Jiltin’ Joe

Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (D-I Control You) is currently off the reservation on the Obamacare front.

Headline from Tuesday New York Times piece:  “Lieberman Rules Out Voting for Health Bill.”


In a surprise setback for Democratic leaders, Senator Joseph I. Lieberman, independent of Connecticut, said on Sunday that he would vote against the health care legislation in its current form.

A surprise, because Jiltin’ Joe junked his previous support for expanding Medicare coverage to “let uninsured people 55 to 64 years old purchase coverage under Medicare.”

From MSNBC’s First Read:

*** Principle or Politics? There’s now growing evidence that Lieberman’s objection to the Medicare “buy-in” compromise isn’t necessarily based on principle. Yesterday, a video from this past September made the rounds that showed Lieberman clearly stating he supports expanding Medicare to those in their 50s. In addition, while Lieberman has been a hawk on national security issues, he’s been a consistent liberal on economic ones. According to National Journal’s vote ratings for 2008, he was MORE LIBERAL than 68% of the Senate on economic issues, putting him squarely in the Democratic mainstream. (By comparison, he was more liberal than just 38% of the chamber on foreign affairs, placing him to the right of the Dem caucus.) In 2007, he was more liberal than 72% of the Senate on the economy, and his ratings for 2005 and 2006 were similar. Bottom line: It appears Lieberman is acting a bit out of character on this issue, given his history of being a rank-and-file Democrat (leaning liberal/progressive) on domestic issues. This is why the charge of playing politics with the left is looking so believable to some.

Somebody, please, give Joe Lieberman a dope slap.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Jiltin’ Joe

  1. Steve Stein says:

    A correction: Joe Lieberman is not D-anything. (Yes I realize that was a snarky party label, but at least you could make it an accurate snarky party label.) He ran for Senate in 2006 and won as a candidate of the “Connecticut for Lieberman” party.

    Notice, it’s not the “Lieberman for Connecticut” party. It’s apparent that Joe doesn’t represent Connecticut, he only represents the insurance companies based there.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s