Starbuckshot

Seems the pistol-packin’ set has invaded your local Starbucks (via the Wall Street Journal):

Starbucks Corp. and some other chain stores in the U.S. are finding themselves caught in the middle of a firearms debate, as gun-control advocates go up against a burgeoning campaign by gun owners to carry holstered pistols in public places.

The “open carry” movement, in which gun owners carry unconcealed handguns as they go about their everyday business, is loosely organized around the country but has been gaining traction in recent months.

Sounds more like a Dunkin’ Donuts thing, but why get technical about it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

New York’s Goobernatorial Follies

Most states are content to flame-broil one governor at a time (see: Rod Blagojevich, the Prairie State and James McGreevey, the Garden State).

Not the Empire State. New York has two on the barbie: Current Gov. David Paterson (D-Yankee Stadium) and former Gov. Eliot Spitzer (D-Client No. 9).

Thursday’s New York Times has a front-page story about Paterson’s lying under oath about receiving free tickets for Game 1 of the 2009 World’s Serious at Yankee Stadium, along with a report about a tell-all book detailing Spitzer’s gubernatorial flameout.

Excerpt:

The book’s emotional capstone is the agonizing final days of the Spitzer governorship. There is a disconsolate Mr. Spitzer weeping into the phone the night of March 9, after telling Mr. Constantine that he was about to be exposed. There are Mr. Constantine’s unfounded fears that suicidal tendencies might overtake the governor. And there were the desperate 11th-hour discussions about how Mr. Spitzer could hang on, including Mr. Constantine’s pitch that Mr. Spitzer should take a month off and go to a sexual rehabilitation clinic in Arizona.

That, he writes, would “have given New York State a good chance to visit with the Ghost of Christmas Future; they would have gotten a preview of Gov. David Paterson.”

Who can be found at, yes, Yankee Stadium.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Editors’ Note o’ the Day™

From Thursday’s New York Times:

Editors’ Note

A commentary published on Feb. 7, 2008, in the Arts section discussed the impact of the recently deceased Maharishi Mahesh Yogi on the Beatles and their music. The article mentioned in passing Alexis Mardas, known as “Magic Alex,” who worked on various inventions for the Beatles in the late 1960s and traveled with the group to the Maharishi’s ashram in India in 1968. While expressing skepticism about his work as an inventor during that period, the article did not accuse Mr. Mardas of engaging in fraudulent dealings or criminality, either then or at any subsequent time.

The article also said that the Beatles had a falling-out with the Maharishi after Mr. Mardas reported that the Maharishi had made improper advances toward a woman, a report the Beatles later came to doubt. The Times’s reporting on those events was attributed to Paul McCartney and based on widely published accounts from books and magazines, including some by those who were at the ashram. Mr. Mardas, who could not be reached prior to publication, has now denied that version of the events and provided The Times with a statement.

Good to know 13 months later.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Magazine Mazel Tov!

Here at the Global Worldwide Headquarters of Campaign Outsider, we welcome any new print publication, regressive as that might seem.

So the hardworking staff was all a-Twitter when the premiere edition of the Jewish Review of Books tumbled out of the ol’ mailbag.

The maiden voyage of the Jewish Review is nothing if not substantial, measuring a retro 14″ high by 11″ wide.

The obligatory “Welcome to the Jewish Review of Books” editorial begins this way:

This is an especially good time to launch a Jewish magazine of ideas and criticism. Perhaps it has always been a good time: the history of Jewish thought over the last two hundred years could be charted through a dozen periodicals in a half-dozen languages. But we live at a moment in which more Jewish books, and books of particular Jewish interest, are being published than ever before. Of the making of such books, it seems, there is no end. But of real criticism, considered judgment rendered in graceful, accessible prose, there is something of a scarcity.

So:

Bob Dylan: Messiah or Escape Artist?” by Ron Rosenbaum

and

“Why There Is No Jewish Narnia,” by  Michael Weingrad

Next question:

Why is there a Jewish Review?

Stay tuned.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Kausfiles Candidate Papers

This could be a hoot:

Mickey Kaus Takes Out Papers For U.S. Senate Run

Pioneering political blogger Mickey Kaus took out papers filed to run for U.S. Senate in California, he told LA Weekly. The Venice resident said he’ll run this year against Barbara Boxer for her seat. He said he took out filed papers at with the Los Angeles County Registrar of Voters, although a spokeswoman there could not yet confirm the filing.

The Democrat has been centrist and even conservative on some of the issues on which Boxer has taken a more left-leaning stand, including immigration: He does not favor amnesty and favors a more restrictive national policy.

Hard to know which will be more entertaining: Kaus’s quixotic run (book deal, anyone?), or the LA Weekly’s coverage of it.

Stay tuned.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Dead Blogging The Game Changers

So the hardworking staff trundled over to the International House of Politics Tuesday evening and here’s what we found:

The Shorenstein Center’s “Discussion with John Heilemann and Mark Halperin, authors of Game Change.” (Video not available at post time.)

Heilmann (D-New York),  Halperin (D-TIME), and moderator Susan Milligan (D-Boston Globe) were engaging, entertaining, and often enlightening.

Representative samples:

• When asked about their numerous confidential sources, Heilmann invoked Richard Ben Cramer’s monumental What It Takes, and said, “No one has taken issue with the facts in our book.”

• Heilmann: “John Edwards brought a lot of  things to the race but one thing he did not forget to bring was the crazy.”

• The seeds of Barack Obama’s current problems were sown in his presidential campaign. Obama’s professorial sensibility, confidence, small band of close advisors, and reluctance to change course – all asset in the 20o8 race – have not served him well in the White House.

• As for those vile calumnies that Game Change is all about political gossip, Heilmann defended the book as a chronicle of the “high human drama of politics,” while Halperin emphasize that the content was a “judicious and empathetic retelling of marital relationships”  (John and Elizabeth Edwards, Bill and Hillary Clinton, John and Cindy McCain) that were central to the 2008 presidential campaign.

Your punchline goes here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Mitchmania

Monday’s New York Times featured an op-ed mash note to Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels from mostly Web-ed columnist Ross Douthat.

Headline:

A Republican Surprise

Pull quote:

Murmurings about Mitch Daniels for 2012

That would be murmurings about a presidential run by Daniels. Who – surprise! –  found his way onto Monday’s Wall Street Journal op-ed page.

Go figure.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Campaign Outsider Cliché Patrol©

It’s sad when a nation loses its verbal heritage.

As the hardworking staff wrote in a radio commentary awhile back:

Amazing to tell, America may go down in history as the first civilization ever to forget its own clichés.

It’s amazing because clichés have always been a culture’s common linguistic currency. And right now America’s linguistic currency is being devalued faster than dollars in Zimbabwe.

[The 2008] presidential election has provided lots of examples of what we’ll call Mangled Phrase Syndrome. Back in April, MSNBC’s First Read online political digest reported that “the [Barack] Obama campaign has launched an intensive registration drive across North Carolina that has reached a pitch this week.”

It used to be things reached a fever pitch, but obviously politics is a lot cooler these days.

The following month, Obama told ABC’s Nightline that House of Clinton consigliere James Carville “is well-known for spouting off his mouth without always knowing what he’s talking about.”

What is he, Moby Dick? I always thought “spouting off” included somebody’s mouth.

Then there was the New York Times piece headlined “Clinton may be hopeful, but Obama rolls on.” The story noted that delegate numbers overwhelmingly favored Obama, but the mainstream media continued to float Hillary Clinton’s presidential boat.

The Times piece asserted “None of this is to say that Clinton has run out of string.” Of course, “run out the string” is the traditional phrase, but maybe Clinton actually did run out of string. She was certainly fit to be tied often enough.

When the parties’ nominating conventions finally arrived, we were treated to a whole new round of fractured phrases. MSNBC video savant Chris Matthews said of Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama, “They do everything right. They have great kids, they work their hearts off . . .”

That’s gotta be painful, eh?

The New York Times asked DNC delegates who would draw more contempt if he showed up at the Democratic National Convention: Cheatin’ John Edwards or Vichy Joe Lieberman?

“Lieberman, definitely,” a Texas delegate said. “If he showed his face, he’d have to leave town in the back of a trunk.”

Back, front – I think he means the trunk of a car.

On the international front, a New Republic magazine piece quoted a Beltway lobbyist describing Swaziland’s King Mswati III as “a great guy one-on-one,” but “real green behind the ears.”

I guess that’s what comes from not drying behind your ears when they’re wet.

