It’s Good To Live In A Two-Newspaper Town (Philip Markoff Edition)

The Boston dailies’ second-day coverage of Craigslist killer Philip Markoff’s apparent jailhouse suicide really separated the sheep from the goats, as Fr. Fahey used to say back at Fordham Prep in the ’60s.

Tuesday Boston Globe headline:

Markoff scrawled messages in blood

Tuesday Boston Herald headline:

Source: Philip Markoff was ‘hell-bent’ on killing self

Globe lede:

In a macabre twist in the already bizarre tale of Philip Markoff, the accused Craigslist killer scrawled in blood the name Megan, that of his onetime fiancee, and the word pocket on his jail cell wall before dying, four law enforcement officials with knowledge of the case said.

Herald lede:

Hub corrections officers — fearing they’ll be scapegoated for the high-profile death of Philip Markoff — wondered yesterday why the accused Craigslist killer wasn’t kept on suicide watch, even as officials launched a sweeping probe into the blood-soaked cell horror.

Other distinctions:

1) At least from the respective reports, Suffolk County Sheriff Andrea Cabral was more forthcoming with the Globe than the Herald

2) Only the Herald used the word “shank

3) Only the Globe had this: “A Boston trauma surgeon said that if Markoff sliced the carotid artery in the neck and placed a bag over his head, he could have died within 10 minutes.”

But it was the opinion pieces in the Boston dailies that really crystallized their differences.

From the Globe’s VoxOp feature:

“Being under a suicide watch is obviously pointless at the Nashua jail. Philip Markoff was found suffocated and alone in his cell this morning in an apparent suicide. An investigation is underway, but that won’t bring Markoff back to his family or those that loved him, and it certainly isn’t justice for his victim’s families and loved ones. How does someone suffocate themselves while on a suicide watch?’’

JOANNE THOMAS

http://www.rightjuris.com

A Globe editorial added this:

If not exactly predictable, Markoff’s suicide shouldn’t come as a shock. He had been placed on suicide precautions in April 2009 when a staffer observed suspicious marks on his neck consistent with a hanging attempt. Severed social relations are a factor in inmate suicide attempts. Markoff’s body was discovered one day after what would have been the one-year anniversary of his cancelled wedding to his college sweetheart.

Nowhere did the editorial note that Markoff was no longer on suicide watch – a fact VoxOp blogger Joanne Thomas also conveniently ignored.

Meanwhile, the Herald had dueling opinion pieces about the effect of Markoff’s abrupt demise on the family of his alleged victim, Julissa Brisman.

Margery Eagan headline:

Cowardly act spared Brismans lifetime of pain

Laurel J. Sweet headline (technically not an opinion piece, but “Analysis”):

Suicide dashes hopes for truth

So to review, class: Who’s the sheep and who’s the goat here?

You tell us.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Dead Blogging The Cape Wind Gubernatorial Debate

As Bob Keough (late of MassINC and currently of the Massachusetts Energy and Environmental Affairs office) happily remarked afterward, (paraphrase here) who woulda thunk that the first gubernatorial debate would be about Cape Wind?

But it was.

And it was pretty good – an engaging, substantive hour of good green talk. In general, the debate mirrored the gubernatorial race itself: 3 on 1.

Gov. Deval Patrick is all for putting the wind turbine farm in Nantucket Sound, while his opponents – Republican Charlie Baker, Independent Tim Cahill, and Green-Rainbow Jill Stein – are all against it for a variety of reasons.

Those differences were hashed out in detail during the debate. Among the highlights:

The Numbers Racket

The candidates spun a head-spinning array of figures throughout the hour, from electricity rates to Cape Wind building costs to Massachusetts taxpayer subsidies to green-energy employment projections.

Winner: Wikipedia.

Auto Immunity

During the lightning round, the candidates were asked to catalogue the cars they own.

Winner (technically – or technologically): Jill Stein, who drives a Prius hybrid.

Winner (real world division): Charlie Baker, who owns a ’66 Mustang.

Pay-to-Flay

Stein went after Patrick three times for taking campaign contributions from Cape Wind-associated businesses and state utilities, creating a pay-for-play climate on Beacon Hill. In her third foray, Stein asked the governor if he was willing to return the special-interest money and restore trust in state government.

Apparently three times was the harm, because Patrick finally defended his honor, asserting that he took no Cape Wind money while “deciding my position” on the project, and insisting that he has always pursued the best interests of Massachusetts in spite of the contributions.

Winner: Probably Stein, but it doesn’t really matter.

Tasty Bites

Patrick: This project is good from an environmental/energy/economical/symbolic point of view.

Cahill: Government shouldn’t be picking winners and losers in the private sector.

Baker: First, do no harm financially

Stein: The move to renewable energy is the task of our generation.

Winner: All four. And anyone who sees the debate.

(The hardworking staff assumes MassINC will eventually post the video on its website.)

UPDATE: And they did.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 5 Comments

What Can Brown Do For You? (Barn Jacket Division)

You can’t spit without hitting a Scott Brown wannabe these days.

Sunday Boston Globe headline:

In N.H., candidates test Brown formula

The front-page piece chronicles the efforts by four New Hampshire US Senate hopefuls to Brownify themselves. Nut graf:

In this hotly contested race to fill the Senate seat being vacated by Republican Judd Gregg, all four major Republican contenders are doing what they can to invoke the sensibility, style, and sheer name power of the Massachusetts Republican who defied predictions early this year and catapulted himself into office with an everyman campaign that won hearts across the state.

One wears a Brownesque barn jacket, another touts her regular-gal ride:

Kelly Ayotte, the former attorney general, has said on the campaign trail: “Watch out, Scott Brown! I can drive a truck with a snowplow on it!’’

Regular-guy reaction: How lame is that?

Chin-strokerati reaction:

“Candidates are donning the cloak, or barn jacket, that is Scott Brown,’’ said Wayne Lesperance, a political science professor at New England College in Henniker, N.H. “They see the Scott Brown formula as the formula that’s been successful.’’

Except it’s not a formula.

Scott Brown’s Excellent Adventure was a happy confluence of events, a dynamic rooted in a particular time and place. You can’t reproduce it and you can’t recreate it.

All the New Hampshire Brownnabes have done is adopt the outward trappings of it – which likely means they’re ignoring their particular time and place, thereby squandering the opportunity to create their own dynamic.

Questions for the Granite State Gang:

Do you have a camera-ready wife and an “American Idol” daughter? Is your opponent as tin-earred and ham-handed as Martha Coakley? Can you convincingly say, “This is not Judd Gregg’s seat. This is the people’s seat”?

I don’t know Scott Brown. I’m not a friend of Scott Brown.  But you New Hampshire candidates are no Scott Brown.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

Campaign Outsider Truth-In-Advertising Watch (pat. pending)

Because of a global-warming-induced cookie-making drought, the hardworking staff has lately had to substitute bought chocolate chip cookies for homemade.

So we turned to the purveyor of all foods tasty, Trader Joe’s, and their “soft & chewy” chocolate chips.

Except they’re not soft & chewy. (At best, they’re soft & cakey.)

But they’re not bad, either.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The WSJ/NYT Slapfight (pat. pending)

Exhibit Umpteen in the Wall Street Journal’s attempted death-by-a-thousand-paper-cuts of the New York Times:

Seth Lipsky’s Weekend Edition op-ed piece.

Lede:

It will be hard to find a more overdue newspaper “correction” than that issued last Saturday by the New York Times regarding Gen. John D. Lavelle. The general has been dead since 1979 when, at the age of 62, he died of a heart attack. It could also be said that he died of a broken heart after the New York Times, among others, helped stir a controversy that got him demoted for making unauthorized attacks on North Vietnam.

The Times’ correction comes after President Barack Obama asked the Senate to restore Lavelle’s rank, posthumously, to four stars. That would right a rush to judgment in a controversy in which, nearly 40 years ago, the Times had fretted about runaway military officers ignoring civilian authority. There were, it turns out, no runaway generals—just runaway critics of the war.

Newly declassified archival material confirms that the attacks for which the general was demoted were indeed authorized, just as the general had maintained in the years after his retirement.

The Times correction begins this way: “Because of a cover-up, cowardice and scapegoating in the Nixon White House, editorials on this page in the early 1970s misstated the role of an Air Force general in a series of bombing raids of North Vietnam.”

Lipsky’s piece is worth reading in and of itself – especially for its depiction of Richard Nixon’s loss of nerve and character (he had authorized the bombing raids) in throwing Lavelle under the bus.

But it’s also interesting as the latest salvo of the U.S.S. Rupert Murdoch against the Old Gray Lady.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Dead Palin Bounce

Really, how stupid do you have to be to get elected in New Hampshire?

Friday Boston Globe headline:

Two N.H. lawmakers in hot water over Facebook posts about Palin

Rep. Timothy Horgan of Durham resigned after he wrote on his Facebook page that a “dead Palin wd be even more dangerous than a live one,’’ and said she “is all about her myth & if she was dead she cdn’t commit any more gaffes.’’

Right. Like Horgan’s.

Next up:

Keith Halloran, a House candidate from Rindge, apologized yesterday for posting a death wish for Palin on Facebook.

Halloran had commented Tuesday in response to a Republican lawmaker’s post about the plane crash that killed former Alaska senator Ted Stevens. When the lawmaker expressed disappointment that some news accounts of Stevens’s death focused on negative aspects of his career, Halloran responded: “Just wish Sarah and Levy were on board,’’ an apparent reference to Palin and her daughter’s former boyfriend, Levi Johnston.

So, to summarize: At least part of the New Hampshire media-political complex is a bunch of idiots.

But we’re not quite ready to say that on Facebook.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Your Democracy At Work

Eye-opening piece in Friday’s Wall Street Journal.

Headline:

How to Fix a Dysfunctional Senate: Cut 98 Senators

Lede:

WASHINGTON—Apparently the Senate can work quickly after all. You just have to limit it to two senators.

On Thursday, the chamber approved a $600 million border-security bill in 31 minutes, from opening gavel to final passage. While their colleagues were enjoying a summer recess, Sen. Chuck Schumer flew in from New York and Sen. Ben Cardin drove his Pontiac from Baltimore to represent the entire Senate in the cavernous chamber.

And that was it: Schumer and Cardin and $600 million of your money.

Is this a great country, or what?

Right now, I’d pick the latter.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

This Is Exactly Why The MBTA Accepts NO Advocacy Ads

Major dustup in New York around this transit ad “submitted by a group opposed to the construction of a mosque and Islamic center near ground zero” (via Thursday’s New York Times):

The back story:

The [Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s] advertising firm initially rejected the advertisement as unsuitable, repeatedly requesting changes to the photograph of the twin towers, according to a federal lawsuit filed last week by the advertisement’s sponsor, the American Freedom Defense Initiative, and its leader, the prominent right-wing blogger Pamela Geller, who argued that her right to free speech had been infringed.

On Monday, the authority relented, saying it would allow the advertisement to run in its original form. It is expected to appear next week on more than 20 city buses.

That’s because once you accept any advocacy ads (which the MTA has done on numerous occasions), you have to accept them all.

And that – along with tens of millions of dollars squandered on hopeless legal action during the past two decades – is why the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority no longer provides the public with even a semblance of political/public policy debate.

The MBTA has been burned so many times in court, it should be checked into the Shriners.

So they checked out.

No matter what you think of the New York ad, though, isn’t it better to have more public discourse than less?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Weekly Standard ‘All In’ On Massachusetts Gambling

The hardworking staff at Campaign Outsider is the first to admit that our attention to the Bay State’s casino gambling rumpus has been more occasional than tenacious.

Perhaps because of that, we found this Christopher Caldwell piece in the current issue of the Weekly Standard very interesting.

Headline:

Deval Patrick’s Racino Problem

Why Massachusetts pols are addicted to gambling.

Two quotes of note:

#1

The best explanation for why gambling failed despite all the votes in favor of it, is that the Democrats in the state house needed gambling to fail and they needed to vote in favor of it.

They needed to be on-record as supporting mega-casinos because Patrick has turned the gambling industry into a lifeline of campaign funding for his allies. Slot machine companies, scratch card companies, racetrack developers, and others are among the biggest contributors to Massachusetts politicians.

#2

At the same time, Patrick, [House Speaker Robert] DeLeo, and their allies need gambling to fail because gambling is terrible public policy. Promises of huge revenue streams always accompany its introduction, but these are easily enough debunked in theory, and other states have failed to realize them in practice.

Caldwell also says this in reference to the casino vs. racino debate:

It is this distinction between working-class and upper-class gambling that most Massachusetts pundits seized on when they sought to explain the ostensible breach between Patrick and DeLeo. The split in Massachusetts politics is one not of party, but of class.

Massachusetts casino gambling mavens, please weigh in.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment