NPR anchor Steve Inskeep’s Wall Street Journal op-ed last week defending NPR against charges of liberal bias has thus far drawn numerous Letters to the Editor and even more Web comments (919 by last count).
Representative sample:
- William Ledsham wrote:
- Harvey Sorenson replied:
- Sara Stevenson replied:
- Krishnan Chittur replied:
- Krishnan Chittur replied:
- Steve Ropa replied:
While based on my experience discussing things with liberals I tend to agree, I wouldn’t want to paint with such a broad brush. It is true that in many cases I run into an assumption that since I am conservative I must not be very bright or well informed (went to a major east coast university on a full academic scholarship, so I *think* i’m smarter than the average bear) or merely closed minded.
That said, Sara points out that she is liberal and subscribes. I’m sure there is quite a large demographic of liberals who read the WSJ for its in depth business news, just as many of us conservatives listen to NPR for its news and other entertainments. So if we apply Mr. Inskeep’s logic, this means the government should be funding the Wall Street Journal?
- John Smyth replied:
- Frank Castle replied:
- THOMAS LARROWE replied:
Harvey, I am glad to hear that you are open minded, but myself being moderate, i would have to disagree that conservatives are “much more” open minded! To be honest, depending on how “hard-core” the person is on either side they can be VERY stubborn. But in general I would have to say that liberals are SLIGHTLY more open minded. Look at the issues.
- emory kendrick replied:
Equally true of WSJ commenters: They can’t help it.




Really? Blog posting by regurgitating mostly inane comments from some other website?
If number of comments is the determining factor in newsworthiness, then you should be running day after day of Tiger Mother comments here!
All you’ve demonstrated is that WSJ commenters are only somewhat less obnoxious than Boston Herald commenters.
No need to get prissy about it, Michael. Just giving people a taste in case they don’t get to the Journal.
… but Slim Gaillard nailed the seeds to the roof. Let them try that at the WSJ.