WBUR’s David Boeri reported Friday on the case of former U.S. Assistant Attorney Jeffrey Auerhahn, “who has been under a cloud of suspicion since 2003 when a federal judge accused him of outrageous misconduct” in rigging a case against Mafia lieutenant Vinny (The Animal) Ferrara.
Now in a significant but quiet move, a panel of federal judges has lifted the cloud for Auerhahn, who was facing disciplinary action while handing the court’s chief judge a rebuke.
That’s grating enough. But then there was Auerhahn’s response (through his mouthpiece, naturally):
On behalf of Jeffrey Auerhahn, his attorney Michael Ricciuti released a statement that, “We are gratified by this result and the due process afforded to Mr. Auerhahn in the district of Massachusetts. We deeply appreciate the panel’s careful attention to this case, its fulsome examination of the detailed record, and its thoughtful decision.”
Not to get technical about it, but the definition of fulsome is, “offensively flattering or insincere.” Which oddly does and does not fit this situation.
Don’t even get us started about noisome.
Campaign Outsider 
The US District Court of Massachusetts is in fact a criminal enterprise where attorneys and court staff are exempt from law, promotes corporate dictatorship over the entitled democracy we are led to believe exist and ensures cushy tax payer supported jobs and profit for what is considered “elite” but actually corrupt law firms. Chief Judge Wolf’s description of public corruption and white collar crime during the DiMasi case has been that these types of crime are the bigger danger to society but the corrupt court systems are in fact the biggest danger faced by our society. The victims of the court criminal enterprise do not make the paper nor do the domestic terrorist who have delegitimized the judiciary branch of our government as they freely commit federal crimes and deny constitutional rights; there is no fear of consequence. It is all a very dirty game and through taxes we are forced to support the criminals playing the game. It’s interesting that the Auerahahn case after sitting stagnant for nine months is quietly and suddenly decided; the court could use the DOJ in their pocket at the moment. DiMasi will, also, stay free pending appeal—too much for the court to lose if he does not because the pot will not be allowed to send the kettle off to prison without an uproar. Judge O’Toole’s docket clerk scanned this decision which was required because of the hand signatures but guess which computer he used to scan the document before he entered and filed the decision! Pretty handy having those PDF properties for this particular memorandum and order. Note of interest-Sorokin was Judge Zobel’s clerk in the past. I guess we will have to wait and see how sincere AG Ortiz is about cleaning up corruption. Happy Constitution Day America.
Massachusetts corrupt clerks, Magistrate Judge and elite attorneys run a criminal enterprise and the Circuit Executive Office is just as dirty.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/62737753 http://www.scribd.com/doc/64299428/Cover-Up-of-Corruption-and-Violation-of-Constitutional-Rights-in-the-US-District-Court-of-Massachusetts-With-Published-Opinion-Drafted-by-and-Submitte
Thanks, I heard that and thought I had heard it wrong.
I’m a journalism student at the Harvard Extension School, and I’m writing a feature on David Boeri. He was a great interviewee, but I need some other sources for this piece. Would you be willing to let me ask you a few questions via phone or email?
Thanks for considering!
Natalie Ramm
ramm.natalie@gmail.com