Rhyme-onyms

First: I yield to no man in my respect and affection for my students at Boston University.

Second: During my five years as a mass communication professor at BU, I’ve noticed a grammatical phenomenon in the writing of said students.

Rhyme-onyms.

Very often in their papers, students use the wrong word – but it rhymes with the right word.

Representative samples:

astutely aware for acutely aware

consul for counsel

conscious for conscience

dribble for drivel

reticule for ridicule (despite what you’re thinking, reticule is actually a word. It means “a woman’s drawstring handbag”)

menial for minimal

safety belt for safety net

captain for caption (couldn’t figure out if that was just a typo until -oops – it appeared for a second time)

My theory: the students have never read these words and phrases. They’ve only heard them.

And then their ears fail them.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 9 Comments

The Great Pete Rose/Bud Harrelson Dustup

Marty Lederhandler died last Thursday.

Via the Boston Globe:

Marty Lederhandler, an Associated Press photographer who captured on film every US president from Herbert Hoover to Bill Clinton, covered the D-day landing in 1944, and climaxed a 66-year career with an iconic shot of the World Trade Center attacks, has died at the age of 92.

Iconic shot of the World Trade Center attacks:

Another iconic Lederhandler image:

That’s the start of the legendary 1973 smackdown between Cincinnati Reds leftfielder Pete Rose and New York Mets shortstop Bud Harrelson.

I was living in Cincinnati in 1973 and I hated the self-righteous Big Red Machine and the thing I remember most about the Rose-Harrelson donnybrook was the dust they kicked up.

The dust that Marty Lederhandler captured perfectly.

P.S. – I’m happy to remind you that the Mets won that series.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Deval Patrick’s MisStart

Very nice segment on Saturday’s All Things Considered in which Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick talked about donating his father Pat’s musical archive to the Berklee College of Music.

Over the course of his career, Pat Patrick accompanied many jazz greats: John Coltrane,Thelonious MonkDuke Ellington. He was a career sideman.

His son, however, was born to lead.

Deval Patrick was elected governor of Massachusetts in 2006. Shortly after his inauguration, he came into possession of a vast archive of his late father’s work. Photographs, recordings, scores — a whole life in jazz packed into long-forgotten boxes.

Patrick donated that collection to Boston’s own Berklee College of Music, which this past week celebrated the opening of the Pat Patrick collection with a concert.

And NPR celebrated it with a Deval Patrick interview in which he recalled a really touching moment in his relationship with a largely absentee father:

Patrick saw his father play live many times, but he says one of the most memorable was on his 25th birthday.

“He was performing at a jazz club in Northeast Washington [D.C.] called Pigfoot, and he asked me to come by,” Patrick says. “I sat at a little table by myself, and he saw me come in. He said, ‘I want to dedicate this next number to my son, whose birthday is today.’ ”

His father then played the jazz standard “I Can’t Get Started,” and according to Deval, it summed up their relationship perfectly.

“He played this incredibly soulful solo, and we just locked eyes through the whole thing,” he says. “That was the best and most meaningful bridge for the two of us in finding a place for each other.”

Not to get technical about it, but Deval then failed to sum up the song perfectly. His version of the first verse:

I’ve been around the world in a plane.

I’ve started revolutions in Spain.

And the North Pole I’ve charted,

Still I can’t get started with you.

Except it’s “I’ve settled revolutions in Spain.”

Any relevance to Patrick’s current reelection battle?

Discuss among yourselves.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Cambridge Chronicle Unfair To State Senate Candidates?

Chris Moyer (an excellent former student of mine who now resides in – good lord! – Las Vegas) sent along this e-misssive the other day:

I came across a posting on the Cambridge Chronicle website that’s right up your (blog’s) alley:

http://blogs.wickedlocal.com/cambridge/2010/03/25/speakout-an-anonymous-persons-impression-on-the-state-senate-race/#comments

Does this strike you as journalism at its worst, or what?  To anonymously slander all but one candidate in that race is cowardly and the type of stuff you’d find in bathroom stalls, or, in the 21st century, in the “comments” section that follows any given online story.  I think this is an embarrassment to the Chronicle and should not go unnoticed. The only reason I even noticed this is because one of the candidates, Dan Hill, is my cousin; but that anonymous writer is an equal opportunity slanderer against all candidates but Flaherty.

Consider it noticed, Chris.

The Chronicle post:

SpeakOut: An anonymous person’s impression on the state Senate race

Hi, I guess my last message might have gone dead because my phone died. I was calling about the state senate candidate late last week.  I wanted to give my impression on the candidates.

First up we had Dan Hill from Charlestown who quite frankly was clueless both in terms of relations with people, and his ideas were quite frankly off the wall. I doubt if he will win Charlestown.

Next up was Dennis Benzan. Dennis is a decent guy, has a great story from Cambridge, but quite frankly doesn’t project in this race. It is hard seeing him winning Cambridge or anywhere else in the district.

Next is Denise Simmons. Denise is a wonderful lady, and did some good things here in Cambridge. Fact she may win Cambridge. But it’s hard seeing her doing much outside the district. She just didn’t have much specifics of and all the things she supposedly she did as mayor and city councilor. She didn’t mention the manager in any of those issues.

Next up was Michael Albano, son of State Sen. Sal Albano. Michael definitely has the passion for the seat but his solutions don’t really make much sense. His suggestion for solving property tax issues is a gradual income tax, which might be good, but it couldn’t happen for three or four years, if he had a ballot question. His second idea in terms of solving healthcare was a national public option, which isn’t going to happen either. Michael may do well in Chelsea, and Somerville, but it is hard seeing him winning the race.

The biggest disappointment for the night had to be Sal DiDomenico. For a guy who served as Anthony Galluccio’s chief of staff for a couple of years, he really didn’t have many specifics. He talked a lot in general. It is hard seeing him winning this.

Finally we had Tim Flaherty who is quite a good surprise for the evening. He was very articulate on the issues. He would be a real star if he got elected. That is my take. Thanks a lot.

The question is: Would the Chronicle have put this in its dead-tree edition? Or is the Web a whole nother matter?

I’ve forwarded this post to the editor of the Chronicle. I’ll keep you posted.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 2 Comments

It’s Good To Live In A Two-Newspaper Town (Maddow As Hell Edition)

Friday’s Boston Globe featured a full-page open letter from MSNBC host Rachel Maddow about . . . well, just read it:

The Friday Globe failed to actually report on the dustup, but the Boston Herald – Tabloids Rule! – ran a piece headlined Maddow slams “creep” Brown.

Maddow’s response, via the Herald:

“Scott Brown made this up in order to make money off my name and likeness and I think he should stop. And I think he should apologize.”

Maddow, who lives in western Massachusetts, called Brown a “creep” in a planned MSNBC newspaper ad scheduled to run today and slammed him for sending out a nationwide fund-raising letter this week “smearing me to raise money for himself.”

Except Maddow never did call Brown a creep in the ad.

But why get technical about it when you’re dealing with the Herald?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

NPR You Serious?

I meant to mention this last night before I got caught up in Muskie-mania.

Newsflash! NPR Changes Abortion Language.

National Public Radio ombudsman Alicia Shepard wrote this week about a “lively debate” among NPR editors concerning the use of the terms “pro-choice” and “pro-life.”

The result? This memo “distributed to all NPR staff.”

NPR News is revising the terms we use to describe people and groups involved in the abortion debate.

This updated policy is aimed at ensuring the words we speak and write are as clear, consistent and neutral as possible. This is important given that written text is such an integral part of our work.

On the air, we should use “abortion rights supporter(s)/advocate(s)” and “abortion rights opponent(s)” or derivations thereof (for example: “advocates of abortion rights”). It is acceptable to use the phrase “anti-abortion”, but do not use the term “pro-abortion rights”.

Digital News will continue to use the AP style book for online content, which mirrors the revised NPR policy.

Do not use “pro-life” and “pro-choice” in copy except when used in the name of a group. Of course, when the terms are used in an actuality they should remain.” [An actuality is a clip of tape of someone talking. So if a source uses those terms, NPR will not edit them out.]

Thanks
David

David Sweeney
Managing Editor

Wait a second.

It is acceptable to use the phrase “anti-abortion”, but do not use the term “pro-abortion rights”.

Are you kidding me? How is that “as clear, consistent and neutral as possible”?

If NPR wanted to put a Kiss Me, I’m Liberal sticker on itself, it couldn’t have done a better job.

The hardworking staff at Campaign Outsider will momentarily be forwarding this post to NPR ombud Alicia Shepard to ask the following:

Would NPR editors please have a lively debate about how in the hell they expect to appear unbiased when they make decisions like this?

Thank you in advance.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Go (Home, Alas), Muskies!

I’m an even prouder alum of Xavier University (although it’s still unlikely I’ll give them any money) after tonight’s knee-buckling, double-overtime loss to Kansas State in the NCAA hoop hootenanny.

Damn! Those K-State shooters had ice icewater in their veins, didn’t they?

Via espn.com:

Here’s some of the action, via YouTube:

Great game, no matter who won.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

It’s Good To Live In A Two-Newspaper Town (con.)

What started out as a low-key-page-one-below-the-fold story in Tuesday’s Boston Globe . . .

Brown pauses, then backs Republican repeal effort

. . . turned into a high-pitched PAGE ONE SCREAMER in Wednesday’s Boston Herald:

The Page 4 piece is a hoot, never mentioning Brown’s supposed transgression (not supporting healthcare-reform repeal before supporting it), but only noting the reaction to it.

To wit:

“If he were a milk carton, he would be expired,” said Massachusetts Democratic Party chairman John Walsh.

“We start to wonder whether we helped a RINO (Republican in name only) get into office,” said Tea Party activist Jeffrey McQueen

Democratic consultant Dan Payne agreed, saying, “He’s really being revealed as a guy who’s in over his head.”

So:

Was the official expiration date of Massachusetts Sen. Scott Brown (R-Barn Coat) March 23, 2010, the day Pres. Obama signed healthcare reform legislation into law?

As Bob’s Discount Furniture weirdo Bob would say:

I doubt it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Headline o’ the Day™

From Wednesday’s Boston Globe:

Exercise remains effective tool in fighting obesity, study finds

The Missus: “Ya think?”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Free The City Hall One!

From our Late to the Party desk:

The umpteenth Boston Globe piece (in Sunday’s edition) on Boston City Hall as the ugliest building in town, at least according to local residents.

Maybe . . . But wait! Don’t answer yet!

Here’s the Globe’s “In praise of ugly buildings” slideshow.

And the Globe’s January “In praise of ugly buildings” piece.

Better you should read Ada Louise Huxtable’s 1969 New York Times review of the just finished Boston City Hall.

Excerpt:

Boston can celebrate with the knowledge that it has produced a superior public building in an age that values cheapness over quality as a form of public virtue. It also has one of the handsomest buildings around, and thus far, one of the least understood.

It is a product of this moment and these times – something that can be said of successful art of any period. And it is a winner, in more ways than one.

And now, Boston City Hall is a loser.

In more ways than one.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 7 Comments