And finally, a GOP operative told the New York Times that MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann “may be a bleeding liberal, and I don’t agree with his harshness toward Republicans, but I find his show entertaining and informative.”

Yes, well, not to be heartless, but bleeding liberals always did make good TV.

Cut to Monday’s Boston Herald, which added a new chapter to America’s Cliché Crackup in a piece about abandoned Boston homes.

Headline:

Mayor to owners of blighted Hub homes: Don’t lien on me

Lede:

Owners of boarded-up and blighted homes in the Hub are being warned by a fed-up Mayor Thomas M. Menino to come out of the shadows and settle with the city for more than $170,000 shelled out to secure the rotting properties.

Menino kicked off the festivities with this quote:

“You can’t run and hide”

Methinks the phrase is “You can run, but you can’t hide,” but me could be wrong.

After that, a Dorchester resident added this clichette:

“It’s down and out neglect”

That seems to be somewhere between “out and out” and “downright.”

Downright dizzying.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Boston Vaults Into The Past

As the Sunday Boston Globe reported, 14 local machers have joined forces to create a modern-day version of Boston’s vaunted Vault, a power-player business organization that flexed its corporate muscle in the ’50s and ’60s.

Formally known as the Coordinating Committee, the Vault consisted of 25 business leaders from downtown Boston who operated secretively and wielded great influence over public affairs through its policy positions and behind-the-scenes advocacy.

Cut to the current incarnation:

The executives . . .  have formed the Massachusetts Competitive Partnership. They include Raytheon Co. CEO William Swanson, Liberty Mutual’s Edmund Kelly, and Staples Inc.boss Ronald L. Sargent. The group has hired Dan O’Connell, the former state secretary of housing and economic development under Governor Deval Patrick, as its president.

“We believe there’s been a dilution in the business voice in the Commonwealth,’’ said the group’s chairman and cofounder, John Fish, chief executive of Suffolk Construction Co. in Boston. “We believe the business community can add tre mendous value to government. When it comes to creating jobs, we can offer a healthy perspective.’’

Healthy perspective?

The Massachusetts Competitive Partnership consists of 13 men and one woman.

All white.

Are you kidding me?

Coincidentally, Sunday’s Globe also included an op-ed by my Boston University colleague Bob Zelnick about “the so-called ‘under-representation’ of tenure-track minorities at leading institutions of higher learning.”

As part of his argument, Zelnick wrote this:

Some problems of under-representation barely concern us. Whites in the NBA, for example; ditto with blacks in the Metropolitan Opera, or for that matter, the Grand Old Opry.

Or, for further matter apparently, Boston’s corporate power structure.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

U.S. Politics = Bizarro World

Everything you need to know about the state of political discourse nowadays is contained in these two opinion pieces about Barack Obama’s Excellent Healthcare Summit:

Piece #1: Joe Klein’s post on Time’s Swampland blog:

Shame on me. I was elsewhere yesterday and missed the health care summit. I’m catching up now, and the tea leaves seem to indicate that Obama came out well ahead of the Republicans. How do I know that? From Matt Drudge, of course. I mean, Drudge’s takeaway from the summit is that the President talked a lot--actually, the President, the Congressional Democrats and Republicans each spoke an equal amount–the Times of London found it boring and the networks turned to other programming.

Reading between the lines, you can conclude that the Republicans had nothing very interesting, or clever, to say (and were never able to get the President’s goat). And that the President was his usual, unflappable, well-informed self.

Cut to Piece #2, Peggy Noonan’s Weekend Wall Street Journal column:

The way the meeting was arranged, the president was the teacher, the lecturer. Arrayed before him were the bright if occasionally unruly students. He was keen to establish that it was his meeting—he decides who speaks next and who should wrap up, he decides what is and is not “a legitimate point.” He was Mr. President, they were John and Lamar. He wielded a shiny pen like an anchorman eager to show depth and ease. He even said, “There was an imbalance in the opening statements because—I’m the president.” Yowza. Grace shows strength, accommodation shows security. This showed—well, not strength. When Rep. Eric Cantor attempted to make a sharp point, the president took the camera off him by calling for his aides and conferring with them as Mr. Cantor spoke.

The president has entered a boorish phase.

So the right says Obama is booring and boring (remember that Times of London piece).

And the left says Obama is unflappable and well-informed.

Welcome to the Fun House.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment