, but I don’t think it’s an appropriate use of public funds.”

Lou Ureneck, chairman of the journalism department at Boston University (where I am a mass communication professor), told the Globe:

“Clearly, the Banner is a community asset, and it’s in the interest of all residents of Boston for the paper to keep operating . . . But it is highly unusual for a government entity to loan money to a newspaper.”

Actually, it’s more than highly unusual – it’s highly suicidal. But that doesn’t seem to faze Banner publisher Mel Miller – who, to be fair, has single-handedly kept the Banner afloat for almost 45 years. Unless my ears betray me, though, he told WBUR that he sees no conflict in taking money from the city his paper is supposed to watchdog.

It’s all too reminiscent of the classic story about the Baltimore alderman who owned a local bar and also sat on the city’s Alcoholic Beverages Commission. Asked if that wasn’t a conflict of interest, the alderman responded, “How does that conflict with my interests?”

Here’s another question: Why – given that Boston is a majority minority town – doesn’t the black community have a stronger power base here? Why do Boston’s prominent African-Americans routinely rise to the top of charitable groups and non-profit organizations, but rarely attain political power either locally or statewide? And why, in the end, does the paper have to rely on the white mayor of Boston – instead of the black community – to rescue it?

Maybe the Municipal Bay State Banner could look into that.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 5 Comments

Nailin’ Palin

Belated hat tip to the Wall Street Journal’s Thomas Frank, who gets the Palin drone just right in his column headlined “Poor, Persecuted Sarah Palin.”

Here’s the nut graf:

Indeed, if political figures stand for ideas, victimization is what Ms. Palin is all about. It is her brand, her myth. Ronald Reagan stood tall. John McCain was about service. Barack Obama has hope. Sarah Palin is a collector of grievances. She runs for high office by griping.

Her latest gripe? An op-ed in the Washington Post headlined “The ‘Cap and Tax’ Dead End.” In it, Palin says,

I am deeply concerned about President Obama’s cap-and-trade energy plan, and I believe it is an enormous threat to our economy. It would undermine our recovery over the short term and would inflict permanent damage.

A predictable complaint from the “Drill, baby, drill” babe. And an entirely understandable beef from the “Shill, baby, shill” babe that Palin has become now that she has a shot at capitalizing on what the Boston Phoenix calls “$arah, Inc.

Seems to me, Palin has no gripe at all.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Bucs Are Champs?

From a radio piece I wrote last July, on the occasion of the New York Yankees playing the Pittsburgh Pirates for the first time since the 1960 World Series:

[Maybe 20 years ago] the Missus asked me in an offhand way what my all-time favorite [baseball] team was. She had come across a mail-order company that sold reproductions of the hometown paper’s front page the day after a World Series win, and she wanted to get me one for my birthday.

I told her the 1960 New York Yankees.

Shortly thereafter, the Missus received the October 14, 1960 Pittsburgh Post-Gazette front page with the headline “BUCS ARE CHAMPS” in umpteen-point all-caps boldface. The Missus was, understandably, somewhat confused. She called the mail-order company and said, “No, I wanted the 1960 World Series front page.”

The mail-order gal replied, “Honey, you got the 1960 World Series front page.”

The 1960 World Series was one of the oddest – and greatest – ever. The Yankees won three laughers by a combined 35 runs, while the Pirates won three squeakers by a combined six runs.

Everyone knew which was the better team going into Game 7.

And then the Pirates prevailed.

Bill Mazeroski hit his legendary walk-off homer in the bottom of the ninth, breaking a 9-9 tie and the hearts of untold New York schoolboys, who learned one October afternoon that baseball is a beautiful, pitiless game.

Fast-forward twenty years to tonight, when the Missus gave me my presents for what most people would call a landmark birthday (suffice it to say I’ll no longer be using the great Raymond Chandler line “pushing 60 hard enough to break a wrist”). And what did I get?

A pristine ticket to the 1960 World Series Game 7 at Forbes Field (Sec. 18, Row D, Seat 17, First Floor Reserved, $7.70 tax included) – which is almost impossible to find – and a Pittsburgh Pirates World Series 1960 Official Souvenir Program with the Game 7 Scorecard filled in – which is almost almost impossible to find.

Bucs Are Champs?

Hell, the Missus is the real champ.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Mo, Mo, Mo

Just watched Mariano Rivera close out the All Star Game with a 1-2-3 shutdown of National League batters.

(Full disclosure: I’m an out Yankee fan and have been for all of my 35 years in Boston. Well, most of them, anyway. I kind of kept quiet while watching, in a downtown Boston watering hole, Bucky Dent’s improbable 1978 playoff game home run.)

Rivera is one of the true good guys in major league baseball – incredibly gifted, accomplished, and classy. There’s no question he’s lost something over the past few years (hey – the Red Sox have gotten far enough into his head they should be paying condo fees), but performances like tonight’s – his record-setting fourth All Star save – are a reminder of just how special Mo is.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 4 Comments

Buy This Post!

Here at the Global Worldwide Headquarters of Campaign Outsider, we continually strive to increase the worth of our content and the net worth of our hardworking staff.

Now, apparently, there’s a way to do both at the same time.

According to a New York Times piece yesterday, “For some bloggers, product sponsorships have become a lucrative side business.”

Hey, that could be me!

Here’s an example from the Times story:

TNT, for instance, is experimenting with a paid relationship with a popular blogger, Melanie Notkin, founder and chief executive of SavvyAuntie.com, a site that has carved out a demographic niche of professional aunts without children.

Ms. Notkin is sending out several messages to her more than 10,000 Twitter followers on Tuesday nights, when a new episode of “Saving Grace” is shown.

Ms. Notkin declined to disclose how much she is paid by TNT, only saying that she is “well compensated.” But she says she is upfront with her readers about the relationship with the network by labeling every commercial tweet with “[sp],” which stands for sponsored post.

“TNT never told me and will never tell me what to say,” Ms. Notkin stressed. “They want to associate with brands that people trust.”

Said brand, of course, being Ms. Notkin.

The beauty of those “sponsored posts” is that they’re so predictable, as the Times notes about another blogger.

[U]nlike postings in most journalism outlets or independent review sites, most companies can be assured that there will not be a negative review: if she does not like a product, she simply does not post anything about it.

That’s freedom of speech, yes?

So the question is (as my nephew Dan once asked), “how come them and not me?”

Final thoughts:

1) What should we call these blogging/flogging product plugs? How about  [sp]logs (see above)? Any way I can trademark that?

2) Call me, marketers! I’d be a good mule for you.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

What I Caught

The Missus and I went to the Big Town for a few days and here’s what we caught:

* The Isabel Toledo exhibit at The Museum at FIT. The Cuban-born fashion designer is a favorite of Michelle Obama and a knockout dressmaker – her intricate designs are like origami, the Missus said. Beyond that, you know a designer is special when half the people in the exhibit are fledgling designers sketching Toledo’s dresses.

* God of Carnage, in which James Gandolfini very convincingly plays not-Tony-Soprano and Marcia Gay Harden steals the show as his wife.

* The Treasure of Ulysses Davis, a terrific exhibit at the American Folk Art Museum. Davis was, the  museum said, “a Savannah, Georgia, barber who created a diverse but unified body of highly refined sculpture that reflects his deep faith, humor, and dignity.” Actually, the show’s a lot more fun than that.

* Mary Stuart, a historical drama that features dueling tours de force from Janet McTeer and Harriet Walter. In the end, the Missus and I voted for Walter.

* The Model as Muse: Embodying Fashion, an exhibit at the Metropolitan Museum of Art that celebrates “models’ styles  from 1947 to 1997.” The Missus dismissed it as eye candy for teenage girls, but I think it was even less substantial than that.

* The Pictures Generation at the Met. According to New York magazine, “The Met’s ‘Pictures’ show captures a moment when borrowing became cool” – that moment being 1974-1984 when “a group of American artists seized the means not of production but of reproduction.” Loose translation: They swiped a hodgepodge of images and called it art, achieving what the New Republic’s Jed Perl called (in a review of the Met’s Francis Bacon: A Centenary Retrospective, which the Missus and I did not bother seeing) “the trick of managing to be simultaneously empty and canny.”

* The Claes Oldenburg exhibit at the Whitney Museum of American Art, which demonstrated yet again that Oldenburg is sort of a one-trick pony.

* Dan Graham: Beyond at the Whitney, which embodied Jed Perl’s complaint about the “postmodern taste for muddleheaded irony.” In one of Graham’s works, which features cubicles with TVs playing video loops, I saw a young woman checking her text messages on a cellphone. Postmodern indeed.

* An eye-popping piece in the Weekly Standard – headlined “Horn of Plenty: Prez, Trane, Sonny – and Alan Greenspan?” – that chronicled the defunct Federal Reserve czar’s short, almost-illustrious career as a jazz musician. “Greenspan was a supple and dextrous improviser on the tenor sax who possessed a silky tone reminiscent of Lester Young,” the article by Joe Queenan says. But then, at a Greenwich Village gig in 1949, he foolishly challenged John Coltrane to an onstage showdown and “Trane smoked his ass.” Greenspan then took to “playing his horn every night on the Willamsburg Bridge” until “Sonny Rollins, arriving from his own thrashing at Coltrane’s hands,” happened along and got into a shoving match with Greenspan but then Ayn Rand (!) showed up and brought Greenspan back to her apartment and told him as a sax player he was “awfully reedy at the top of the register” but maybe he should “[think] of trying something else. Economics, perhaps?” The rest, of course, is history and your 401k.

* The 2009 Carroll Family Reunion, which brought together the Sonny-and-Agnes bracket  of the Carroll clan for its biennial mashup, which was pretty much the same as always, only more so. Mad props to Sonny’s Agnes (my father, Jack, and both his brothers married women named Agnes, so there was also Jackie’s Agnes and Dan’s Agnes), who is still rockin’ at age 96. Long may she rule.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

Gone Fishin’

Campaign Outsider will be, well, outside for the next few days.

Catch you (up) later.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Cog of War

Robert McNamara passes away (obits here and here) unlamented in this space. Ditto in Bob Herbert’s New York Times column.

Long after the horror of Vietnam was over, McNamara would concede, in remarks that were like salt in the still festering wounds of the loved ones of those who had died, that he had been “wrong, terribly wrong” about the war. I felt nothing but utter contempt for his concession.

The same cannot be said of some other supposedly diehard opponents of the Vietnam War.

In December of 2003 McNamara came to Boston for a Kennedy Library Forum with New York Times columnist Frank Rich and documentary filmmaker Errol Morris (transcript here), who had just released “The Fog of War: Eleven Lessons from the Life of Robert S. McNamara.”

In the SRO audience that day were assorted paleoliberals and goo-goos and New Frontierniks and dewy-eyed nostalgics who reminisced about The Best & The Brightest without a wisp of irony.

Their reaction to McNamara’s weepy performance?

Warm, enthusiastic, enthralled.

I kept thinking, “It’s bleeping Robert McNamara. What’s wrong with you people?”

Robert S. McNamara – the S stood for Strange, oddly – was the Typhoid Mary of the 1960s. You can find his fingerprints all over the ill-fated Bay of Pigs invasion, the Gulf of Potemkin – make that, Tonkin – escapade, and, of course, the travesty of the Vietnam War.

There’s not a wet eye in my household now that he’s gone.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Ads ‘n’ Ends

New York Is Now the Umpire State

While the New York State legislature is having a slapfight with itself (rendering Albany lawmakers even more ineffectual than usual), some people are picking up the slack for the slack-offs.

Problem is, although the inmates are no longer running the asylum, the goo-goos are.

Start with the fine folks at the State of New York Department of Health. They’ve launched a campaign called Tobacco Free Grocery that features a full-page newspaper ad that shows supermarket items such as bread, strawberries, Swiss cheese, broccoli, eggs – and a little pile of cigarettes.

“Which item doesn’t belong?” the headline asks. The copy asks readers to “Ask your supermarket to stop selling tobacco products.”

And if supermarkets don’t, New York City wants them to show photos of “blackened lungs, oozing decay” at the checkout counter. As New York Times columnist Clyde Haberman describes it, the city’s Department of Health and Mental Hygiene also wants people to see “what cancer of the mouth and throat look like.”

That’s on top of Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s campaign to cut salt intake in half at New York restaurants. Not to mention the city’s mandate to include calorie counts in restaurant menus and its ban on trans-fats.

New York: The Umpire State.

As in, you’re out.

Big Headache for Tylenol

So all of a sudden The Makers of Tylenol® are running – yes – full-page newspaper ads addressing “the safety of acetaminophen, the medicine in TYLENOL®.”

Here’s their pitch:

[When] used as directed, TYLENOL® is a safe trusted, and effective pain reliever . . .

However, as with any medicine, it’s important for you to know that misusing TYLENOL® can be harmful. If you take more than the recommended dose (overdose), you can cause serious liver injury.

The ad is a response to news reports that the FDA is mulling restrictions on acetaminophen after a series of accidental overdoses, including one last week.

Of course, seeing the current ad,  you can’t help but remember the Great Tylenol Tampering Scare  of 1982, in which seven people were killed in Chicago by cyanide-laced Tylenol. (It also doesn’t help that that unsolved case was recently reopened .)  In 1982, Tylenol’s response was a textbook example of effective crisis management, and the brand emerged largely intact.

In this case, though, it’s a category scare, not a brand scare. That’s a lot tougher to fight.

Somebody give The Makers of TYLENOL® an Excedrin.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Knocked From Pillar to Washington Post

It’s open season on the Washington Post.

The issue is a marketing initiative that not only blurred the line between the editorial and financial sides of the paper, but thoroughly sandblasted it.

Politico broke the story last Thursday with the headline, “Washington Post cancels lobbyist event amid uproar.”  Here’s the lede:

Washington Post publisher Katharine Weymouth said today she was canceling plans for an exclusive “salon” at her home where for as much as $250,000, the Post offered lobbyists and association executives off-the-record access to “those powerful few” — Obama administration officials, members of Congress, and even the paper’s own reporters and editor

Let’s stipulate that the whole “Dinner with Lally” thing is a certified concept-with-a-capital-K. More interesting is the name game that followed Politico’s scoop.

Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz labeled the proposed events “policy dinners,” while the New York Times gleefully dubbed them “Pay-for-Chat.” On leftist Alternet.org, it was, not surprisingly, a “sleazy newspaper scheme.”

Whatever you call it, the Post has clearly blurred the line enough that it should hire a Senior Editor, Optometry.

At first, Weymouth blamed the Post marketing department, which had produced a flier with the headline, “Underwriting Opportunity: An evening with the right people can alter the debate.” But, as Times media critic David Carr joyfully noted in a column snippier than a Newbury Street hair salon, that blame-mongering broke a Washington Post tradition: “[T]hose who are handed the sword,” he wrote, “generally fall on it when trouble comes.”

(Carr also merrily wrote this: “Theoretically, you can’t buy Washington Post reporters, but you can rent them.” Ouch.)

In Sunday’s Post, Weymouth published A Letter to Our Readers, in which she starts off taking full responsibility for the boneheaded enterprise:

I want to apologize for a planned new venture that went off track and for any cause we may have given you to doubt our independence and integrity.

But right after that, Weymouth again fingered the marketing department:

A flier distributed last week suggested that we were selling access to power brokers in Washington through dinners that were to take place at my home. The flier was not approved by me or newsroom editors, and it did not accurately reflect what we had in mind.

That reminded me of something the great W.C. Heinz said in an interview eight years ago. The legendary sportswriter (and co-author of the novel M*A*S*H)  told me that over all, he preferred boxing to team sports.  “I’m a great admirer of  team sports,” he said, “but there’s always someone you can lay it off on. And you can’t lay it off in a fight.”

Lally Weymouth is in a fight for the Post’s integrity. And she shouldn’t try to lay it off.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 4 Comments