Campaign Outsider

Entries from January 2010

New York Times Gives Blogosphere Props

January 31, 2010 · 3 Comments

For all the ripping off of blogs the mainstream media does (see Adam Gaffin’s Universal Hub takedown of the Boston Globe last week), sometimes the MSM actually does the right thing.

Exhibit A:

Saturday’s New York Times item about the art world’s Super Bowl smackdown:

It’s not only mayors and inveterate gamblers who place bets on the Super Bowl — art museums do, too. The Times-Picayune of New Orleans reported that the New Orleans Museum of Art and the Indianapolis Museum of Art have placed a friendly wager on the outcome of the big game on Feb. 7: if the New Orleans Saints win, the Indianapolis museum will send “The Fifth Plague of Egypt” — that is, the landscape from its collection painted by J.M.W. Turner in 1800 — to the New Orleans museum, which gets to hang it for three months. If the Indianapolis Colts prevail, the New Orleans institution will send the painting “Ideal View of Tivoli,” a 1644 work by Claude Lorrain, to Indianapolis for three months.

And here’s the bloggy shot:

The Times-Picayune said the bet was instigated by Tyler Green, who writes the Modern Art Notes blog for artsjournal.com, and who helped egg on some tongue-in-cheek trash talk between the museums’ directors.

Can you imagine Boston Museum of Fine Arts director Malcolm Rogers Super Bowl trash-talkin’ with, say, Thomas Campbell of the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York?

Yeah, me neither.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , , ,

NPR’s Mortal Zinn

January 30, 2010 · 3 Comments

Thursday’s Howard Zinn obit on NPR’s All Things Considered included, as the hardworking staff at Campaign Outsider noted, this brickbat from the always-unpleasant David Horowitz:

There is absolutely nothing in Howard Zinn’s intellectual output that is worthy of any kind of respect. Zinn represents a fringe mentality which has, unfortunately, seduced millions of people at this point in time. So, he did certainly alter the consciousness of millions of younger people for the worse.

And that drew brickbats from ATC listeners on the show’s website.

Listeners were “appalled,” “dismayed” and “shocked” over our inclusion of critical comments from conservative pundit David Horowitz’s [sic] in our obituary of Howard Zinn. Zinn, a professor, author and political activist, was unapologetically liberal and gained national renown with his book A People’s History of the United States.

One commenter at Campaign Outsider wasn’t any happier:

I heard the NPR piece before I had the opportunity to read any other obituaries. I was shocked and offended that they chose to wrap up with Horowitz’s comment.

I can appreciate [Campaign Outsider's] desire for a balanced obituary. Yet I can’t help but think of the old adage “Don’t speak ill of the dead.” Surely in the months and years to come, Zinn’s contributions and controversies will continue to be examined by both fans and foes. For now, let his family, friends and admirers mourn him in peace.

Just to make the hardworking staff’s position perfectly clear:

Howard Zinn, R.I.P.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , ,

Reviews From the Bridge

January 30, 2010 · Leave a Comment

The New York revival of Arthur Miller’s “A View from the Bridge,” which the Missus and I caught in previews, opened this week to rave reviews.

Begin with New York Times theater critic Ben Brantley:

I had wondered if “Bridge” really needed another revival. New York saw a first-rate production only a dozen years ago, directed by Michael Mayer, with Anthony LaPaglia,Allison Janney and the young Brittany Murphy (who died at 32 last year). But this latest incarnation makes the case that certain plays, like certain operas, are rich enough to be revisited as often and as long as there are performers with strong, original voices and fresh insights.

But here’s Brantley on Liev Schreiber, who plays the tragic nothing-like-a-hero Eddie Carbone:

Mr. Schreiber registers changes in emotional temperature with organic physical precision. At one point, maybe 20 minutes into the show, I looked at his face and it had acquired that drawn, stripped look that comes from sleepless nights. There was no doubting that Eddie Carbone was headed for some kind of breakdown, or that Mr. Schreiber had been gently steering you toward this perception since his first appearance.

Mr. Schreiber is such a complete actor that he has often thrown productions into imbalance, highlighting the inadequacy of the performances around him. That is not a problem here. That the excellent stage veteran [Jessica] Hecht holds her own with Mr. Schreiber is no surprise. That [Scarlett] Johansson does — with seeming effortlessness — is.

The surprise, according to Brantley, is this:

In recent years Broadway’s stages have been littered with dim performances from bright screen stars, including Julia Roberts and Katie Holmes. Film actresses as famous as Ms. Johansson tend to create their own discomfort zones onstage, defined by the mixed expectations of fans and skeptics. I was definitely aware of that zone when I saw Keira Knightley in “The Misanthrope” in London recently.

By comparison, Ms. Johansson melts into her character so thoroughly that her nimbus of celebrity disappears. Her Catherine is a girl on the cusp of womanhood, feeling her way down familiar paths that have suddenly been shrouded in unfamiliar shadows.

Wall Street Journal theater critic Terry Teachout agrees:

Of course you’ll be wondering about Ms. Johansson, whose Broadway debut this is, and I can tell you all you need to know in a sentence: She is so completely submerged in her role that you could easily fail to spot her when she makes her first entrance.

About the production overall Teachout says:

It had never occurred to me that you could perform “A View From the Bridge” in a subtle way. Nothing is exaggerated, nothing italicized, nothing blown out of proportion. Instead of being shoved in your face like a pie, the terrible things that happen in the play are simply allowed to happen, the way they do in real life.

Not so, Teachout adds in the same review, with the just-opened “Time Stands Still” (which the Missus and I also caught in previews):

I wish I could say something nice about a play that stars Laura Linney, Alicia Silverstone, Eric Bogosian and Brian d’Arcy James. No can do: Donald Margulies’s “Time Stands Still” is a predictable piece of middle-of-the-road Pulitzer bait that has nothing to recommend it beyond the cast, Daniel Sullivan’s staging and [John Lee] Beatty’s set, all of which are exemplary.

While Teachout thinks “Time Stands Still” is flawed, New York Times emergency-backup theater critic Charles Isherwood thinks it’s “flawless.”

As the Missus says, that’s what makes horse races.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , , , ,

The Weakly Standard

January 29, 2010 · 1 Comment

Leave it to the neocon newsletter to imply that it had eight – count ‘em, eight – writers assigned to the Massachusetts Senator-elect Scott Brown (R-Drop Dead Gorgeous) beat.

In reality, only three pieces (here, here, and here) actually dealt with the Massachusetts Miracleman. The rest addressed the “And the Era of Big Obama Is Over” part of the cover.

Bait and switch? You ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , ,

Boston Is Zinn City

January 29, 2010 · 4 Comments

Thursday’s Boston Globe front-paged its obituary of Boston University historian and political activist Howard Zinn, and it was surprising that for such a controversial figure there was no, well, controversy in the piece.

As the Globe turns, apparently, no one has a bad word to say about Zinn, a legendarily divisive figure.

Call it a glowbituary.

The Boston Herald obit is similarly air-kissy, as is – no surprise – the New York Times sendoff.

But – big surprise – NPR’s All Things Considered actually tried to produce a balanced memorial, albeit with comments from the vile David Horowitz:

There is absolutely nothing in Howard Zinn’s intellectual output that is worthy of any kind of respect. Zinn represents a fringe mentality which has, unfortunately, seduced millions of people at this point in time. So, he did certainly alter the consciousness of millions of younger people for the worse.

Not to mention the Boston Globe, the Boston Herald, and the New York Times.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , ,

Dead Blogging the State of the Union Address

January 28, 2010 · 1 Comment

Listening to the chin-strokerati, anyone would have expected Barack Obama to enter the  House chamber Wednesday night and say:

“The state of our union is . . . cool” (wearing sunglasses)

Or:

“The state of our union is . . . all my fault” (wearing sackcloth and ashes)

He said neither.

Instead Pres. Obama said, in effect, the state of our union is . . . dysfunctional. (Transcript here, via the Chicago Sun-Times.)

First, as always, the optics:

Obama at the podium (nice suit, Mr. President), with Vice President Joe (Bobblehead) Biden and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Sesame Street) behind him.

Pres. Obama started out with a stately and compelling paean to the American people.

They share a stubborn resilience in the face of adversity. After one of the most difficult years in our history, they remain busy building cars and teaching kids, starting businesses and going back to school. They’re coaching Little League and helping their neighbors. One woman wrote to me and said, “We are strained but hopeful, struggling but encouraged.

It’s because of this spirit — this great decency and great strength — that I have never been more hopeful about America’s future than I am tonight. Despite our hardships, our union is strong. We do not give up. We do not quit. We do not allow fear or division to break our spirit. In this new decade, it’s time the American people get a government that matches their decency; that embodies their strength.

Throughout his speech, Obama similarly used the American people and what they deserve as a cudgel to whack Republican lawmakers in Congress.

He also used his predecessor, George W. Bush, to lay America’s problems off on.

Representative samples:

So I supported the last administration’s efforts to create the financial rescue program. And when we took that program over, we made it more transparent and more accountable. And as a result, the markets are now stabilized, and we’ve recovered most of the money we spent on the banks.

At the beginning of the last decade, the year 2000, America had a budget surplus of over $200 billion. By the time I took office, we had a one-year deficit of over $1 trillion and projected deficits of $8 trillion over the next decade. Most of this was the result of not paying for two wars, two tax cuts, and an expensive prescription drug program. On top of that, the effects of the recession put a $3 trillion hole in our budget. All this was before I walked in the door.

From some on the right, I expect we’ll hear a different argument — that if we just make fewer investments in our people, extend tax cuts including those for the wealthier Americans, eliminate more regulations, maintain the status quo on health care, our deficits will go away. The problem is that’s what we did for eight years.

We have gone from a bystander to a leader in the fight against climate change.

My administration has a Civil Rights Division that is once again prosecuting civil rights violations and employment discrimination.

Starting in 2011, we are prepared to freeze government spending for three years. Spending related to our national security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security will not be affected. But all other discretionary government programs will. Like any cash-strapped family, we will work within a budget to invest in what we need and sacrifice what we don’t. And if I have to enforce this discipline by veto, I will.

Over all, Obama was alternately confrontational and collegial, making the assembled lawmakers look like players in a game of Whack-a-Mole: Some of his lines brought Democrats to their feet, others got Republicans standing.

But it’s hard to argue with the conclusion to his speech:

The spirit that has sustained this nation for more than two centuries lives on in you, its people. We have finished a difficult year. We have come through a difficult decade. But a new year has come. A new decade stretches before us.

We don’t quit.

I don’t quit.

Let’s seize this moment — to start anew, to carry the dream forward, and to strengthen our union once more.

We should live so long.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , ,

Super Bowl Adstravaganza

January 27, 2010 · 2 Comments

Let the wild Super Bowl rumpus begin!

Starting from the bottom, compliments of MSNBC:

10 of the worst Super Bowl ads ever created

Viewers found these ads either racist, sexist, boring or just

plain strange

View ‘em and weep.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , ,

On the Marc

January 27, 2010 · Leave a Comment

My great and dear Facebook friend, Massachusetts Sen. Marc Pacheco (D-Social Media), just sent me this message:

Dear friend,

In the coming week I will be taking down this Friend Page and will replace it with a Fan Page. I apologize for the inconvenience but hope you will join my new page. It will have the same title “Marc Pacheco”. As usual I will be available through email Senpacheco@tmlp.com and through my website http://www.facebook.com/l/f3904;www.marcpacheco.org

Thank you,

Marc

Okay, just for the record:

I’m sort of comfortable being friended by Pacheco.

Not so much being fanned.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: ,

From the Mailbag . . .

January 26, 2010 · 1 Comment

No sooner did the hardworking staff at Campaign Outsider read this front-page piece in Monday’s New York Times headlined “Re-energized, G.O.P. Widens Midterm Effort,” than two – count ‘em, two – Republican fundraising letters poured into the Global Worldwide Headquarters.

(BTW, was anyone else disappointed that the Times piece said, “Just since Tuesday, half a dozen Republicans have expressed interest in challenging Democrats in House races in New York, Pennsylvania and potentially Massachusetts, party officials said” – but never specified who the Massachusetts “potentials” might be?)

Anyway . . .

Republican Correspondent #1: Massachusetts gubernatorial hopeful Charlie Baker, whose fundraising package included a nice picture and a letter that opened with, “It is painfully clear that this two-year experiment with one party rule in Massachusetts’ state government is not working.”

Yes, and it’s painfully clear that Baker has found the theme he’ll flog for the next seven months.

Republican Correspondent #2: Texas Sen. John Cornyn, Chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, who sent the hardworking staff a Republican Strategy Survey (online version here) and opened his letter this way:

If you are registered to vote in the 4th district of Massachusetts, and tend to identify yourself as a Republican or Republican-leaning voter, please answer and return this brief Republican Strategy Survey today.

If you are not registered to vote as a Republican in the District indicated, please return your unmarked survey to me immediately. Thank you for your cooperation and prompt response.

Actually, that would be your prompt non-response. Not to get technical about it.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , ,

Big Media Driving Ford

January 25, 2010 · 2 Comments

Former Tennessee congressman and current New York political heartthrob Harold Ford got the Big Interview Chair (and a nice cuddle) at the Wall Street Journal over the weekend, and today Ford gets a byline on the New York Times op-ed page.

In both instances Ford calls for tax cuts for businesses, more focused health reform legislation, and jobs jobs jobs. But in the WSJ he also gets to take a few whacks at interim Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-David Paterson).

Mr. Ford’s main criticism of Ms. Gillibrand—echoed by others—is that she’s little more than an acolyte of Democrat Chuck Schumer.

And so Ford is mulling over a primary challenge to Gillibrand in this fall’s Democratic Senate primary. From the Journal:

Anticipating criticism that a primary would be divisive and cost money better spent on the general election, Mr. Ford argues that it’s more important for voters to have the opportunity to choose the Democratic nominee. “In this race, the reality is that Senator Gillibrand was appointed by a governor who was not elected,” he said, referring to the fact that Mr. Paterson became governor when his predecessor, Eliot Spitzer, resigned in the wake of a prostitution scandal. “She is not the incumbent. New Yorkers have never had a chance to vote for her.”

One question: Will the Times and the Journal give Gillibrand a chance to whack back?

UPDATE: I forgot to mention the puff piece on Ford in the news section of Monday’s Times. It included this:

Mr. Ford has already lashed out at “party bosses” who, he says, are trying to protect Ms. Gillibrand from a challenge, and has latched on to the language [Massachusetts Senator-elect Scott] Brown used to describe a post in the Senate as “the people’s seat.”

What the Times big wet kiss did not include was this: Any response from those party bosses or Sen. Gillibrand or anyone.

It’s clear the Times wants Ford to launch a primary challenge to Gillibrand. But really, fellas, you’re gonna tear a ligament at this pace.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , ,