2012 Election Man Date: Barack Obama & Mitch McConnell

Republicans and Democrats are both claiming that the 2012 election results are a mandate for . . . well, whatever they want.

Version 1: New Taxes on the Rich

From Saturday’s New York Times front page:

Obama to Insist on Tax Increase for the Wealthy

WASHINGTON — President Obama said Friday that he would insist that tax increases on affluent Americans be part of any agreement to avoid a year-end fiscal crisis, setting up a possible confrontation with Congressional Republicans who say they will oppose a rise in tax rates for the rich.

In his first remarks from the White House since his re-election, Mr. Obama made it clear that he believed his victory had validated his relentless campaign call for wealthier Americans to pay more and that he expected Republicans to heed that message.

“I just want to point out this was a central question during the election,” he said in brief remarks in the East Room. “It was debated over and over again. And on Tuesday night, we found out that the majority of Americans agree with my approach.”

Except, maybe, for the majority of Republicans.

Version 2: No New Taxes on the Rich

From Saturday’s Wall Street Journal Weekend Interview:

Mitch McConnell: ‘We Have a Voter Mandate Not to Raise Taxes’

In the wake of President Barack Obama’s electoral victory, gleeful Democrats believe that the impending “fiscal cliff” has Republicans trapped into finally accepting higher tax rates. But as Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell sits for an interview in his Capitol office 48 hours after the election, one thing is certain: He is in no way chastened by Tuesday’s results. If Mr. Obama wants fiscal hand-to-hand combat, he will get it.

“Let me put it very clearly,” says the five-term Republican senator from Kentucky. “I am not willing to raise taxes to turn off the sequester. Period.” On Jan. 1, Washington faces both a huge tax increase and an automatic spending cut known as the “sequester,” which could tip the economy back into recession. A newly emboldened President Obama is likely to take his soak-the-rich case straight to the people, I remind the senator. The political pressure to capitulate could become intense.

“Look, he may think it would be helpful to his presidency to continue to divide and demonize us,” says Mr. McConnell. “But my answer will still be short and firm: No. We won’t agree to any tax increases that will hurt the economy.”

Sounds like a fiscal cliffhanger to us.

 

About these ads
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to 2012 Election Man Date: Barack Obama & Mitch McConnell

  1. I have some news for Mitch McConnell. Although he says “No. We won’t agree to any tax increases”, he already did. 2003 H.R. 2 provided for the tax hikes that will now automatically occur on Jan 1, 2012. McConnell voted “yes”. So, senator?

  2. I have a sinking feeling they’ll find a way to agree on getting rid of the mortgage interest deduction. #WeLoseAgain

  3. Bob Gardner says:

    If only we could lose the mortgage interest deduction. .. . It’s a tax on tenants. My guess is that they will find some way to keep from reinstituing the estate tax.

    • A tax on tenants because it helps people buy houses who wouldn’t otherwise be able to? That’s what “building from the middle out” means.

      • Curmudgeon says:

        You forget that “people {who} by houses who wouldn’t otherwise be able to is the primary cause of the economic mess that we face today.

        I wouldn’t go selling that point if I were you.

      • Campaign Outsider says:

        I’m not selling anything, Mudge. Just passing it along.

      • I’m not referring to those who the mortgage industry gave loans to knowing they’d be foreclosing on them in 3 years so they could re-sell the house to the next sucker who couldn’t afford it.

        I mean the great bulk of home buyers, for whom the deduction is crucial. You know – the middle class. Unless you paid cash for, or inherited, your house, you know exactly who I mean. There’s 50 million of us.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s